Leviticus 13:58
וְהַבֶּגֶד אֽוֹ־הַשְּׁתִי אוֹ־הָעֵרֶב אֽוֹ־כָל־כְּלִי הָעוֹר אֲשֶׁר תְּכַבֵּס וְסָר מֵהֶם הַנָּגַע וְכֻבַּס שֵׁנִית וְטָהֵֽר׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְהַבֶּ֡גֶד אֽוֹ־הַשְּׁתִ֨י אוֹ־הָעֵ֜רֶב אֽוֹ־כָל־כְּלִ֤י הָעוֹר֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר תְּכַבֵּ֔ס וְסָ֥ר מֵהֶ֖ם הַנָּ֑גַע וְכֻבַּ֥ס שֵׁנִ֖ית וְטָהֵֽר׃
καὶ τὸ ἱμάτιον ἢ ὁ στήμων ἢ ἡ κρόκη ἢ πᾶν σκεῦος δερμάτινον ὃ πλυθήσεται καὶ ἀποστήσεται ἀπ’ αὐτοῦ ἡ ἁφή, καὶ πλυθήσεται τὸ δεύτερον· καθαρὸν ἔσται.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Si cessaverit, lavabit aqua ea, quæ pura sunt, secundo, et munda erunt.
En cambio, si al lavar la prenda, el tejido, el hilado o el artículo de cuero, la mancha desaparece, se lavará por segunda vez y el artículo quedará puro”.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Empero el vestido, ó estambre, ó trama, ó cualquiera cosa de piel que lavares, y que se le quitare la plaga, lavarse ha segunda vez, y entonces será limpia.
If the mildew disappears from the fabric, weave, or knit, or any leather article after washing, then it is to be washed again, and it will be clean.
✦ What the text says
Summary
This verse describes the outcome when a garment, warp, woof, or leather article that had been affected by a plague (mold/mildew) is washed and the affected mark departs. The text specifies that the item must then be washed a second time, after which it is declared pure.
Key words
- Beged ("garment", H899B) — masculine singular noun naming the first category of item that may bear the affliction.
- Sar ("it will depart", H5493H) — qal sequential perfect, third person masculine; expresses the pivotal condition that the nega ("plague", H5061) departs from the items, triggering the subsequent process.
- Kubbas ("it will be washed", H3526H) — pual (passive intensive) sequential perfect; the same verbal root as tekhabbes ("you will wash") in position 16, but here passive, marking the second washing as something done to the item rather than an action performed by a person.
- Shenit ("a second [time]", H8145) — ordinal number, feminine singular, quantifying how many times the washing occurs after the mark departs.
- Taher ("it will be pure", H2891) — qal sequential perfect; the final verb in the chain, stating the resulting state of the item.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence is built as a chain of four coordinated nouns — beged ("garment", H899B), sheti ("warp", H8359), 'erev ("woof", H6154B), and kol-keli ha'or ("every article of hide", H3627/H5785) — joined by the disjunctive 'ov ("or", H176A), all functioning as the subject of a relative clause introduced by 'asher ("which", H834A). This clause states that "you will wash" (tekhabbes, H3526H, piel imperfect, second person masculine) these items. The main narrative then proceeds through three sequential perfect verbs joined by the narrative vav (H9001): sar ("it will depart", H5493H), kubbas ("it will be washed", H3526H, pual), and taher ("it will be pure", H2891). This verb chain presents a sequence of events rather than isolated statements: first the mark departs from the items (mehem, "from them", H9038, referring back to the plural set of named items), then a second washing occurs, then purity results.
The switch from the active piel tekhabbes (second person, "you wash") to the passive pual kubbas ("it will be washed") shifts the grammatical focus from the person performing the action to the item undergoing it, without a stated agent for the second washing. The ordinal shenit ("a second [time]", H8145) explicitly marks this washing as numerically distinct from the initial one referenced in the relative clause.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders shenit ("a second [time]", H8145) with τὸ δεύτερον, matching the ordinal sense. The Vulgate (VULCLEM) phrases the passage differently, beginning with "Si cessaverit" ("if it has ceased") and referring to washing "ea, quae pura sunt" ("those things which are pure") "secundo" ("a second time"), which frames the condition and washing in a somewhat distinct syntactic order compared to the Hebrew's sequential perfect chain of sar–kubbas–taher.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.