Numbers 23:13
וַיֹּאמֶר אֵלָיו בָּלָק לְכָה נָּא אִתִּי אֶל־מָקוֹם אַחֵר אֲשֶׁר תִּרְאֶנּוּ מִשָּׁם אֶפֶס קָצֵהוּ תִרְאֶה וְכֻלּוֹ לֹא תִרְאֶה וְקָבְנוֹ־לִי מִשָּֽׁם׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיֹּ֨אמֶר אֵלָ֜יו בָּלָ֗ק לְכָה נָּ֨א אִתִּ֜י אֶל־מָק֤וֹם אַחֵר֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר תִּרְאֶ֣נּוּ מִשָּׁ֔ם אֶ֚פֶס קָצֵ֣הוּ תִרְאֶ֔ה וְכֻלּ֖וֹ לֹ֣א תִרְאֶ֑ה וְקָבְנוֹ־לִ֖י מִשָּֽׁם׃
καὶ εἶπεν πρὸς αὐτὸν Βαλάκ Δεῦρο ἔτι μετ’ ἐμοῦ εἰς τόπον ἄλλον, ἐξ ὧν οὐκ ὄψῃ αὐτὸν ἐκεῖθεν, ἀλλ’ ἢ μέρος τι αὐτοῦ ὄψη, πάντας δὲ οὐ μὴ ἴδῃς· καὶ κατάρασαί μοι αὐτὸν ἐκεῖθεν.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Dixit ergo Balac: Veni mecum in alterum locum unde partem Israël videas, et totum videre non possis: inde maledicito ei.
Balac le dijo: “Por favor, ven conmigo a otro lugar desde donde puedas verlos. Solo podrás ver a una parte del pueblo, no a todos. Maldícelos desde allí por mí”.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y dijo Balac: Ruégote que vengas conmigo á otro lugar desde el cual lo veas; su extremidad solamente verás, que no lo verás todo; y desde allí me lo maldecirás.
Then Balak said to him, “Please come with me to another place where you can see them. You will only see the outskirts of their camp— not all of them. And from there, curse them for me.”
✦ What the text says
Summary
Balak invites Balaam to another location, telling him that from there he will see only "its edge" (a portion of the people) rather than the whole company, and asks him to curse it from that vantage point.
Key words
- lekha ("come", H1980H) — qal imperative with paragogic he attached, an intensified or emphatic form of the command "go/come."
- na' ("please", H4994) — a particle of entreaty softening the imperative, marking polite request rather than bare command.
- qatzehu ("its edge/outskirt", H7097A) — masculine singular noun in construct state with a 3ms pronominal suffix ("edge of it"), referring back to the collective entity being viewed.
- kullo ("all of it", H3605) — construct noun with 3ms suffix, paired with the negation lo' ("not", H3808) to state that the totality will not be seen.
- tir'ennu ("you will see it", H7200G) — qal imperfect 2ms with 3ms object suffix, repeated three times in the verse (vv. 13, twice more as tir'eh) to structure the contrast between partial and full sight.
What the text says
The verse is built as direct speech introduced by va-yo'mer ("and he said", H0559), a standard narrative-vav construction. Balak's proposal moves through a sequence of three parallel imperfect verbs from the root ra'ah ("to see", H7200G): first a general "you will see it" tied to the new location (asher tir'ennu mi-sham, "where you will see it from there"), then a restrictive clause built on the construct noun qatzehu ("its edge") plus tir'eh, and finally the negated counterpart ve-khullo lo' tir'eh ("and all of it you will not see"). This triple repetition of the same verb root with different objects (edge vs. totality) creates a grammatical contrast entirely carried by construct-suffix nouns rather than separate adjectives — Hebrew expresses "partial" and "total" through qatzeh + suffix and kol + suffix, both governed by the same seeing-verb.
The final clause, ve-qovno-li mi-sham ("and curse it for me from there", H6895 imperative + H9005 preposition-suffix "for me" + H8033G "from there"), closes the speech with another imperative, echoing the lekha ("come") of the opening and framing the verse as a request-and-command pair: come — see partially — curse. The 3ms suffixes throughout (-nu, -hu, -o) all refer to a single grammatical object treated as a collective singular, though what is being seen/cursed is a group of people.
Differences between versions
The Vulgate specifies the object explicitly as "Israel" (unde partem Israël videas), a proper name not present in the Hebrew text, which uses only pronominal suffixes ("it/him"). The LXX and modern English translations (BSB, SBLIBRE) render the same suffixes with plural pronouns ("them"), treating the Hebrew masculine singular collective as a plural group, while the Hebrew grammatical number itself remains singular throughout.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.