Numbers 27:1
וַתִּקְרַבְנָה בְּנוֹת צְלָפְחָד בֶּן־חֵפֶר בֶּן־גִּלְעָד בֶּן־מָכִיר בֶּן־מְנַשֶּׁה לְמִשְׁפְּחֹת מְנַשֶּׁה בֶן־יוֹסֵף וְאֵלֶּה שְׁמוֹת בְּנֹתָיו מַחְלָה נֹעָה וְחָגְלָה וּמִלְכָּה וְתִרְצָֽה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַתִּקְרַ֜בְנָה בְּנ֣וֹת צְלָפְחָ֗ד בֶּן־חֵ֤פֶר בֶּן־גִּלְעָד֙ בֶּן־מָכִ֣יר בֶּן־מְנַשֶּׁ֔ה לְמִשְׁפְּחֹ֖ת מְנַשֶּׁ֣ה בֶן־יוֹסֵ֑ף וְאֵ֙לֶּה֙ שְׁמ֣וֹת בְּנֹתָ֔יו מַחְלָ֣ה נֹעָ֔ה וְחָגְלָ֥ה וּמִלְכָּ֖ה וְתִרְצָֽה׃
Καὶ π ροσελθοῦσαι αἱ θυγατέρες Σαλπαάδ υἰοῦ Ὅφερ υἱοῦ Γαλαὰδ υἱοῦ Μαχείρ, τοῦ δήμου Μανασσὴ τῶν υἱῶν ᾿Ιωσήφ, καὶ ταῦτα τὰ ὁνόματα αὐτῶν· Μάλα καὶ Νουὰ καὶ ῾Εγλὰ καὶ Μελχὰ καὶ Θερσά·
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Accesserunt autem filiæ Salphaad, filii Hepher, filii Galaad, filii Machir, filii Manasse, qui fuit filius Joseph: quarum sunt nomina, Maala, et Noa, et Hegla, et Melcha, et Thersa.
En ese tiempo, se acercaron las hijas de Zelofehad. Él era descendiente de Hefer, Galaad, Maquir, Manasés y José. Sus hijas se llamaban Maala, Noa, Hogla, Milca y Tirsa.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y LAS hijas de Salphaad, hijo de Hepher, hijo de Galaad, hijo de Machîr, hijo de Manasés, de las familias de Manasés, hijo de José, los nombres de las cuales eran Maala, y Noa, y Hogla, y Milca, y Tirsa, llegaron;
Now the daughters of Zelophehad son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, belonged to the clans of Manasseh son of Joseph. These were the names of his daughters: Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah. They approached
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse opens a narrative episode in which the daughters of Zelophehad approach (the leadership), identified through a five-generation patrilineal chain back to Joseph via the tribe of Manasseh. The verse closes by naming the five daughters explicitly: Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.
Key words
- tik.Ravnah ("they drew near", H7126G) — qal verb, feminine plural, with narrative vav; opens the sentence and marks the daughters as the grammatical subject of the action before any names are given.
- be.Not ("[the] daughters of", H1323G) — feminine plural construct; links the subject directly to the genealogical chain that follows, deferring the personal names until later in the verse.
- ben ("[the] son of", H1121A) — masculine singular construct, repeated four times (Che.fer, gil.'Ad, ma.Khir, me.na.Sheh); each repetition adds one ascending generation, building an unbroken paternal line from Zelophehad to Manasseh.
- le.mishpe.Chot ("of the clans of", H9005+H4940) — preposition plus feminine plural construct; attaches the whole genealogical line to the clan structure of Manasseh, situating the daughters within a tribal-administrative framework rather than only a family one.
- 'E.leh ("these", H0428) — demonstrative particle introducing the naming clause ('elleh shemot benotav, "these are the names of his daughters"), which pauses the main narrative action to itemize the five individuals.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence begins with the finite verb tik.Ravnah ("they drew near"), immediately followed by its subject benot Tzelofchad ("daughters of Zelophehad"). Between the subject and the resumption of narrative action (which continues in the following verse), the text inserts an extended construct chain of ben ("son of") links — Hepher, Gilead, Makir, Manasseh — tracing Zelophehad's paternal line back through four generations to Manasseh son of Joseph. This chain is followed by a prepositional phrase, le.mishpe.Chot Menashsheh ben Yosef ("of the clans of Manasseh son of Joseph"), which classifies the family within the larger clan structure of the tribe.
After the genealogy, a second clause is introduced with the conjunction ve and the demonstrative 'elleh: "and these are the names of his daughters" (shemot benotav, using the construct noun shemot, "names of"). This clause functions as an explanatory aside, naming Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah before the main narrative verb's action is carried forward. The feminine plural form of the initial verb tik.Ravnah signals from the outset that the group approaching is composed of women, even though their individual names are withheld until the genealogical identification is complete.
Differences between versions
The LXX and Vulgate render the proper names with different transliterations than the Masoretic vocalization: Tzelofchad becomes Salpaad/Salphaad, Chefer becomes Opher/Hepher, and the daughters' names appear as Mala, Noua, Hegla, Melcha, Thersa (LXX) and Maala, Noa, Hegla, Melcha, Thersa (Vulgate), diverging in spelling from the Hebrew Mach.Lah, No.'Ah, Chag.Lah, Mil.Kah, Tir.Tzah. The LXX renders le.mishpe.Chot Menashsheh ("of the clans of Manasseh") as τοῦ δήμου Μανασσή ("of the people/tribe of Manasseh"), using a singular collective noun where the Hebrew has a plural construct mishpechot ("clans").
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.