Numbers 34:14
כִּי לָקְחוּ מַטֵּה בְנֵי הָראוּבֵנִי לְבֵית אֲבֹתָם וּמַטֵּה בְנֵֽי־הַגָּדִי לְבֵית אֲבֹתָם וַחֲצִי מַטֵּה מְנַשֶּׁה לָקְחוּ נַחֲלָתָֽם׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
כִּ֣י לָקְח֞וּ מַטֵּ֨ה בְנֵ֤י הָראוּבֵנִי֙ לְבֵ֣ית אֲבֹתָ֔ם וּמַטֵּ֥ה בְנֵֽי־הַגָּדִ֖י לְבֵ֣ית אֲבֹתָ֑ם וַחֲצִי֙ מַטֵּ֣ה מְנַשֶּׁ֔ה לָקְח֖וּ נַחֲלָתָֽם׃
ὅτι ἔλαβεν φυλὴ υἱῶν Ῥουβὴν καὶ φυλὴ υἱῶν Γὰδ κατ’ οἴκους πατριῶν αὐτῶν, καὶ τὸ ἥμισυ φυλῆς Μανασσὴ ἀπέλαβον τοὺς κλήρους αὐτῶν·
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Tribus enim filiorum Ruben per familias suas, et tribus filiorum Gad juxta cognationum numerum, media quoque tribus Manasse,
porque las familias de la tribu de Rubén, de la tribu de Gad y de la mitad de la tribu de Manasés ya han recibido su herencia.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Porque la tribu de los hijos de Rubén según las casas de sus padres, y la tribu de los hijos de Gad según las casas de sus padres, y la media tribu de Manasés, han tomado su herencia:
For the tribes of the Reubenites and Gadites, along with the half-tribe of Manasseh, have already received their inheritance.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Numbers 34:14 explains that the tribes of Reuben and Gad, along with half the tribe of Manasseh, had already received their territorial inheritance according to their ancestral houses, giving the reason (marked by ki) for how the remaining land is to be divided among the other tribes.
Key words
- ki ("for", H3588A) — subordinating particle opening a causal clause that grounds the instruction in a prior fact.
- laqechu ("they have taken", H3947H) — qal perfect, 3rd person plural, occurring twice; the perfect aspect marks completed action, showing these tribes' inheritance was already settled.
- matteh ("tribe of", H4294H) — masculine singular construct, used three times to introduce each tribal group.
- leveit 'avotam ("to the house of their fathers", H1004M + H0001G + H9028) — construct chain with pronominal suffix, denoting distribution organized by ancestral clan unit.
- nachalatam ("their inheritance", H5159 + H9028) — feminine singular construct with suffix, naming the allotted territorial possession; it appears only with the second occurrence of laqechu.
What the text says
The verse forms a causal clause (introduced by ki) built on two parallel statements sharing the verb laqechu ("they have taken") in the qal perfect. In the first statement, the subjects are matteh benei ha-Re'uveni ("the tribe of the sons of the Reubenite") and u-matteh benei ha-Gadi ("and the tribe of the sons of the Gadite"), each followed by le-veit 'avotam ("to the house of their fathers"). The gentilic terms ha-Re'uveni and ha-Gadi are grammatically singular with the definite article, functioning as collective names for the peoples, even though combined with the plural construct benei ("sons of").
The second statement repeats the same verb laqechu, now with chatzi matteh Menasheh ("half the tribe of Manasseh") as subject, followed directly by the object nachalatam ("their inheritance"). The object noun appears only after this second verb; the first occurrence of laqechu has no separate object stated, so the grammar leaves it unclear whether nachalatam is meant to cover the earlier clause as well.
Differences between versions
The LXX uses two different Greek verbs for the repeated Hebrew laqechu: elaben ("received") for Reuben and Gad, and apelabon ("received in turn") for Manasseh, where the Hebrew repeats the identical verb both times. The LXX also places the phrase corresponding to le-veit 'avotam — kat' oikous patrion auton — only once, after both Reuben and Gad together, rather than repeating it for each tribe as in the Hebrew. The Vulgate excerpt given lists the three groups (tribus filiorum Ruben, tribus filiorum Gad, media... tribus Manasse) without a visible main verb within this fragment, indicating the sentence structure there continues beyond the portion supplied.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.