Numbers 22:38
וַיֹּאמֶר בִּלְעָם אֶל־בָּלָק הִֽנֵּה־בָאתִי אֵלֶיךָ עַתָּה הֲיָכוֹל אוּכַל דַּבֵּר מְאוּמָה הַדָּבָר אֲשֶׁר יָשִׂים אֱלֹהִים בְּפִי אֹתוֹ אֲדַבֵּֽר׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיֹּ֨אמֶר בִּלְעָ֜ם אֶל־בָּלָ֗ק הִֽנֵּה־בָ֙אתִי֙ אֵלֶ֔יךָ עַתָּ֕ה הֲיָכ֥וֹל אוּכַ֖ל דַּבֵּ֣ר מְא֑וּמָה הַדָּבָ֗ר אֲשֶׁ֨ר יָשִׂ֧ים אֱלֹהִ֛ים בְּפִ֖י אֹת֥וֹ אֲדַבֵּֽר׃
καὶ εἶπεν Βαλαὰμ πρὸς Βαλάκ ἰδοὺ ῆκω πρὸς σὲ νῦν· δυνατὸς ἔσομαι λαλῆσαί τι; τὸ ῥῆμα ὃ ἐὰν βάλῃ ὁ θεὸς εἰς τὸ στόμα μου, τοῦτο λαλήσω.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Cui ille respondit: Ecce adsum: numquid loqui potero aliud, nisi quod Deus posuerit in ore meo?
Balaam le contestó: “Pues aquí me tienes, ya llegué. Pero no te hagas ilusiones, porque yo no puedo decir lo que se me antoje. Solo podré decir las palabras que Dios ponga en mi boca”.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y Balaam respondió á Balac: He aquí yo he venido á ti: mas ¿ podré ahora hablar alguna cosa? La palabra que Dios pusiere en mi boca, esa hablaré.
“ See, I have come to you,” Balaam replied, “ but can I say just anything? I must speak only the word that God puts in my mouth.”
✦ What the text says
Summary
Balaam replies to Balak that although he has come as summoned, he cannot speak freely: he can only pronounce the word that God places in his mouth. The Hebrew stresses this limitation through an emphatic verbal construction and a fronted object clause.
Key words
- ya.Khol ("certainly ", H3201) — infinitive absolute of the same root as the following verb; it reinforces or questions the verb's force, producing an idiom often rendered "am I able at all?"
- 'u.Khal ("am I able", H3201) — imperfect form paired with the infinitive absolute above; together they form a single intensified question about capacity.
- da.Var ("word", H1697) — definite noun ha.Davar ("the word"), placed at the front of its clause before the relative pronoun, marking it as the topic of the sentence.
- ya.Sim ("he will put", H7760) — imperfect verb describing a future/repeated action of God placing words in the mouth.
- 'a.da.Ber ("I will speak", H1696G) — piel imperfect, intensive stem, appearing at the very end of the sentence after the fronted object, so that the verb arrives only after its object has been named.
What the text says
The sentence divides into two parts. The first is Balaam's statement of arrival, hi.neh-va.ti 'e.Lei.kha ("here — I have come to you"), followed by the paired construction ha.ya.Khol 'u.Khal ("certainly-able am-I-able"). This doubling of the same root (infinitive absolute + imperfect) is a common Biblical Hebrew pattern that intensifies the verb; combined with the interrogative particle ha (H9008), it frames the question as emphatic — not merely "can I speak" but something closer to "am I truly able to speak anything at all?"
The second part restructures normal word order. The definite object ha.Davar 'a.Sher yaSim 'Elohim beFi ("the word that God puts in my mouth") stands before the verb 'adaBer ("I will speak"). Hebrew resumes this fronted object with the suffixed pronoun 'oTo ("it," attached to the object marker H0853), technically not required grammatically but making the fronting explicit: "the word ... it I will speak." This front-loading of the object is a stylistic device unavailable to translations that must follow subject-verb-object order; it places rhetorical weight on "the word" before naming the act of speaking it.
Differences between versions
The LXX turns the infinitive-absolute construction into a straightforward future statement with a question mark, δυνατὸς ἔσομαι λαλῆσαί τι ("will I be able to speak anything?"), losing the doubled-root intensification found in the Hebrew. It also renders yaSim ("he will put") as βάλῃ ("throws/casts"), a different verb of placement. The Vulgate restructures the second clause negatively — "can I speak anything else, except what God has put" — introducing a nisi ("except") construction not present in the Hebrew, which instead uses a simple relative clause with a fronted object.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.