Leviticus 6:3
אֽוֹ־מָצָא אֲבֵדָה וְכִחֶשׁ בָּהּ וְנִשְׁבַּע עַל־שָׁקֶר עַל־אַחַת מִכֹּל אֲשֶׁר־יַעֲשֶׂה הָאָדָם לַחֲטֹא בָהֵֽנָּה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
אֽוֹ־מָצָ֧א אֲבֵדָ֛ה וְכִ֥חֶשׁ בָּ֖הּ וְנִשְׁבַּ֣ע עַל־שָׁ֑קֶר עַל־אַחַ֗ת מִכֹּ֛ל אֲשֶׁר־יַעֲשֶׂ֥ה הָאָדָ֖ם לַחֲטֹ֥א בָהֵֽנָּה׃
ἢ εὗρεν ἀπωvλίαν καὶ ψεύσηται περὶ αὐτῆς, καὶ ὀμόσῃ ἀδίκως περὶ ἑνὸς ἀπὸ πάντων ὧν ἐὰν ποιήσῃ ὁ ἄνθρωπος ὥστε ἁμαρτεῖν ἐν τούτοις,
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
sive rem perditam invenerit, et inficians insuper pejeraverit, et quodlibet aliud ex pluribus fecerit, in quibus solent peccare homines,
o si encuentra algo perdido y miente al respecto, y jura en falso por cualquiera de estas cosas en las que suele pecar el ser humano,
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
O sea que hallando lo perdido, después lo negare, y jurare en falso, en alguna de todas aquellas cosas en que suele pecar el hombre:
or finds lost property and lies about it and swears falsely, or if he commits any such sin that a man might commit —
✦ What the text says
Summary
This verse continues a legal enumeration of wrongful acts: a person who finds lost property ('avedah, H0009), denies having it, and swears falsely about the matter. It closes the list of offenses that fall under the category of "sinning in one of all these things that a person may do."
Key words
- matsa ("he has found", H4672) — qal perfect, marking a completed act: the finding of the lost item as the starting condition.
- kichesh ("he will deny", H3584) — piel sequential perfect; the piel stem intensifies the verb, indicating an active, deliberate denial rather than a simple negation.
- nishba' ("he will swear an oath", H7650) — niphal sequential perfect; the niphal here functions in a reflexive/middle sense typical of oath-taking verbs in Hebrew, "he swears (himself)."
- sheqer ("falsehood", H8267) — masculine singular noun governed by the preposition 'al ("on/concerning", H5921A), specifying the content of the oath as false.
- chato' ("sin", H2398) — qal infinitive, expressing purpose or result ("so as to sin," or "in sinning"), tying the whole list of acts to the general category of sin.
What the text says
The verse is built as a chain of sequential perfect verbs (kichesh, nishba') following an initial qal perfect (matsa'), a common Hebrew narrative-legal structure where one completed action leads naturally into the next: finding leads to denial, denial leads to a false oath. The piel form of kachash signals more than passive non-disclosure — it denotes an intensified, willful act of deceit "in it" (bah, referring back to the feminine noun 'avedah, "lost thing"). The niphal form of shava' for swearing is grammatically fixed for oath contexts in Hebrew and does not carry a distinct passive meaning here beyond the idiomatic sense of "taking an oath."
The final clause, 'achat mikol 'asher ya'aseh ha'adam lachato' vahennah ("one of all that a person may do, sinning by them"), uses the feminine plural pronoun hennah ("them", H9039) to refer back to the list of feminine-gendered matters catalogued earlier in the legal unit (deposits, lost items, and similar cases). The qal imperfect ya'aseh ("he will do", H6213A) indicates a general, potential action rather than one already completed, framing this clause as a summary category covering any of the preceding offenses.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders sheqer ("falsehood") with the adverb ἀδίκως ("unjustly"), shifting the noun into a manner-adverb modifying the swearing itself, whereas the Hebrew treats sheqer as the object of the oath ("swears concerning falsehood"). The Vulgate compresses the final relative clause ('achat mikol 'asher ya'aseh ha'adam lachato' vahennah) into a general statement, "quodlibet aliud ex pluribus fecerit, in quibus solent peccare homines" ("or has done anything else, among the many things in which people usually sin"), losing the specific feminine-plural back-reference (hennah) that ties the clause to the preceding list of items in the Hebrew text.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.