Genesis 36:39
וַיָּמָת בַּעַל חָנָן בֶּן־עַכְבּוֹר וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו הֲדַר וְשֵׁם עִירוֹ פָּעוּ וְשֵׁם אִשְׁתּוֹ מְהֵֽיטַבְאֵל בַּת־מַטְרֵד בַּת מֵי זָהָֽב׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיָּמָת֮ בַּ֣עַל חָנָ֣ן בֶּן־עַכְבּוֹר֒ וַיִּמְלֹ֤ךְ תַּחְתָּיו֙ הֲדַ֔ר וְשֵׁ֥ם עִיר֖וֹ פָּ֑עוּ וְשֵׁ֨ם אִשְׁתּ֤וֹ מְהֵֽיטַבְאֵל֙ בַּת־מַטְרֵ֔ד בַּ֖ת מֵ֥י זָהָֽב׃
ἀπέθανεν δέ Βαλαεννὼν υἱὸς Ἀχοβώρ, καὶ ἐβασίλευσεν ἀντ’ αὐτοῦ Ἁρὰθ υἱὸς Βαράθ. καὶ ὄνομα τῇ πόλει αὐτοῦ Φόγωρ. ὄνομα δὲ τῇ γυναικὶ αὐτοῦ Μετεβεήλ, θυγάτηρ Ματραεὶθ υἱοῦ Μεζοόβ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Isto quoque mortuo regnavit pro eo Adar, nomenque urbis ejus Phau: et appellabatur uxor ejus Meetabel, filia Matred filiæ Mezaab.
Cuando murió Baal Janán, hijo de Acbor, lo sucedió Hadar. Su ciudad se llamaba Pau. Su esposa fue Mehetabel, hija de Matred y nieta de Mezab.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y murió Baalanán, hijo de Achbor, y reinó Adar en lugar suyo: y el nombre de su ciudad fué Pau; y el nombre de su mujer Meetabel, hija de Matred, hija de Mezaab.
When Baal-hanan son of Achbor died, Hadad reigned in his place. His city was named Pau, and his wife’s name was Mehetabel daughter of Matred, the daughter of Me-zahab.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse records the death of Baal-hanan son of Achbor and the accession of Hadar as his successor. It then names Hadar's city (Pau) and his wife (Mehetabel), tracing her lineage through her mother Matred to a figure called Me-zahab.
Key words
- va-yamat ("and he died", H4191) — qal narrative form with vav-consecutive, marking the sequential notice of death typical of the succession lists in this chapter.
- ben ("son of", H1121A) — masculine singular construct, linking Baal-hanan to his father Achbor.
- tachtav ("in his place", H8478H + H9033) — construct noun with pronominal suffix, expressing succession ("in place of him").
- shem ("name of", H8034) — masculine singular construct, used twice to introduce first the city, then the wife, by name.
- bat ("daughter of", H1323G) — feminine singular construct, repeated to build a two-generation female genealogy (Mehetabel, daughter of Matred, daughter of Me-zahab).
What the text says
The verse is built entirely on construct chains, a grammatical feature that lets Hebrew stack relationships without extra connecting words. Ben ("son of", H1121A) attaches Achbor to Baal-hanan, while tachtav ("in his place", H8478H) uses a suffixed noun rather than a preposition-plus-pronoun construction to show that Hadar succeeded him directly. The second half of the verse shifts from succession to identification: shem ("name of", H8034) is used twice, once for the city Pa'u and once for the wife Mehetabel, each introduced by a construct noun rather than a finite verb, giving the text a list-like, archival tone rather than a narrated one.
The double use of bat ("daughter of", H1323G) — "bat Matred, bat Me-zahab" — creates a chain that can be read as Mehetabel, daughter of Matred, who is herself daughter of Me-zahab (a maternal genealogy of three generations), or, depending on how the construct chain is parsed, as Mehetabel being daughter of Matred and separately of Me-zahab as a distinct genealogical note. The Hebrew construct syntax itself does not resolve which reading is intended; it simply juxtaposes the two bat phrases.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders Baal-hanan as a single transliterated name "Βαλαεννών" and gives Hadar's name as "Ἁρὰθ υἱὸς Βαράθ" ("Arath son of Barath"), adding a patronym not present in the Hebrew, which names only Hadar (הֲדַר) without a father. The Vulgate transliterates the same figure as "Adar," dropping the initial he sound found in the Hebrew Hadar. The city name appears as Pa'u (פָּעוּ) in the Hebrew and Vulgate ("Phau"), but as "Φόγωρ" (Phogor) in the LXX. The wife's name, Mehetabel (מְהֵיטַבְאֵל) in Hebrew, appears as "Μετεβεήλ" in the LXX and "Meetabel" in the Vulgate, minor transliteration variants rather than substantive differences.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.