Numbers 24:8
אֵל מוֹצִיאוֹ מִמִּצְרַיִם כְּתוֹעֲפֹת רְאֵם לוֹ יֹאכַל גּוֹיִם צָרָיו וְעַצְמֹתֵיהֶם יְגָרֵם וְחִצָּיו יִמְחָֽץ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
אֵ֚ל מוֹצִיא֣וֹ מִמִּצְרַ֔יִם כְּתוֹעֲפֹ֥ת רְאֵ֖ם ל֑וֹ יֹאכַ֞ל גּוֹיִ֣ם צָרָ֗יו וְעַצְמֹתֵיהֶ֛ם יְגָרֵ֖ם וְחִצָּ֥יו יִמְחָֽץ׃
θεὸς ὡδήγησεν αὐτὸν ἐξ Αἰγύπτου, ὡς δόξα μονοκέρωτος αὐτῶ· ἔδεται ἔθνη ἐχθρῶν αὐτοῦ, καὶ τὰ πάχη αὐτῶν ἐκμυελιεῖν, καὶ ταῖς βολίσιν αὐτοῦ κατατοξεύσει ἐχθρόν.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Deus eduxit illum de Ægypto, cujus fortitudo similis est rhinocerotis. Devorabunt gentes hostes illius, ossaque eorum confringent, et perforabunt sagittis.
Dios los sacó de Egipto; son tan fuertes como un toro salvaje. Israel devorará a las naciones enemigas; les romperá los huesos y los atravesará con sus flechas.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Dios lo sacó de Egipto; tiene fuerzas como de unicornio: comerá á las gentes sus enemigas, y desmenuzará sus huesos, y asaeteará con sus saetas.
God brought him out of Egypt with strength like a wild ox, to devour hostile nations and crush their bones, to pierce them with arrows.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse describes God bringing a subject (grammatically "him," referring to Israel as a collective) out of Egypt, compares this subject's power to the horns of a wild ox, and describes it consuming hostile nations, breaking their bones, and piercing them with arrows.
Key words
- moti'o ("bringing him out", H3318) — hiphil (causative) participle with pronominal suffix; the participle form frames this as an ongoing or characteristic action of God ("the one who brings him out") rather than a single past event.
- to'afot ("horns of", H8443) — feminine plural construct; used figuratively to convey strength, paired with re'em ("wild ox", H7214) in a comparison of power.
- yokhal ("it will consume", H0398) — qal imperfect, third person masculine singular; grammatically the subject is not repeated here, so the "it/he" that acts is inferred from the earlier singular participle moti'o.
- yegarem ("it will break", H1633) — piel (intensive) imperfect; the piel stem intensifies the action of breaking, applied to atzmoteihem ("their bones", H6106), whose suffix is plural ("their"), referring to the nations.
- yimchatz ("it will wound", H4272) — qal imperfect, closing the sequence of three parallel singular-subject verbs (yokhal, yegarem, yimchatz) that describe the same singular agent acting on plural enemies.
What the text says
The sentence opens with El ("God", H0410) as the explicit subject of the participle moti'o, establishing that the bringing-out from Egypt is God's action, directed toward a third-person singular object ("him"). The comparison ke-to'afot re'em lo ("like the horns of a wild ox, to him") attaches strength imagery to this same singular referent through the suffix lo ("to him").
The three following verbs — yokhal, yegarem, yimchatz — are all third-person masculine singular imperfects, maintaining grammatical continuity with the singular subject established earlier, while their objects (goyim tzarav "nations, his adversaries"; atzmoteihem "their bones") are plural. This creates a pattern where a singular collective agent (readable as Israel, referenced through the third-person suffixes attached to moti'o and lo) acts upon multiple plural enemies. The suffixes shift between "his" (tzarav, chitzav) and "their" (atzmoteihem), consistently marking the enemies as plural while the acting subject remains singular throughout.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders to'afot ("horns of") as doxa ("glory") rather than a term for horns or strength directly. Where the Hebrew verbs yokhal, yegarem, yimchatz are all third-person singular, the Vulgate uses plural verbs (devorabunt, confringent, perforabunt — "they will devour... they will break... they will pierce"), shifting the grammatical number of the acting subject from singular to plural. The LXX also renders yegarem ("it will break [bones]") with ekmyelieîn ("to suck out the marrow"), a different image from the Hebrew's breaking of bones.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.