Numbers 5:7
וְהִתְוַדּוּ אֶֽת־חַטָּאתָם אֲשֶׁר עָשׂוּ וְהֵשִׁיב אֶת־אֲשָׁמוֹ בְּרֹאשׁוֹ וַחֲמִישִׁתוֹ יֹסֵף עָלָיו וְנָתַן לַאֲשֶׁר אָשַׁם לֽוֹ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְהִתְוַדּ֗וּ אֶֽת־חַטָּאתָם֮ אֲשֶׁ֣ר עָשׂוּ֒ וְהֵשִׁ֤יב אֶת־אֲשָׁמוֹ֙ בְּרֹאשׁ֔וֹ וַחֲמִישִׁת֖וֹ יֹסֵ֣ף עָלָ֑יו וְנָתַ֕ן לַאֲשֶׁ֖ר אָשַׁ֥ם לֽוֹ׃
ἐξαγορεύσει τὴν ἁμαρτίαν ἢν ἐποίησεν, καὶ ἀποδώσει τὴν πλημμελίαν, τὸ κεφάλαιον, καὶ τὸ ἐπίπεμπτον αὐτοῦ προσθήσει ἐπ’ αὐτό, καὶ ἀποδώσει τίνι ἐπλημμέλησεν αὐτῷ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
confitebuntur peccatum suum, et reddent ipsum caput, quintamque partem desuper, ei in quem peccaverint.
entonces confesará el pecado que ha cometido; y pagará la restitución por su culpa en su totalidad, añadiendo además la quinta parte, y se la dará a la persona contra la cual pecó.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Confesarán su pecado que cometieron, y compensarán su ofensa enteramente, y añadirán su quinto sobre ello, y lo darán á aquel contra quien pecaron.
and must confess the sin he has committed. He must make full restitution, add a fifth to its value, and give all this to the one he has wronged.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Numbers 5:7 describes the required actions after wrongdoing: confession of the offense, full monetary restitution of the wrong plus an additional fifth, and payment of this compensation to the person who was wronged. The verse is built as a chain of sequential verbs describing successive steps in a legal-ritual procedure.
Key words
- hitvaddu ("they will confess", H3034) — hithpael (reflexive/reciprocal) stem, sequential perfect, plural subject; the reflexive form marks confession as an act performed by/for oneself, not a simple declarative statement.
- chatta'tam ("their sin", H2403B) — feminine singular noun in construct state with a plural pronominal suffix, forming "the sin of them."
- heshiv ("he will repay", H7725H) — hiphil (causative) stem, sequential perfect, singular subject; causative form indicates causing something (the debt) to return/be restored.
- rosho ("its sum/head", H7218J) — construct noun with 3ms suffix, idiomatically meaning the principal amount owed.
- yosef ("let him add", H3254H) — hiphil jussive, marking a shift in verbal mood from narrative sequential perfects to a directive form.
What the text says
The verse opens with two verbs joined by narrative vav (H9001) that continue a sequence begun earlier in the passage: hitvaddu ("they will confess") and heshiv ("he will repay"). A notable grammatical feature is the shift in grammatical number: hitvaddu carries a plural subject ("they"), while heshiv, yosef, and natan that follow all carry singular subjects ("he"). The Hebrew text itself moves from a plural verb to singular verbs within the same sequence without explicit subject nouns, relying on suffixes and context to track who acts.
The compensation structure uses a series of construct-state nouns with third-person suffixes — asham-o ("his guilt-offering/compensation"), rosho ("its sum"), chamishito ("its fifth") — stacking possessive relationships tightly without independent possessive pronouns, a compactness Hebrew construct chains allow but which target languages must unpack with prepositions ("of," "its"). The jussive yosef ("let him add") interrupts the perfect-tense sequence, introducing a directive nuance rather than a simple narrative continuation. The final clause, introduced by the relative asher ("which/who", H0834A), identifies the recipient of payment as "the one against whom he was guilty" (asher asham lo), using the same root 'sm ("guilt", H0817/H0816) both for the compensation itself and for the state of being guilty toward someone.
Differences between versions
The Hebrew hitvaddu is plural ("they will confess"), and the Vulgate matches this with confitebuntur (plural) and peccaverint (plural subjunctive). The LXX, however, renders the entire sequence with singular verbs (ἐξαγορεύσει, "he shall confess"; ἀποδώσει, "he shall repay"), aligning with the singular verbs that dominate the rest of the Hebrew sequence rather than preserving the initial plural form found in hitvaddu.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.