Numbers 3:1

וְאֵלֶּה תּוֹלְדֹת אַהֲרֹן וּמֹשֶׁה בְּיוֹם דִּבֶּר יְהוָה אֶת־מֹשֶׁה בְּהַר סִינָֽי׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְאֵ֛לֶּה תּוֹלְדֹ֥ת אַהֲרֹ֖ן וּמֹשֶׁ֑ה בְּי֗וֹם דִּבֶּ֧ר יְהוָ֛ה אֶת־מֹשֶׁ֖ה בְּהַ֥ר סִינָֽי׃

Greek (Septuagint)

Καὶ αὗται αἱ γενέσεις Ἀαρὼν καὶ Μωυσῆ, ἐν ᾗ ἡμέρᾳ ἐλάλησεν Κύριος τῷ Μωυσῇ ἐν ὄρει Σεινά.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Hæ sunt generationes Aaron et Moysi in die qua locutus est Dominus ad Moysen in monte Sinai.

Spanish

Esta es la historia de las generaciones de Aarón y Moisés en el día en que Yehová habló con Moisés en el monte Sinaí.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y ESTAS son las generaciones de Aarón y de Moisés, desde que Jehová habló á Moisés en el monte de Sinaí.

English

This is the account of Aaron and Moses at the time the LORD spoke with Moses on Mount Sinai.

What the text says

Summary

Numbers 3:1 opens a new section by introducing the toledot ("descendants/genealogy") of Aaron and Moses, situating this account temporally at the moment Yehovah spoke with Moses on Mount Sinai. The verse functions as a heading connecting the following genealogical material to the Sinai revelation narrative.

Key words

  • 'Elleh ("these", H0428) — demonstrative particle opening the verse, pointing forward to what follows, a common formulaic opener for genealogical or narrative sections in the Hebrew Bible.
  • tolDot ("[the] descendants of", H8435) — feminine plural noun in construct state, meaning it must be followed by a genitive; here it governs both 'ahaRon and moSheh, linking the term grammatically to both names as a compound construct chain.
  • diBer ("[when] he spoke", H1696G) — Piel perfect verb, third person masculine singular. The Piel stem here carries intensive/factitive force ("to speak" as a deliberate act of communication), and the perfect aspect marks the action as completed, anchoring the temporal clause introduced by beYom.
  • Yom ("[the] day of", H3117G) — masculine singular noun in construct state, forming with the following verbal clause a temporal expression equivalent to "on the day [that]..."
  • Har ("[the] mountain of", H2022G) — masculine singular construct noun, requiring the following proper name siNai to complete the phrase "mountain of Sinai."

What the text says

The verse begins with the conjunction ve ("and", H9002) plus the demonstrative 'Elleh, a standard formula introducing a new textual unit while linking it to what precedes. The construct noun tolDot takes two coordinated genitives, 'ahaRon and moSheh, joined by the conjunction u ("and", H9002). Grammatically, the construct chain does not distinguish whether the descendants belong equally to both figures or primarily to one with the other included by association; the Hebrew simply places both names as genitive complements of the same construct noun.

The temporal clause beYom diBer Yehovah 'et-moSheh behar siNai uses the construct noun Yom followed directly by a finite verb (diBer), a construction where the construct noun functions almost adverbially, meaning "on the day [when] X spoke," without an intervening relative particle in the Hebrew. The preposition 'et here (H0854, "with") marks the accompanying party of the speech-act, indicating Yehovah spoke with Moses rather than merely to him, though the same construction elsewhere in Hebrew can carry either nuance depending on context.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders tolDot as γενέσεις ("generations/origins"), and the Vulgate as generationes, both preserving the genealogical sense. However, the BSB gives "the account of Aaron and Moses," using "account" rather than "descendants" or "generations," a broader English rendering. The Vulgate and LXX both render 'et-moSheh with a simple dative/prepositional construction ("ad Moysen," "τῷ Μωυσῇ"), corresponding to "to Moses," whereas the Hebrew 'et (H0854) more literally denotes "with," a nuance the Latin and Greek here do not preserve.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.