Genesis 29:33
וַתַּהַר עוֹד וַתֵּלֶד בֵּן וַתֹּאמֶר כִּֽי־שָׁמַע יְהוָה כִּֽי־שְׂנוּאָה אָנֹכִי וַיִּתֶּן־לִי גַּם־אֶת־זֶה וַתִּקְרָא שְׁמוֹ שִׁמְעֽוֹן׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַתַּ֣הַר עוֹד֮ וַתֵּ֣לֶד בֵּן֒ וַתֹּ֗אמֶר כִּֽי־שָׁמַ֤ע יְהוָה֙ כִּֽי־שְׂנוּאָ֣ה אָנֹ֔כִי וַיִּתֶּן־לִ֖י גַּם־אֶת־זֶ֑ה וַתִּקְרָ֥א שְׁמ֖וֹ שִׁמְעֽוֹן׃
καὶ συνέλαβεν πάλιν Λεία καὶ ἔτεκεν τῷ Ἰακώβ, καὶ εἶπεν ὅτι Ἤκουσεν κύριος ὅτι μισοῦμαι, καὶ ἐν μοι καὶ τοῦτον· καὶ ἐκάλεσεν τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ Συμεών.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Rursumque concepit et peperit filium, et ait: Quoniam audivit me Dominus haberi contemptui, dedit etiam istum mihi; vocavitque nomen ejus Simeon.
Volvió a quedar embarazada y dio a luz otro hijo, y dijo: “Yehová escuchó que yo no era amada, y por eso me dio también este hijo”. Y lo llamó Simeón.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y concibió otra vez, y parió un hijo, y dijo: Por cuanto oyó Jehová que yo era aborrecida, me ha dado también éste. Y llamó su nombre Simeón.
Again she conceived and gave birth to a son, and she said, “ Because the LORD has heard that I am unloved, He has given me this son as well.” So she named him Simeon.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Leah conceives and bears a second son. She explains the name by stating that Yehovah "heard" that she was unloved and therefore gave her this son also. She names him Simeon, a name built on the same root as "to hear."
Key words
- shama' ("he has heard", H8085G) — qal perfect, 3rd person masculine singular; describes a completed act of hearing attributed to Yehovah, forming the basis of the naming.
- senu'ah ("hated/unloved", H8130) — qal passive participle, feminine singular; describes Leah's state as one who is (or has been) the object of hatred/lack of love, not an action she performs.
- anokhi ("I", H0595) — independent personal pronoun; emphasizes the subject "I" in the clause "that I [am] hated," reinforcing Leah's self-reference.
- va-yiten ("and he has given", H5414G) — qal narrative form, 3rd person masculine singular; continues the narrative chain, attributing the giving of the son to the subject introduced by shama' (Yehovah).
- shem-o ("his name", H8034 + H9023) — construct noun with pronominal suffix; links directly to Shim'on (H8095G), the name given, built on the consonants of shama'.
What the text says
The verse is structured as a chain of four narrative verbs — tahar ("she conceived", H2029), teled ("she bore", H3205), tomer ("she said", H0559), and tiqra ("she called", H7121H) — each introduced by the narrative va (H9001), which sequences the events one after another. Within Leah's speech, two clauses are introduced by ki (H3588A), a particle that here functions as "that," giving the reason for the naming: first, that Yehovah shama' ("has heard", H8085G) — a qal perfect indicating a completed action; second, that she herself is senu'ah ("hated", H8130), expressed as a passive participle describing her ongoing state rather than an action she initiates. The pronoun anokhi ("I", H0595) is added explicitly, even though Hebrew verbs already encode person, giving emphasis to her own situation as the reason cited.
The naming clause tiqra shem-o Shim'on ("she called his name Simeon") uses shem (H8034) in construct form with the suffix -o ("his"), linking the noun "name" directly to the person named. The name Shim'on (H8095G) shares its root letters with shama' ("to hear"), so the text's own reasoning — that Yehovah "heard" — corresponds to the sound of the name given.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders senu'ah ("hated", H8130) with the verb μισοῦμαι ("I am hated"), matching the passive sense of the Hebrew participle. The Vulgate renders the same clause as "haberi contemptui" ("to be held in contempt"), a slightly different phrasing but consistent with the notion of being disliked or scorned. The LXX condenses the phrase gam et-zeh ("also this one", H1571 + H0853 + H2088) into the shorter "καὶ τοῦτον" ("and this one"), omitting a separate rendering for gam ("also").
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.