Leviticus 14:19

וְעָשָׂה הַכֹּהֵן אֶת־הַחַטָּאת וְכִפֶּר עַל־הַמִּטַּהֵר מִטֻּמְאָתוֹ וְאַחַר יִשְׁחַט אֶת־הָעֹלָֽה׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְעָשָׂ֤ה הַכֹּהֵן֙ אֶת־הַ֣חַטָּ֔את וְכִפֶּ֕ר עַל־הַמִּטַּהֵ֖ר מִטֻּמְאָת֑וֹ וְאַחַ֖ר יִשְׁחַ֥ט אֶת־הָעֹלָֽה׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ποήσει ὁ ἱερεὺς τὸ περὶ τῆς ἁμαρτίας, καὶ ἐξιλάσεται περὶ αὐτοῦ ὁ ἱερεὺς τοῦ ἀκαθάρτου τοῦ καθαριζομένου ἀπὸ τῆς ἁμαρτίας αὐτοῦ· καὶ μετὰ τοῦτο σφάξει ὁ ἱερεὺς τὸ ὁλοκαύτωμα.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Rogabitque pro eo coram Domino, et faciet sacrificium pro peccato: tunc immolabit holocaustum,

Spanish

“Después el sacerdote presentará la ofrenda por el pecado para hacer expiación por la persona que se está purificando. Luego degollará el animal para el holocausto,

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Ofrecerá luego el sacerdote el sacrificio por el pecado, y hará expiación por el que se ha de purificar de su inmundicia, y después degollará el holocausto:

English

Then the priest is to sacrifice the sin offering and make atonement for the one to be cleansed from his uncleanness. After that, the priest shall slaughter the burnt offering

What the text says

Summary

The verse describes the priest performing two ritual actions in sequence: first offering the chattat ("sin offering", H2403H) and making atonement for the person undergoing purification, then afterward slaughtering the olah ("burnt offering", H5930A). The Hebrew marks a strict temporal order between these two acts using the sequential verb chain and the adverb "after."

Key words

  • khiPer ("he will make atonement", H3722A) — piel (intensive) stem, sequential perfect form; the piel stem here conveys an intensive/effective action, "to bring about atonement," rather than a simple action.
  • mitaHer ("[one] purifying himself", H2891) — hithpael (reflexive) participle; the reflexive stem indicates the subject undergoes the purification process himself, described as an ongoing state ("the one purifying himself") rather than a completed act.
  • tum'aT ("uncleanness", H2932) — feminine singular noun in construct form, linked to the following pronominal suffix o ("his", H9023), producing "his uncleanness."
  • 'aChar ("after", H0310A) — functions adverbially here to sequence the narrative, explicitly separating the atonement act from the burnt-offering slaughter.
  • yishChat ("he will cut [the] throat of", H7819A) — qal imperfect, denoting the specific action of slaughtering by cutting the throat, applied to the olah.

What the text says

The sentence is built as a chain of sequential perfect verbs connected by the narrative ve ("and", H9001): 'aSah ("he will offer", H6213I) followed by khiPer ("he will make atonement", H3722A). This verb chain construction in Hebrew narrative indicates one action following directly upon another in the storyline, here describing the priest's handling of the chattat. The atonement action is directed "on" ('al, H5921A) the mitaHer, the participial form describing the person as one currently in the process of purifying himself (hithpael, reflexive), "from his uncleanness" (mi-tum'aTo).

The clause then shifts using ve-'aChar ("and after", H0310A) plus the qal imperfect yishChat ("he will cut the throat of", H7819A), marking a distinct temporal break: the burnt offering's slaughter happens only once the sin-offering ritual and atonement are complete. This explicit ordering — sin offering and atonement first, burnt offering second — is grammatically marked by the shift from the sequential perfect chain to the adverb "after" plus imperfect verb, distinguishing it from a simple continuation of the same narrative sequence.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders khiPer ("he will make atonement", H3722A) with ἐξιλάσεται περὶ αὐτοῦ ὁ ἱερεὺς ("the priest will atone for him"), making the priest as subject explicit a second time, where the Hebrew uses only the verb without repeating "the priest." The Vulgate adds "coram Domino" ("before the Lord"), a phrase not present in the Hebrew text provided. The Vulgate also reorders the clauses, placing "Rogabitque pro eo" (praying/atoning for him) before mentioning the sin sacrifice, whereas the Hebrew sequence presents the chattat offering first, then the atonement act.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.