Leviticus 13:57
וְאִם־תֵּרָאֶה עוֹד בַּבֶּגֶד אֽוֹ־בַשְּׁתִי אֽוֹ־בָעֵרֶב אוֹ בְכָל־כְּלִי־עוֹר פֹּרַחַת הִוא בָּאֵשׁ תִּשְׂרְפֶנּוּ אֵת אֲשֶׁר־בּוֹ הַנָּֽגַע׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְאִם־תֵּרָאֶ֨ה ע֜וֹד בַּ֠בֶּגֶד אֽוֹ־בַשְּׁתִ֤י אֽוֹ־בָעֵ֙רֶב֙ א֣וֹ בְכָל־כְּלִי־ע֔וֹר פֹּרַ֖חַת הִ֑וא בָּאֵ֣שׁ תִּשְׂרְפֶ֔נּוּ אֵ֥ת אֲשֶׁר־בּ֖וֹ הַנָּֽגַע׃
ἐὰν δὲ ὀφθῇ ἔτι ἐν τῷ ἱματίῳ ἢ ἐν τῷ στήμονι ἢ ἐν τῆ κρόκῃ ἢ ἐν παντὶ σκεύει δερματίνῳ, λέπρα ἐξανθοῦσά ἐστιν· ἐν πυρὶ κατακαυθήσεται ἐν ᾧ ἐστὶν ἡ ἁφή.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Quod si ultra apparuerit in his locis, quæ prius immaculata erant, lepra volatilis et vaga, debet igne comburi.
Pero si la mancha vuelve a aparecer, significa que la plaga se está extendiendo. Deberás quemar el artículo que tenga la plaga.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y si apareciere más en el vestido, ó estambre, ó trama, ó en cualquiera cosa de pieles, reverdeciendo en ella, quemarás al fuego aquello donde estuviere la plaga.
But if it reappears in the fabric, weave, or knit, or on any leather article, it is spreading. You must burn the contaminated article.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse gives the concluding case in a legal sequence about garments or leather objects affected by a mold/mildew-like plague: if the affection appears again (od, H5750) in the garment, warp, woof, or any leather article, it is classified as "breaking out" (porachat, H6524A), and the affected item must be burned.
Key words
- tera'eh ("it will appear", H7200G) — niphal imperfect, passive/reflexive form of the root "to see": the plague itself is the grammatical subject that "shows itself," not something a person actively observes.
- od ("again", H5750) — marks recurrence; the condition applies specifically to a second appearance after a prior situation (implied by the wider context of Leviticus 13).
- porachat ("breaking out", H6524A) — qal participle, feminine singular, agreeing with hi' ("it", H1931). The participle form frames the plague as an ongoing, active process rather than a completed state.
- tisrefenu ("you will burn it", H8313) — qal imperfect, second person masculine, with the pronominal suffix -nu ("it/him", H9033) attached, combining subject and object in a single verbal form.
- khol-keli-'or ("every article of hide", H3605 + H3627 + H5785) — a construct chain ("every article of... hide"), stacking three nouns in construct relationship to specify the category of leather objects included under the law.
What the text says
The verse opens with the conditional particles ve-'im ("and if", H9002/H0518A) followed by the niphal verb tera'eh, establishing a conditional clause where the plague is the one "appearing" — the niphal stem places the mold in the grammatical role of subject undergoing perception, rather than a person perceiving it. This is reinforced by od ("again"), signaling that the clause addresses a recurrence after some prior state (not detailed within this single verse but implied by the sequence of cases in the chapter).
The list of possible locations — beged ("garment", H0899B), sheti ("warp", H8359), 'erev ("woof", H6154B), and kol-keli-'or ("every article of hide", H3605+H3627+H5785) — is joined by four instances of 'o ("or", H0176A), enumerating distinct categories of textile and leather objects rather than describing a single item. The predicate porachat hi' ("it is breaking out", H6524A + H1931) uses a participle rather than a finite verb, which grammatically presents the spreading as a characteristic or ongoing condition of the plague at the moment of the second appearance.
The final clause switches to direct address: tisrefenu ("you will burn it") is a second-person imperfect verb with an attached object suffix, followed by an explicit resumption using 'et 'asher bo hanaga' ("that which the plague is in it", H0853+H0834A+H9033+H9009+H5061). This resumptive phrase re-identifies the object to be burned, ensuring the referent (the specific garment or leather article carrying the plague) is unambiguous despite the syntactic distance from the initial list.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders hanaga' ("the plague", H5061) with λέπρα ("leprosy"), a technical term more specific than the Hebrew's general naga' ("plague/mark"). The Vulgate describes the condition as "lepra volatilis et vaga" ("flying and wandering leprosy"), adding descriptive qualifiers ("volatilis et vaga") not present in the Hebrew text, which uses only the participle porachat ("breaking out").
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.