Genesis 50:15
וַיִּרְאוּ אֲחֵֽי־יוֹסֵף כִּי־מֵת אֲבִיהֶם וַיֹּאמְרוּ לוּ יִשְׂטְמֵנוּ יוֹסֵף וְהָשֵׁב יָשִׁיב לָנוּ אֵת כָּל־הָרָעָה אֲשֶׁר גָּמַלְנוּ אֹתֽוֹ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיִּרְא֤וּ אֲחֵֽי־יוֹסֵף֙ כִּי־מֵ֣ת אֲבִיהֶ֔ם וַיֹּ֣אמְר֔וּ ל֥וּ יִשְׂטְמֵ֖נוּ יוֹסֵ֑ף וְהָשֵׁ֤ב יָשִׁיב֙ לָ֔נוּ אֵ֚ת כָּל־הָ֣רָעָ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר גָּמַ֖לְנוּ אֹתֽוֹ׃
ἰδόντες δὲ οἱ ἀδελφοὶ Ἰωσὴφ ὅτι τέθνηκεν ὁ πατὴρ αὐτῶν εἶπαν Μή ποτε μνησικακήσῃ ἡμῖν Ἰωσήφ, καὶ ἀνταπόδομα ἀνταποδῷ ἡμῖν πάντα τὰ κακὰ ἃ ἐνεδειξάμεθα αὐτῷ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Quo mortuo, timentes fratres ejus, et mutuo colloquentes: Ne forte memor sit injuriæ quam passus est, et reddat nobis omne malum quod fecimus,
Al ver los hermanos de José que su padre había muerto, pensaron: “¿Qué tal si José nos guarda rencor y ahora nos hace pagar por todo el mal que le hicimos?”
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y viendo los hermanos de José que su padre era muerto, dijeron: Quizá nos aborrecerá José, y nos dará el pago de todo el mal que le hicimos.
When Joseph ’s brothers saw that their father was dead, they said, “ What if Joseph bears a grudge? Then he will surely repay us for all the evil that we did to him.”
✦ What the text says
Summary
Genesis 50:15 reports that after the death of their father, Joseph's brothers grew apprehensive about Joseph's possible retaliation for wrongs they had done him. The verse presents their internal reasoning as reported speech, expressing both a conditional fear and an anticipated consequence.
Key words
- lu ("if", H3863) — a conditional particle introducing a hypothetical or feared scenario, here framing the brothers' worry as speculative rather than certain.
- yistemenu ("he will bear a grudge", H7852) — qal imperfect, denoting an ongoing or future state of hostility; the imperfect aspect leaves open whether this grudge is already present or anticipated.
- hashev ("certainly [to repay]", H7725K) — hiphil infinitive absolute, paired with the following finite verb to intensify the action it modifies.
- yashiv ("he will repay", H7725K) — hiphil imperfect, causative form of the same root as hashev; together they form an emphatic doubling construction.
- gamalnu ("we dealt out to", H1580) — qal perfect, marking the brothers' past action as completed, contrasted with the feared future actions of Joseph.
What the text says
The verse divides into two reported statements. First, the brothers "saw" (va-yir'u, H7200G) that their father had died — the verb met (H4191) is a qal perfect, marking the death as a completed fact that triggers their reaction. Second, their speech is introduced by va-yomerU (H0559), followed by two clauses expressing their fear.
The first clause uses lu (H3863) with the imperfect yistemenu (H7852) — a conditional structure that in Hebrew frames a hypothetical: "if Joseph bears a grudge against us." The second clause contains the construction hashev yashiv (H7725K), where the infinitive absolute hashev precedes the finite imperfect yashiv from the same root. This doubling is a grammatical feature that intensifies the verb's certainty or force — the repayment, if it occurs, is presented as thorough or certain rather than merely possible.
The object of this feared repayment is kol-ha-ra'ah ("all the harm", H7451I), specified by the relative clause asher gamalnu oto ("which we dealt out to him", H1580) — a qal perfect verb marking the brothers' past deeds as completed and unambiguous.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the conditional lu with μή ποτε ("lest perhaps"), a phrase expressing apprehension or caution, differing from the more open Hebrew conditional. The LXX also renders the Hebrew infinitive-absolute-plus-imperfect construction (hashev yashiv) with a noun-plus-verb doubling (ἀνταπόδομα ἀνταποδῷ, "repayment he might repay"), achieving a similar emphatic effect through different grammatical means. The Vulgate renders yistemenu as "memor sit injuriae" ("he might be mindful of the injury"), which shifts the sense from "bearing a grudge" toward "remembering an offense," and explicitly adds "timentes" ("fearing"), a word not present as a discrete lexical item in the Hebrew text.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.