Exodus 21:4

אִם־אֲדֹנָיו יִתֶּן־לוֹ אִשָּׁה וְיָלְדָה־לוֹ בָנִים אוֹ בָנוֹת הָאִשָּׁה וִילָדֶיהָ תִּהְיֶה לַֽאדֹנֶיהָ וְהוּא יֵצֵא בְגַפּֽוֹ׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

אִם־אֲדֹנָיו֙ יִתֶּן־ל֣וֹ אִשָּׁ֔ה וְיָלְדָה־ל֥וֹ בָנִ֖ים א֣וֹ בָנ֑וֹת הָאִשָּׁ֣ה וִילָדֶ֗יהָ תִּהְיֶה֙ לַֽאדֹנֶ֔יהָ וְה֖וּא יֵצֵ֥א בְגַפּֽוֹ׃

Greek (Septuagint)

ἐὰν δὲ ὁ κύριος δῷ αὐτῷ γυναῖκα, καὶ τέκη αὐτῷ υἱοὺς ἢ θυγατέρας, ἡ γυνὴ καὶ τὰ παιδία ἔσται τῷ κυρίῳ αὐτοῦ, αὐτὸς δὲ μόνος ἐξελεύσεται.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Sin autem dominus dederit illi uxorem, et pepererit filios et filias: mulier et liberi ejus erunt domini sui, ipse vero exibit cum vestitu suo.

Spanish

Si su amo le da una esposa y ella le da hijos o hijas, la esposa y los niños serán de su amo, y el esclavo se irá solo.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Si su amo le hubiere dado mujer, y ella le hubiere parido hijos ó hijas, la mujer y sus hijos serán de su amo, y él saldrá solo.

English

If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the woman and her children shall belong to her master, and only the man shall go free.

What the text says

Summary

This verse addresses the case of a male servant whose master gave him a wife during his service. If that wife bore him sons or daughters, the woman and her children remain the property of the master, while the man himself goes free alone at the end of his term.

Key words

  • 'adonav ("his masters", H0113) — masculine plural noun in construct with a pronominal suffix; despite the plural form, it functions as a singular "master" (a common Hebrew plural of respect/intensity), referring to the servant's owner.
  • yitten ("he will give", H5414O) — qal imperfect, marking a future/conditional action within the "if" clause set up by 'im ("if", H0518A).
  • yaledah ("she will bear", H3205) — qal sequential perfect (vav + perfect), continuing the temporal chain begun by the imperfect yitten; this verb form links consequence to the preceding condition.
  • tihyeh ("she will belong", H1961) — qal imperfect of the verb "to be," here indicating future state/ownership; grammatically the subject is ha'ishah ("the woman", H0802H) together with yeladeiha ("her children", H3206).
  • begappo ("with his body", H1610) — construct noun with pronominal suffix, literally "in/with his body," describing the manner of the man's departure.

What the text says

The verse is built as a conditional sentence: the protasis ('im + yitten, "if his master(s) gives") sets up a scenario, followed by a sequential perfect (yaledah, "and she bears") that narrates the resulting event as part of the same temporal chain. This grammatical pairing — imperfect followed by vav + perfect — is typical of Biblical Hebrew casuistic (case) law, where a hypothetical situation unfolds in sequence.

The apodosis states the legal outcome using tihyeh ("she will belong", H1961), a form of the verb "to be" that here expresses future disposition or legal status rather than mere existence. The subject of this clause is compound: ha'ishah ("the woman") and yeladeiha ("her children", construct form with suffix "her"), both governed by the singular verb tihyeh. The phrase la'adonei-ha ("to her masters", H0113 again in plural-of-respect form with feminine suffix) specifies to whom the woman and children belong.

The final clause contrasts the man's fate: hu yetse begappo ("he will go out with his body/alone"). The noun gap ("body", H1610) in construct with the suffix "his" is an idiom describing the manner of departure — literally "in his own body," meaning without additional possessions gained from the arrangement (i.e., without the wife and children).

Differences between versions

The LXX renders begappo ("with his body", H1610) as μόνος ("alone"), an interpretive translation of the idiom rather than a literal rendering. The Vulgate instead reads cum vestitu suo ("with his own clothing"), a different interpretive choice for the same Hebrew phrase. The Hebrew gap itself does not explicitly mean "alone" or "clothing"; both versions offer distinct readings of this idiomatic expression describing how the man departs.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.