Numbers 35:18
אוֹ בִּכְלִי עֵֽץ־יָד אֲשֶׁר־יָמוּת בּוֹ הִכָּהוּ וַיָּמֹת רֹצֵחַֽ הוּא מוֹת יוּמַת הָרֹצֵֽחַ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
א֡וֹ בִּכְלִ֣י עֵֽץ־יָד֩ אֲשֶׁר־יָמ֨וּת בּ֥וֹ הִכָּ֛הוּ וַיָּמֹ֖ת רֹצֵ֣חַֽ ה֑וּא מ֥וֹת יוּמַ֖ת הָרֹצֵֽחַ׃
ἐὰν δὲ ἐν σκεύει ξυλίνῳ ἐκ χειρὸς ἐξ οὗ ἀποθανεῖται ἐν αὐτῷ πατάξῃ αὐτόν, καὶ ἀποθάνῃ, φονευτής ἐστιν· θανάτῳ θανατούσθω ὁ φονευτής·
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Si ligno percussus interierit, percussoris sanguine vindicabitur.
O si la golpea con un palo de madera del tamaño suficiente como para matar a alguien, y la persona muere, es un asesino, y el asesino morirá.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y si con instrumento de palo de mano, de que pueda morir, lo hiriere, y muriere, homicida es; el homicida morirá.
If anyone has in his hand a deadly object of wood, and he strikes and kills another, he is a murderer; the murderer must surely be put to death.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Numbers 35:18 addresses the case of a person killed with a wooden hand-held object. If someone struck another with such an instrument and death resulted, the text names the striker a rotzeach ("killer/murderer", H7523) and states that this rotzeach must be put to death.
Key words
- kh.Li ("instrument of", H3627) — construct noun, meaning "an instrument of," grammatically bound to the following word to form a compound description of the weapon.
- 'etz ("wood of", H6086I) — construct noun continuing the chain, so kh.Li ... 'etz ... yad together describes a wooden object suited to the hand.
- yad ("hand", H3027O) — absolute noun completing the construct chain, specifying that the wooden object is hand-held/hand-wielded.
- hiKa ("he struck down", H5221) — Hiphil (causative) perfect, marking a completed causative act: the subject caused the blow to happen.
- roTzeach ("killer", H7523) — Qal participle, appearing twice (lines 14 and 19); as a participle it functions almost as a noun/label, identifying the striker by an ongoing category ("one who kills") rather than a single event.
- Mot yuMat ("certainly ... he will be put to death", H4191) — infinitive absolute (Mot) followed by the Hophal (causative passive) imperfect (yuMat) of the same root; this doubling is a Hebrew intensifying construction, reinforcing the certainty of the action.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence builds its weapon description through a three-word construct chain — kh.Li / 'etz / yad — literally "instrument of wood of hand," which functions as a single compound noun phrase meaning a wooden implement wielded by hand. This is followed by a relative clause, 'asher yaMut bo ("which someone will die by it"), specifying that the object is lethal by nature or use, before the narrative verbs describe the action: hiKa ("he struck") in the Hiphil perfect, then the narrative-vav form vaYaMot ("and he died") in the Qal.
The verse then labels the perpetrator using the participle roTzeach ("[is] a killer") rather than a finite verb, which frames the identification as a descriptive, ongoing designation rather than a single completed act. The final clause repeats this same participle, ha-roTzeach ("the killer"), now with the definite article, referring back to the person just identified. Between these two occurrences of roTzeach stands the infinitive absolute plus imperfect construction Mot yuMat, a grammatical device that intensifies the verb "to be put to death," expressing certainty or emphasis that Hebrew marks through verbal repetition rather than an adverb.
Differences between versions
The Vulgate condenses the weapon description to "ligno percussus" ("struck by wood"), omitting the explicit "hand" (yad) element present in the Hebrew construct chain and reflected in the LXX's "ἐκ χειρὸς" ("from hand"). The Vulgate's closing clause, "percussoris sanguine vindicabitur" ("he will be avenged by the blood of the striker"), differs structurally from the Hebrew's doubled rotzeach framing and the intensified "he will surely be put to death," expressing the outcome through vengeance/blood language rather than the infinitive-absolute emphasis on execution found in the Hebrew and rendered by the LXX as "θανάτῳ θανατούσθω" ("let him be put to death by death").
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.