Genesis 36:40

וְאֵלֶּה שְׁמוֹת אַלּוּפֵי עֵשָׂו לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לִמְקֹמֹתָם בִּשְׁמֹתָם אַלּוּף תִּמְנָע אַלּוּף עַֽלְוָה אַלּוּף יְתֵֽת׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְ֠אֵלֶּה שְׁמ֞וֹת אַלּוּפֵ֤י עֵשָׂו֙ לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָ֔ם לִמְקֹמֹתָ֖ם בִּשְׁמֹתָ֑ם אַלּ֥וּף תִּמְנָ֛ע אַלּ֥וּף עַֽלְוָ֖ה אַלּ֥וּף יְתֵֽת׃

Greek (Septuagint)

ταῦτα τἀ ὀνόματα τῶν ἡγεμόνων Ἠσαὺ ἐν ταῖς φυλαῖς αὐτῶν κατὰ τόπον αὐτῶν, ἐν ταῖς χώραις αὐτῶν καὶ ἐν τοῖς ἔθνεσιν αὐτῶν· ἡγεμὼν Θαμνᾶ, ἠμεμὼν Γωλά, ἡγεμὼν Ἰεβέρ,

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Hæc ergo nomina ducum Esau in cognationibus, et locis, et vocabulis suis: dux Thamna, dux Alva, dux Jetheth,

Spanish

Éstos son los nombres de los jefes que descienden de Esaú, según sus familias, lugares y nombres: los jefes Timna, Alva, Jetet,

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Estos, pues, son los nombres de los duques de Esaú por sus linajes, por sus lugares, y sus nombres: el duque Timna, el duque Alva, el duque Jetheth,

English

These are the names of Esau ’s chiefs, according to their families and regions, by their names: Chiefs Timna, Alvah, Jetheth,

What the text says

Summary

Genesis 36:40 introduces a list of Esau's chiefs ('allufim), specifying that their names are given according to three categories: their clans, their places, and their (personal) names. The verse then begins the list with the first three chiefs: Timna, Alvah, and Jetheth.

Key words

  • 'e.leh ("these", H0428) — demonstrative particle opening the verse, pointing forward to the list that follows.
  • 'a.lu.Fei ("chiefs of", H0441B) — construct plural, linking "chiefs" to "Esau" ('e.Sav, H6215H) as the group to which these leaders belong.
  • mish.pe.cho.Ta[m] ("clans of...their", H4940 + H9028) — feminine plural construct with pronominal suffix, marking the first of three classificatory categories.
  • m.ko.mo.Ta[m] ("places of...their", H4725 + H9028) — parallel construct+suffix form, the second category, governed by the preposition li ("to", H9005).
  • sh.mo.Ta[m] ("names of...their", H8034 + H9028) — third parallel construct+suffix form, governed by bi ("by", H9003), distinct from the earlier shemot (H8034) used generally for "names" in item 3.

What the text says

The verse opens with ve-'eleh shemot 'allufei 'Esav — "and these [are] the names of the chiefs of Esau" — a standard formulaic introduction to a genealogical list. What follows is a triad of prepositional phrases, each built on a feminine plural construct noun plus a third-person masculine plural suffix ("their"): le-mishpechotam ("according to their clans"), li-meqomotam ("according to their places"), and bi-shmotam ("by their names"). Each phrase uses a different preposition (le, le, be), which in Hebrew grammar signals three separate criteria by which the chiefs are being catalogued — kinship group, territory, and personal name — rather than a single continuous description.

After this triad, the list itself begins not with a construct chain but with repeated absolute uses of 'aluf ("chief", H0441B) followed directly by a personal name: 'aluf Timna, 'aluf 'Alvah, 'aluf Yetet. This repetition of the title before each name, rather than a single plural construct governing all three names at once, gives the list a distributive, one-by-one structure — each individual is separately titled "chief" alongside his name.

Differences between versions

The Hebrew's three-part classification (mishpechotam, meqomotam, shemotam) is rendered by the LXX with four elements: "in their tribes" (φυλαῖς), "according to place" (κατὰ τόπον), "in their regions" (χώραις), and "in their nations" (ἔθνεσιν) — an expansion beyond the three Hebrew terms. The Vulgate's "in cognationibus, et locis, et vocabulis suis" more closely mirrors the Hebrew's three categories. For the names themselves, the LXX gives Θαμνᾶ, Γωλά, and Ἰεβέρ, where the Hebrew has Tim.Na', 'Al.Vah, and Ye.Tet — the second and third names differ notably between the Hebrew and the Greek forms, while the Vulgate's Thamna, Alva, and Jetheth align more closely with the Hebrew.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.