Numbers 16:31
וַיְהִי כְּכַלֹּתוֹ לְדַבֵּר אֵת כָּל־הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה וַתִּבָּקַע הָאֲדָמָה אֲשֶׁר תַּחְתֵּיהֶֽם׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיְהִי֙ כְּכַלֹּת֔וֹ לְדַבֵּ֕ר אֵ֥ת כָּל־הַדְּבָרִ֖ים הָאֵ֑לֶּה וַתִּבָּקַ֥ע הָאֲדָמָ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר תַּחְתֵּיהֶֽם׃
ὡς δὲ ἐπαύσατο λαλῶν πάντας τοὺς λόγους τούτους, ἐρράγη ἡ γῆ ὑποκάτω αὐτῶν,
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Confestim igitur ut cessavit loqui, dirupta est terra sub pedibus eorum:
Apenas terminó de decir estas palabras, el suelo se abrió debajo de ellos.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y aconteció, que en acabando él de hablar todas estas palabras, rompióse la tierra que estaba debajo de ellos:
As soon as Moses had finished saying all this, the ground beneath them split open,
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse marks a narrative turning point: immediately after the speaker (Moses, per context) finishes uttering a specific set of words, the ground beneath the rebels splits open. The Hebrew structure emphasizes both the temporal immediacy and the completeness of the preceding speech.
Key words
- va-y'hi ("and it was", H1961) — narrative vav plus the verb "to be" in the simple (qal) form, marking the classic Hebrew formula for introducing a new narrative event: "and it happened that..."
- ke-khaloto ("when he finished", H3615G) — piel infinitive with the preposition ke ("when") and a pronominal suffix ("his"), giving intensive force to "finish" and expressing exact simultaneity: "in his finishing."
- le-dabber ("to speak", H1696G) — piel infinitive construct, intensive stem of "speak," paired with khaloto to form the idiom "when he finished speaking."
- ha-devarim ha-'elleh ("these words", H1697G + H0428) — plural noun with definite article followed by the demonstrative "these," pointing back to a specific, bounded set of words already spoken.
- tibbaqa' ("it was split open", H1234) — niphal (passive) narrative verb, feminine, agreeing with ha-adamah ("the ground"); the passive form presents the splitting as something that happens to the ground rather than an action the ground performs.
What the text says
The verse opens with the narrative formula va-y'hi ("and it was"), which in Biblical Hebrew signals a shift in the story's action. This is immediately followed by a temporal clause built on two piel infinitives in sequence: ke-khaloto le-dabber — literally "when his-finishing to-speak," meaning "when he finished speaking." Both infinitives (khalot, "to finish," and dabber, "to speak") are in the intensive piel stem, which in these verbs conveys the completed, deliberate act of finishing a speech rather than a casual trailing-off.
The object of the speech is marked by the untranslated direct-object particle 'et (H0853) followed by kol ha-devarim ha-'elleh — "all these words" — a construct phrase specifying that the entire preceding block of speech, no more and no less, is in view. The demonstrative 'elleh ("these") ties the statement to what came immediately before in the narrative.
The second half of the verse begins with another narrative va-, introducing tibbaqa' ("it was split open"), a niphal (passive) verb form. The passive voice places grammatical focus on the ground (ha-adamah, feminine singular) as the entity acted upon, rather than naming an agent. The relative clause asher tachteihem ("which was under them") uses a construct noun form (tachtei, "underneath of") plus a third-person plural suffix to locate the ground precisely beneath the group referenced earlier in the chapter.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the Hebrew double-infinitive construction (khaloto le-dabber, "his finishing to speak") with a participial phrase, ἐπαύσατο λαλῶν ("he ceased speaking"), collapsing the two Hebrew infinitives into one finite verb plus participle. The Vulgate's cessavit loqui ("he ceased to speak") similarly merges the construction but adds confestim ("immediately"), an adverb not present as a separate lexical item in the Hebrew text, though it reflects the temporal immediacy implied by ke- ("when/as"). The Vulgate also specifies sub pedibus eorum ("under their feet"), whereas the Hebrew tachteihem only says "under them," without mentioning feet.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.