Numbers 3:51
וַיִּתֵּן מֹשֶׁה אֶת־כֶּסֶף הַפְּדוּיִם לְאַהֲרֹן וּלְבָנָיו עַל־פִּי יְהוָה כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוָּה יְהוָה אֶת־מֹשֶֽׁה׃ פ
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיִּתֵּ֨ן מֹשֶׁ֜ה אֶת־כֶּ֧סֶף הַפְּדוּיִ֛ם לְאַהֲרֹ֥ן וּלְבָנָ֖יו עַל־פִּ֣י יְהוָ֑ה כַּאֲשֶׁ֛ר צִוָּ֥ה יְהוָ֖ה אֶת־מֹשֶֽׁה׃ פ
καὶ ἔδωκεν Μωυσῆς τὰ λύτρα τῶν πλεοναζόντων λάρων καὶ τοῖς υἱοῖς αὐτοῦ, διὰ φωνῆς κυρίου, ὃν τρόπον συνέταξεν κύριος τῷ Μωυσῇ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
et dedit eam Aaron et filiis ejus juxta verbum quod præceperat sibi Dominus.
y Moisés le entregó el dinero del rescate a Aarón y a sus hijos, según la palabra de Yehová, tal como Yehová se lo ordenó a Moisés.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y Moisés dió el dinero de los rescates á Aarón y á sus hijos, conforme al dicho de Jehová, según que Jehová había mandado á Moisés.
And Moses gave the redemption money to Aaron and his sons in obedience to the word of the LORD, just as the LORD had commanded him.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Moses hands over the redemption money to Aaron and his sons, acting on the word of Yehovah, in accordance with what Yehovah had commanded him. The verse closes the census-and-redemption unit by confirming that the transaction was carried out exactly as ordered.
Key words
- va-yiTen ("and he gave", H5414) — qal narrative verb with vav, moving the story forward: this is the reported action that completes the preceding instructions.
- Kesef ha-pedu'im ("the money of the ransoms", H3701/H6302) — a construct chain: kesef ("money/silver") stands in construct to the definite plural noun pedu'im ("ransoms"), specifying exactly which money is meant — that collected as ransom.
- le-Aharon u-le-vanav ("to Aaron and to his sons", H0175/H1121A) — the preposition le ("to") marks the recipients; vanav is itself a construct form ("sons of...") carrying the pronominal suffix "his," referring back to Aaron.
- 'al-pi Yehovah ("on the mouth of Yehovah", H6310I/H3068G) — an idiomatic construct phrase using pi ("mouth of") to mean "according to the word/command of," expressing the authority behind Moses' action.
- tzivvah ("he had commanded", H6680) — piel perfect verb, denoting a completed, intensive act of command; paired with ka'asher ("just as," H0834D) it frames the whole verse as compliance with a prior directive.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence is built as a simple narrative report: subject (Moshe) + verb (va-yiten) + object ('et-kesef ha-pedu'im) + indirect recipients (le-Aharon u-le-vanav), followed by two clauses of justification introduced by 'al-pi Yehovah and ka'asher tzivvah Yehovah 'et-Moshe. The double reference to Yehovah's command — first as "the mouth of Yehovah" and then as "Yehovah commanded Moses" — creates a frame that brackets the action of giving with divine authorization at both its execution and its origin.
The construct chain kesef ha-pedu'im ties the money specifically to the redemption process described earlier in the chapter, rather than referring to money in general. The use of pi ("mouth of") rather than a more abstract term for "word" preserves a physical, oral image of command — the instruction as something spoken. The repetition of Moshe at both the beginning and the end of the verse (as giver and as one who received the command) forms a structural inclusio, framing him as the intermediary between the divine order and its execution.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders le-Aharon u-le-vanav ("to Aaron and to his sons") with a text that reads λάρων instead of the expected name; this appears to be a textual variant of "Aaron" rather than a different word choice. The Vulgate condenses the phrase into eam Aaron et filiis ejus ("it to Aaron and his sons"), omitting a separate rendering of 'al-pi Yehovah ("according to the mouth of Yehovah") and merging both command-clauses of the Hebrew into a single juxta verbum quod praeceperat, where the Hebrew keeps two distinct clauses ('al-pi Yehovah and ka'asher tzivvah).
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.