Numbers 8:4
וְזֶה מַעֲשֵׂה הַמְּנֹרָה מִקְשָׁה זָהָב עַד־יְרֵכָהּ עַד־פִּרְחָהּ מִקְשָׁה הִוא כַּמַּרְאֶה אֲשֶׁר הֶרְאָה יְהוָה אֶת־מֹשֶׁה כֵּן עָשָׂה אֶת־הַמְּנֹרָֽה׃ פ
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְזֶ֨ה מַעֲשֵׂ֤ה הַמְּנֹרָה֙ מִקְשָׁ֣ה זָהָ֔ב עַד־יְרֵכָ֥הּ עַד־פִּרְחָ֖הּ מִקְשָׁ֣ה הִ֑וא כַּמַּרְאֶ֗ה אֲשֶׁ֨ר הֶרְאָ֤ה יְהוָה֙ אֶת־מֹשֶׁ֔ה כֵּ֥ן עָשָׂ֖ה אֶת־הַמְּנֹרָֽה׃ פ
καὶ αὕτη ἡ κατασκευὴ τῆς στερεὰ χρυσῆ, ὁ καυλὸς αὐτῆς καὶ τὰ κρίνα αὐτῆς, στερεὰ ὅλη· κατὰ τὸ εἶδος ὃ ἔδειξεν κύριος τῷ Μωυσῇ, οὕτως ἐποίησεν τὴν λυχνίαν.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Hæc autem erat factura candelabri, ex auro ductili, tam medius stipes, quam cuncta quæ ex utroque calamorum latere nascebantur: juxta exemplum quod ostendit Dominus Moysi, ita operatus est candelabrum.
Esta era la forma en que estaba hecho el candelabro: era obra de oro martillado. Desde su base hasta sus flores, era de oro martillado. Moisés hizo el candelabro exactamente según el modelo que Yehová le había mostrado.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y esta era la hechura del candelero: de oro labrado á martillo; desde su pie hasta sus flores era labrado á martillo: conforme al modelo que Jehová mostró á Moisés, así hizo el candelero.
This is how the lampstand was constructed: it was made of hammered gold from its base to its blossoms, fashioned according to the pattern the LORD had shown Moses. Cleansing the Levites
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse describes the construction of the lampstand (menorah, H4501): it was made of hammered gold from its base to its blossoms, following a pattern that Yehovah had shown Moses. The final clause states that Moses executed the work exactly as instructed.
Key words
- ma.'a.Seh ("work of", H4639G) — masculine singular construct noun, opening the sentence as a predicate nominative bound to "the lampstand"; it frames the whole verse as a description of manufacture rather than mere appearance.
- mik.Shah ("hammered work", H4749) — feminine singular noun appearing twice (once with zahav, "gold," H2091, and again alone before hi'), emphasizing the metalworking technique by repetition.
- ye.re.Kha ("its base", H3409) construct + suffix -h ("her/its", H9024) — marks the lower structural point of the lampstand, paired with pir.Cha ("its blossom", H6525) to form a merism "from base to blossom" covering the entire object.
- her.'Ah ("he had shown", H7200G) — hiphil (causative) perfect verb, indicating that Yehovah caused Moses to see something, i.e., a demonstrative or causative act of showing a model, not simply Moses seeing on his own.
- 'a.Sah ("he made", H6213H) — qal perfect verb, closing the verse; paired with the adverb ken ("so", H3651C), it creates a formula of exact correspondence between the shown pattern and the executed object.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence opens with the demonstrative Zeh ("this", H2088) followed immediately by the construct noun ma.'a.Seh ("work of", H4639G), producing a nominal clause: "this [is] the work of the lampstand." This construction front-loads the topic (the manufacturing process) before any verb appears. The material and technique are specified through two nouns in apposition, mik.Shah ("hammered work", H4749) and za.Hav ("gold", H2091), without a linking verb — a typical feature of Biblical Hebrew nominal clauses.
The phrase 'ad-ye.re.Kha... 'ad-pir.Cha ("to its base... to its blossom") uses the repeated preposition 'ad (H5704) to construct a merism, a rhetorical device naming two extremes (base and blossom) to indicate the totality of the object — the whole lampstand, not just its ends, was hammered work. This is reinforced by the pronoun hi' ("it/she", H1931) after the second mik.Shah, which grammatically restates and closes the description: "hammered work it [was]."
The final two clauses form a paired structure: ka.mar.'Eh 'a.Sher her.'Ah Yehovah ("according to the appearance that Yehovah had shown") and ken 'a.Sah ("so he made"). The hiphil verb her.'Ah (H7200G) indicates a causative act of showing, distinguishing the shown model from a simple visual perception. The adverb ken (H3651C) then creates a direct correspondence between what was shown and what was produced, without naming Moses again as subject of 'a.Sah, though he is understood from the preceding direct object marker construction.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders mar.'Eh ("appearance", H4758) with Greek eidos ("form/shape"), a close semantic match. However, where the Hebrew has pir.Cha ("blossom", H6525), the LXX gives krina ("lilies"), a more specific botanical term not directly present in the Hebrew word itself. The Vulgate's calamorum ("of reeds/branches") for the surrounding structure also introduces a term not explicit in the Hebrew construct chain of base and blossom, describing the branches rather than translating a specific Hebrew word present in this verse.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.