Numbers 22:41

וַיְהִי בַבֹּקֶר וַיִּקַּח בָּלָק אֶת־בִּלְעָם וַֽיַּעֲלֵהוּ בָּמוֹת בָּעַל וַיַּרְא מִשָּׁם קְצֵה הָעָֽם׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיְהִ֣י בַבֹּ֔קֶר וַיִּקַּ֤ח בָּלָק֙ אֶת־בִּלְעָ֔ם וַֽיַּעֲלֵ֖הוּ בָּמ֣וֹת בָּ֑עַל וַיַּ֥רְא מִשָּׁ֖ם קְצֵ֥ה הָעָֽם׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ἐγενήθη πρωί, καὶ παραλαβὼν Βαλὰκ τὸν Βαλαὰμ ἀνεβίβασεν αὐτὸν ἐπὶ τὴν στήλην τοῦ Βάαλ, καὶ ἔδειξεν αὐτῶ ἐκεῖθεν μέρος τι τοῦ λαοῦ.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Mane autem facto, duxit eum ad excelsa Baal, et intuitus est extremam partem populi.

Spanish

A la mañana siguiente, Balac llevó a Balaam a los cerros consagrados a Baal, desde donde pudo ver a una parte del pueblo de Israel.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y el día siguiente Balac tomó á Balaam, é hízolo subir á los altos de Baal, y desde allí vió la extremidad del pueblo.

English

The next morning, Balak took Balaam and brought him up to Bamoth-baal. From there he could see the outskirts of the camp of the people.

What the text says

Summary

The verse narrates a sequence of morning actions: Balak takes Balaam, brings him up to the place called Bamoth-Baal, and someone sees a portion of the people from that height. The sentence is built entirely as a chain of consecutive narrative verbs typical of Biblical Hebrew storytelling.

Key words

  • va-yehi ("and it was", H1961) — narrative vav + qal verb, opening formula marking a new episode ("and it came to pass").
  • va-yiqqach ("and he took", H3947G) — qal narrative, third-person masculine, continues the chain of sequential actions begun by va-yehi.
  • va-ya'aleHU ("and he brought him up", H5927H) — hiphil (causative) narrative verb with attached object suffix hu ("him", H9033): Balak causes Balaam to ascend.
  • va-yar' ("and he saw", H7200G) — qal narrative verb, third-person masculine singular, no explicit subject noun given, continuing the same chain.
  • qetzeh ("edge/outskirts of", H7097A) — masculine singular noun in construct state, linking to ha-'am ("the people", H5971A) to form "the edge of the people."

What the text says

The verse is a single continuous narrative chain, each clause opened by the vav-consecutive form (va- + prefixed verb), producing the typical "and then... and then..." rhythm of Hebrew narrative prose. The subject shifts are marked only by verb agreement (all third-person masculine singular) and by the explicit proper names Balak (H1111) and Bilʿam (H1109A) introduced with the direct-object marker 'et (H0853) before Bilʿam, showing that Balak is the one performing the action of "taking" and "bringing up," while Balaam is the one acted upon.

The final verb va-yar' ("and he saw", H7200G) has no explicit subject noun in the Hebrew; grammatically it continues the same subject sequence as the prior verbs (Balak), though the referent could shift and is not clarified by an added proper noun. What is seen is described with a construct chain, qetzeh ha-'am ("the edge of the people", H7097A + H5971A), meaning literally "the outskirts/edge of the people," a partial, limited view rather than the whole community.

Differences between versions

The Hebrew place name Bamot Baal (H1120H + H1168I, "Bamoth-Baal") is rendered in the LXX as στήλην τοῦ Βάαλ ("the pillar/stele of Baal"), interpreting the place name as a physical structure rather than preserving it as a toponym; the Vulgate gives "excelsa Baal" ("the heights of Baal"), which also does not transliterate the name but describes it descriptively.

For the final verb, the Hebrew va-yar' ("and he saw", H7200G) has an unspecified subject continuing the narrative chain, while the LXX shifts to ἔδειξεν ("he showed"), introducing an explicit causative action (someone showing Balaam something) not present as such in the Hebrew verb form. The Vulgate's "intuitus est" ("he gazed/looked upon") aligns more closely with the Hebrew "saw." Additionally, for qetzeh ha-'am ("edge of the people"), the LXX has μέρος τι τοῦ λαοῦ ("a certain part of the people"), a looser rendering than the Hebrew's more specific "edge/extremity," while the Vulgate's "extremam partem populi" ("the extreme part of the people") stays closer to the Hebrew construct sense.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.