Genesis 47:20
וַיִּקֶן יוֹסֵף אֶת־כָּל־אַדְמַת מִצְרַיִם לְפַרְעֹה כִּֽי־מָכְרוּ מִצְרַיִם אִישׁ שָׂדֵהוּ כִּֽי־חָזַק עֲלֵהֶם הָרָעָב וַתְּהִי הָאָרֶץ לְפַרְעֹֽה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיִּ֨קֶן יוֹסֵ֜ף אֶת־כָּל־אַדְמַ֤ת מִצְרַ֙יִם֙ לְפַרְעֹ֔ה כִּֽי־מָכְר֤וּ מִצְרַ֙יִם֙ אִ֣ישׁ שָׂדֵ֔הוּ כִּֽי־חָזַ֥ק עֲלֵהֶ֖ם הָרָעָ֑ב וַתְּהִ֥י הָאָ֖רֶץ לְפַרְעֹֽה׃
καὶ ἐκτήσατο Ἰωσὴφ πᾶσαν τὴν γῆν τῶν Αἰγυπτίων τῷ Φαραώ· ἀπέδοντο γὰρ οἱ Αἰγύπτιοι τὴν γῆν αὐτῶν τῷ Φαραώ, ἐπεκράτησεν γὰρ αὐτῶν ὁ λιμός, καὶ ἐγένετο ἡ γῆ Φαραώ·
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Emit igitur Joseph omnem terram Ægypti, vendentibus singulis possessiones suas præ magnitudine famis. Subjecitque eam Pharaoni,
Fue así como José compró toda la tierra de Egipto para el faraón. Todos los egipcios se vieron obligados a vender sus campos, porque el hambre se hizo insoportable. De este modo, la tierra pasó a ser propiedad del faraón.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Entonces compró José toda la tierra de Egipto para Faraón; pues los Egipcios vendieron cada uno sus tierras, porque se agravó el hambre sobre ellos: y la tierra vino á ser de Faraón.
So Joseph acquired for Pharaoh all the land in Egypt; the Egyptians, one and all, sold their fields because the famine was so severe upon them. The land became Pharaoh ’s,
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse narrates that Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh, explaining that the Egyptians sold their fields because the famine had become severe, with the result that the land belonged to Pharaoh.
Key words
- va.yi.ken ("he bought", H7069) — qal narrative form, continuing the story line established with the vav-narrative prefix; marks a completed, sequential action by Joseph.
- kol- 'ad.mat mitz.ra.yim ("all [the] land of Egypt") — a construct chain: kol ("all", H3605) governs 'admat ("land of", H0127G), which is itself in construct with mitzrayim ("Egypt", H4714G), producing "all the land of Egypt" as a single grammatical unit.
- ki ("for/that", H3588A) — appears twice (lines 10 and 16), each time introducing a subordinate clause that gives the reason for the main action (Joseph's purchase, and then the severity of the famine).
- ma.khe.ru ("they sold", H4376) — qal perfect, third person plural, denoting a completed action by the Egyptians prior to or explaining the main narrative event.
- cha.zak ("it was severe", H2388G) — qal perfect, third person masculine singular, describing the famine's condition as the cause ('al + suffix "on them") of the selling.
What the text says
The verse is built as a main clause followed by two subordinate clauses introduced by ki ("for/that", H3588A), each explaining an aspect of the situation. The main clause states that Yosef ("Joseph", H3130G) va.yi.ken ("bought", H7069) kol 'admat mitzrayim ("all the land of Egypt") le-far'oh ("for Pharaoh", H6547H/H9005). The first ki-clause explains why: mitzrayim ("Egypt", H4713, referring to the people) ma.khe.ru ("sold", H4376) — each 'ish ("man/everyone", H0376I) his sadehu ("field", H7704G + H9023, "his field"). The second ki-clause gives the underlying cause: cha.zak ("it was severe/strong", H2388G) 'alehem ha-ra'av ("upon them the famine", H5921A + H9038 + H7458).
The final clause, joined again by the narrative vav, states the result: va.tehi ha-'aretz le-far'oh ("and the land became/belonged to Pharaoh", H1961), using the same preposition le- ("to/for") that appeared with Joseph's initial purchase, framing the outcome as ownership transferred to Pharaoh. The repetition of le-far'oh at both the start and the end of the verse frames the entire transaction as beginning and ending with Pharaoh's acquisition.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders mitzrayim (line 12, referring to the Egyptian people who sold) as οἱ Αἰγύπτιοι ("the Egyptians"), making explicit what the Hebrew leaves as the place-name doing double duty for the people. The Vulgate similarly shifts to a participial construction ("vendentibus singulis"), which does not preserve the two separate ki-clauses of the Hebrew but merges the selling and the famine into one causal phrase ("præ magnitudine famis").
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.