Exodus 16:20
וְלֹא־שָׁמְעוּ אֶל־מֹשֶׁה וַיּוֹתִרוּ אֲנָשִׁים מִמֶּנּוּ עַד־בֹּקֶר וַיָּרֻם תּוֹלָעִים וַיִּבְאַשׁ וַיִּקְצֹף עֲלֵהֶם מֹשֶֽׁה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְלֹא־שָׁמְע֣וּ אֶל־מֹשֶׁ֗ה וַיּוֹתִ֨רוּ אֲנָשִׁ֤ים מִמֶּ֙נּוּ֙ עַד־בֹּ֔קֶר וַיָּ֥רֻם תּוֹלָעִ֖ים וַיִּבְאַ֑שׁ וַיִּקְצֹ֥ף עֲלֵהֶ֖ם מֹשֶֽׁה׃
καὶ οὐκ εἰσήκουσαν Μωυσῆ, ἀλλὰ κατέλιπόν τινες ἀπ’ αὐτοῦ εἰς τὸ πρωί· καὶ ἐξέζεσεν σκώληκας καὶ ἐπώζεσεν· καὶ ἐπικράνθη ἐπ’ αὐτοῖς Μωυσῆς.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Qui non audierunt eum, sed dimiserunt quidam ex eis usque mane, et scatere cœpit vermibus, atque computruit: et iratus est contra eos Moyses.
Pero algunos no le hicieron caso a Moisés y guardaron un poco para el otro día; pero la comida se llenó de gusanos y empezó a apestar. Moisés se enojó mucho con ellos.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Mas ellos no obedecieron á Moisés, sino que algunos dejaron de ello para otro día, y crió gusanos, y pudrióse; y enojóse contra ellos Moisés.
But they did not listen to Moses; some people left part of it until morning, and it became infested with maggots and began to smell. So Moses was angry with them.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Exodus 16:20 reports that some people ignored Moses's instruction concerning the manna, keeping a portion overnight instead of consuming it all on the same day as told. The leftover manna produced worms and began to smell, and Moses reacted with anger toward those responsible.
Key words
- sha.me.'U ("they listened", H8085G) — qal perfect, third person plural; combined with the negation lo' ("not", H3808), it states a completed failure to obey, not an ongoing refusal.
- yo.Ti.ru ("they left over", H3498) — hiphil (causative) narrative form; the causative stem indicates that the subjects actively caused manna to remain, rather than it remaining by itself.
- Ya.rum ("it became rotten" / "it bred", H7311B) — qal narrative form, third person singular, followed directly by tola'Im ("worms", H8438A) as its object/complement; the verb marks the onset of the infestation process itself.
- yiv.'Ash ("it stank", H0887) — qal narrative, continuing the chain of sequential events after the worm-breeding.
- yik.Tzof ("he was angry", H7107) — qal narrative; paired with the preposition 'a.le.Hem ("toward/against them", H5921A + H9038), forming the standard construction for directed anger.
What the text says
The verse is built as a chain of five narrative (vav-consecutive) verbs — yo.Ti.ru, Ya.rum, yiv.'Ash, and yik.Tzof — each introduced by the narrative vav (H9001), which in Biblical Hebrew links events sequentially: one action follows directly from the previous one. This chain creates a compressed cause-and-effect sequence: leaving manna overside leads to worm-breeding, which leads to stench, which leads to anger. The opening clause, ve-lo' shame'u 'el-Mosheh ("and they did not listen to Moses"), uses a perfect verb rather than a narrative form, setting up the background situation (disobedience) before the narrative chain of consequences begins.
The subject of yo.Ti.ru is 'anashim ("people/men", H0582), left grammatically unspecified as to number or identity beyond "some men" — the text does not name individuals. The phrase mi.Me.nu ("some of it", H4480A + H9033) uses the preposition min with a third-person singular suffix referring back to the manna, indicating a partial quantity, not the whole supply. The final clause places Moses's name at the very end of the sentence, after the verb and prepositional phrase, which is typical Hebrew word order when the subject is deferred for the sake of clause-final emphasis.
Differences between versions
The Hebrew verb Ya.rum (H7311B) is rendered in the LXXSWETE as ἐξέζεσεν ("it boiled/swarmed forth") and in the Vulgate as scatere coepit ("it began to swarm/teem"), both of which frame the appearance of worms as an inceptive, almost visible eruption, whereas the English glosses given for the Hebrew ("it became rotten") emphasize decay rather than the onset of swarming.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.