Leviticus 14:18
וְהַנּוֹתָר בַּשֶּׁמֶן אֲשֶׁר עַל־כַּף הַכֹּהֵן יִתֵּן עַל־רֹאשׁ הַמִּטַּהֵר וְכִפֶּר עָלָיו הַכֹּהֵן לִפְנֵי יְהוָֽה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְהַנּוֹתָ֗ר בַּשֶּׁ֙מֶן֙ אֲשֶׁר֙ עַל־כַּ֣ף הַכֹּהֵ֔ן יִתֵּ֖ן עַל־רֹ֣אשׁ הַמִּטַּהֵ֑ר וְכִפֶּ֥ר עָלָ֛יו הַכֹּהֵ֖ן לִפְנֵ֥י יְהוָֽה׃
τὸ δὲ καταλειφθὲν ἔλαιον τὸ ἐπὶ τῆς χειρὸς ἱερέως ἐπιθήσει ὁ ἱερεὺς ἐπὶ τὴν κεφαλὴν τοῦ καθαρισθέντος, ἐξιλάσεται περὶ αὐτοῦ ὁ ἱερεὺς ἔναντι κυρίου.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
et super caput ejus.
Y el resto del aceite que le quede en la mano se lo untará a la persona en la cabeza. Así el sacerdote hará expiación por esa persona delante de Yehová.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y lo que quedare del aceite que tiene en su mano, pondrá sobre la cabeza del que se purifica: y hará el sacerdote expiación por él delante de Jehová.
The rest of the oil in his palm, the priest is to put on the head of the one to be cleansed, to make atonement for him before the LORD.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse describes the disposal of the oil remaining in the priest's palm after the preceding application rites: this leftover oil is placed on the head of the person undergoing purification, and the priest performs an atonement rite for that person before Yehovah.
Key words
- noTar ("remainder", H3498) — niphal participle, masculine singular; describes the oil not as an object simply "left over" but as that which "remains" through a passive process, functioning here as a substantive ("the remaining [oil]").
- mitaher ("one purifying himself", H2891) — hithpael participle, masculine singular; the reflexive/reciprocal stem marks the subject as the one undergoing the purification process himself, not merely a passive recipient.
- kaf ("palm of", H3709) — feminine singular construct, linking to ha-kohen ("the priest") to specify the exact location of the oil before its transfer.
- khiPer ("he will make atonement", H3722) — piel stem, sequential perfect (vav-consecutive) after the preceding imperfect yiTen; the piel intensive stem denotes the priest's performative action of atonement.
- lifnei Yehovah ("before Yehovah", H6440 + H3068) — construct noun fenei ("face of") plus divine name, marking the location/orientation of the ritual act as performed in Yehovah's presence.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence is built on two main verbs in sequence: yiTen ("he will put/give", imperfect) and khiPer ("he will atone", vav-consecutive perfect), which together narrate two successive priestly actions — first the physical placement of oil, then the ritual act of atonement. The subject of both verbs is ha-kohen ("the priest"), though it is stated explicitly only with the second verb, after the object clause describing the oil.
The oil itself is described through a chain of construct and relative constructions: ha-noTar ba-shemen ("the remainder in the oil") asher al-kaf ha-kohen ("which is on the palm of the priest"). The niphal participle noTar frames the oil as "what remains" from a prior action (not narrated in this verse but implied from context), rather than as newly introduced material.
The recipient of the oil, ha-mitaher, is marked with the hithpael participle, a form that in Hebrew often indicates a person in the state or process of undergoing an action affecting himself — here, undergoing purification. The verse closes with lifnei Yehovah, situating the atonement act spatially/relationally "before Yehovah."
Differences between versions
The Vulgate text supplied here (et super caput ejus, "and upon his head") is only a fragment corresponding to part of the clause about placing oil "on the head," not a full rendering of the verse, so no complete comparison with the Hebrew is possible from this data. The Septuagint (LXX) renders ha-mitaher ("the one purifying himself", hithpael) with the participle τοῦ καθαρισθέντος ("the one having been cleansed"), a passive form, where the Hebrew uses a reflexive/reciprocal stem — a difference in how the person's role in the purification is grammatically framed.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.