Numbers 30:2

אִישׁ כִּֽי־יִדֹּר נֶדֶר לַֽיהוָה אֽוֹ־הִשָּׁבַע שְׁבֻעָה לֶאְסֹר אִסָּר עַל־נַפְשׁוֹ לֹא יַחֵל דְּבָרוֹ כְּכָל־הַיֹּצֵא מִפִּיו יַעֲשֶֽׂה׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

אִישׁ֩ כִּֽי־יִדֹּ֨ר נֶ֜דֶר לַֽיהוָ֗ה אֽוֹ־הִשָּׁ֤בַע שְׁבֻעָה֙ לֶאְסֹ֤ר אִסָּר֙ עַל־נַפְשׁ֔וֹ לֹ֥א יַחֵ֖ל דְּבָר֑וֹ כְּכָל־הַיֹּצֵ֥א מִפִּ֖יו יַעֲשֶֽׂה׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ἐλάλησεν Μωυσῆς πρὸς τοὺς ἄρχοντας τῶν φυλῶν ᾿Ισραὴλ λέγων τοῦτο τὸ ῥῆμα ὃ συνέταξεν Κύριος·

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Et locutus est ad principes tribuum filiorum Israël: Iste est sermo quem præcepit Dominus:

Spanish

Cuando un hombre le haga una promesa a Yehová, o haga un juramento obligándose a cumplir algo, no debe faltar a su palabra. Tiene que cumplir con todo lo que prometió.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Cuando alguno hiciere voto á Jehová, ó hiciere juramento ligando su alma con obligación, no violará su palabra: hará conforme á todo lo que salió de su boca.

(Num.30.3)

English

If a man makes a vow to the LORD or swears an oath to obligate himself by a pledge, he must not break his word; he must do everything he has promised.

What the text says

Summary

Numbers 30:2 establishes the legal principle that a man who makes a vow (neder, H5088) to Yehovah or binds himself by an oath (shevu'ah, H7621) is obligated to fulfill exactly what he has spoken. The verse states that such a person may not violate his word and must act according to everything that came out of his mouth.

Key words

  • yiddor ("he will vow", H5087) — qal imperfect, expressing a future/potential action: the conditional case being described.
  • neder ("a vow", H5088) — masculine singular noun, the specific term for a votive promise made to Yehovah.
  • hishava' ("he will swear", H7650) — niphal infinitive, a reflexive/passive verbal form indicating the act of binding oneself by oath.
  • le'sor 'issar ("to bind an obligation", H0631/H0632) — infinitive + cognate noun construction, doubling the root idea of "binding" to intensify the sense of self-imposed restriction.
  • yachel ("he will violate", H2490H) — hiphil imperfect, a causative form: the man would "cause profanation" of his own word if he fails to keep it.

What the text says

The verse opens with 'ish ("a man", H0376G) followed by the conditional particle ki ("if", H3588A), establishing a legal case format typical of this section of Numbers: "a man, if he vows... or swears...". Two parallel verbal constructions are joined by 'o ("or", H0176A): yiddor neder ("he will vow a vow") and hishava' shevu'ah ("he will swear an oath"), each pairing a finite verb with its cognate noun object — a common Hebrew intensifying pattern where the noun restates the verb's action.

The phrase le'sor 'issar 'al-nafsho ("to bind an obligation upon his soul/self") uses nafsho ("his self", H5315I with suffix H9023) in construct form, indicating that the obligation is imposed specifically upon the person's own being, not merely upon external action. The prohibition lo yachel devaro ("he will not violate his word") uses the hiphil of chalal (H2490H), a causative stem suggesting an active profaning or breaking, rather than a passive failure. The final clause, kekhol hayyotze mippiv ya'aseh ("according to all that has gone out from his mouth he shall do"), uses a qal participle (hayyotze, H3318O) to describe the utterance as something already "gone forth" — grammatically treating the spoken words as an accomplished object requiring subsequent action to match it.

Differences between versions

The LXX and Vulgate texts provided for this reference correspond to a different verse (Moses addressing the tribal leaders), while the Hebrew (TAHOT), RV1909, BSB, and SBLIBRE all render the legal content of the vow formula itself. This reflects a difference in versification between the Hebrew and Greek/Latin textual traditions at this point in Numbers 30, rather than a translation divergence within the same verse.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.