Leviticus 13:28
וְאִם־תַּחְתֶּיהָ תַעֲמֹד הַבַּהֶרֶת לֹא־פָשְׂתָה בָעוֹר וְהִוא כֵהָה שְׂאֵת הַמִּכְוָה הִוא וְטִֽהֲרוֹ הַכֹּהֵן כִּֽי־צָרֶבֶת הַמִּכְוָה הִֽוא׃ פ
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְאִם־תַּחְתֶּיהָ֩ תַעֲמֹ֨ד הַבַּהֶ֜רֶת לֹא־פָשְׂתָ֤ה בָעוֹר֙ וְהִ֣וא כֵהָ֔ה שְׂאֵ֥ת הַמִּכְוָ֖ה הִ֑וא וְטִֽהֲרוֹ֙ הַכֹּהֵ֔ן כִּֽי־צָרֶ֥בֶת הַמִּכְוָ֖ה הִֽוא׃ פ
ἐὰν δὲ κατὰ χώραν μείνῃ τὸ αὐγάζον καὶ μὴ διαχυθῇ ἐν τῷ δέρματι, αὐτὴ δὲ ᾖ ἀμαυρά, ἡ οὐλὴ τοῦ κατακαύματός ἐστιν, καὶ καθαριεῖ αὐτὸν ὁ ἱερεύς· ὁ γὰρ χαρακτὴρ τοῦ κατακαύματός ἐστιν.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Sin autem in loco suo candor steterit non satis clarus, plaga combustionis est, et idcirco mundabitur, quia cicatrix est combusturæ.
Si la mancha brillante no cambia ni se extiende, sino que ha ido desapareciendo, es solo la hinchazón de la quemadura. El sacerdote declarará pura a la persona, pues es solo la cicatriz de la quemadura.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Empero si la mancha se estuviere en su lugar, y no se hubiere extendido en la piel, sino que está oscura, hinchazón es de la quemadura: darálo el sacerdote por limpio; que señal de la quemadura es.
But if the spot is unchanged and has not spread on the skin but has faded, it is a swelling from the burn, and the priest is to pronounce him clean; for it is only the scar from the burn.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse describes the follow-up diagnostic case for a burn-related skin condition: if the bright spot has stayed in place, has not spread on the skin, and has become dull/faded, it is identified as swelling from the burn scar, and the priest is to declare the person clean.
Key words
- ta'amod ("it will stay", H5975G) — qal imperfect, describing the spot's continuing/future condition of remaining stationary, contrasted with active spreading.
- fasetah ("it has spread", H6581) — qal perfect, a completed-action negation ("has not spread"), marking the diagnostic contrast with the earlier stage of the disease where spreading indicated impurity.
- khehah ("dull", H3544) — feminine singular adjective describing the visual quality of the spot as faded, a key sensory criterion for the priest's judgment.
- tihar ("he will declare pure", H2891) — piel sequential perfect, an intensive verb form indicating the priest's formal declarative act, continuing the narrative sequence of the ongoing case.
- tzarevet ("the scar of", H6867B) — feminine singular construct noun, linking directly to mikhvah ("burn", H4348) to specify the technical designation "scar of the burn" as the final classification.
What the text says
The verse opens with the conditional particle 'im ("if", H0518A) governing a chain of clauses describing the physical state of the baheret ("bright spot", H0934). The verb ta'amod ("it will stay", H5975G) is imperfect, suggesting an ongoing or continuing condition — the spot remaining "in place" (tachtei-, H8478I, construct with pronominal suffix "its"). This is followed by a shift to perfect aspect with fasetah lo' ("it has not spread", H6581 + H3808), marking a completed negative action — the spreading did not happen, as opposed to a hypothetical ongoing process.
The clause vehi' khehah ("and it is dull", H1931 + H3544) uses the independent pronoun hi' ("it/she") twice in the verse (also in v.28c and 28d) to emphatically identify the subject at each diagnostic checkpoint — a stylistic feature of Hebrew legal/diagnostic prose repeating the pronoun to anchor each predicate nominal clause (se'et hamikhvah hi', "it is a swelling of the burn"; tzarevet hamikhvah hi', "it is a scar of the burn").
The narrative vav on vetihar ("and he will declare pure", H2891) marks a sequential perfect, showing this act as the narrative consequence following the diagnostic description — the priest's declaration follows logically from the observed lack of spreading and the dullness of the spot. The construct chains se'et hamikhvah and tzarevet hamikhvah both link a symptom-noun to mikhvah ("burn", H4348), producing the technical phrases "swelling of the burn" and "scar of the burn" as parallel diagnostic classifications.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.