Numbers 21:9
וַיַּעַשׂ מֹשֶׁה נְחַשׁ נְחֹשֶׁת וַיְשִׂמֵהוּ עַל־הַנֵּס וְהָיָה אִם־נָשַׁךְ הַנָּחָשׁ אֶת־אִישׁ וְהִבִּיט אֶל־נְחַשׁ הַנְּחֹשֶׁת וָחָֽי׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיַּ֤עַשׂ מֹשֶׁה֙ נְחַ֣שׁ נְחֹ֔שֶׁת וַיְשִׂמֵ֖הוּ עַל־הַנֵּ֑ס וְהָיָ֗ה אִם־נָשַׁ֤ךְ הַנָּחָשׁ֙ אֶת־אִ֔ישׁ וְהִבִּ֛יט אֶל־נְחַ֥שׁ הַנְּחֹ֖שֶׁת וָחָֽי׃
καὶ ἐποίησεν Μωυσῆς ὄφιν χαλκοῦν, καὶ ἔστησεν αὐτὸν ἐπὶ σημείου· καὶ ἐγένετο ὅταν ἔδακνεν ὄφις ἄνθρωπον, καὶ ἐπέβλεψεν ἐπὶ τὸν ὄφιν τὸν χαλκοῦν, καὶ
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Fecit ergo Moyses serpentem æneum, et posuit eum pro signo: quem cum percussi aspicerent, sanabantur.
Moisés hizo una serpiente de bronce y la puso sobre el poste. Y sucedía que, si una serpiente mordía a alguien, esa persona miraba a la serpiente de bronce y se salvaba.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y Moisés hizo una serpiente de metal, y púsola sobre la bandera: y fué, que cuando alguna serpiente mordía á alguno, miraba á la serpiente de metal, y vivía.
So Moses made a bronze snake and mounted it on a pole. If anyone who was bitten looked at the bronze snake, he would live. The Journey to Moab
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse describes Moses making a bronze snake and setting it on a standard, establishing a conditional pattern: whenever a snake had bitten a person, looking at the bronze snake resulted in that person living. The verse moves from a single completed act (making, placing) to a repeated conditional sequence (biting, looking, living).
Key words
- nechash ("snake of", H5175) — construct form, meaning it must be paired with the following noun; it does not stand alone as "snake" but as "snake of [bronze]".
- nechoshet ("bronze", H5178A) — feminine singular noun functioning as the construct's second element, specifying the material of the nechash.
- nes ("standard", H5251H) — masculine singular noun with definite article ha, identifying a specific pole or banner already established as the standard in context.
- hibbit ("he looked", H5027) — hiphil (causative) stem, sequential perfect; the hiphil here conveys directed, intentional looking rather than a passive glance.
- chai ("he lived", H2421) — qal sequential perfect, closing the conditional chain; grammatically it continues the "if... then" sequence begun by haYah ("it was", H1961).
What the text says
The verse divides into two grammatical units. The first (words 1–11) is straightforward narrative: two verbs in the qal narrative form — ya'as ("he made", H6213H) and yasem ("he put", H7760A) — report Moses' single, completed actions of making the bronze snake and placing it on the nes. The construct phrase nechash nechoshet ("snake of bronze") functions almost as a compound noun, "a bronze snake," with nechoshet specifying the material.
The second unit (words 12–27) shifts into a conditional structure introduced by haYah ("it was") plus 'im ("if", H0518A). This is not a single past event but a generalized, repeatable condition: if the snake (ha-nachash) bit 'ish ("anyone", H0376I — a generic singular standing for any person), then the person looked (hibbit, hiphil) toward the nechash ha-nechoshet ("the bronze snake," now with definite article on nechoshet, marking it as the specific object already introduced) and lived (chai). The verbs in this second half are all sequential perfects, a form that in Biblical Hebrew narrates a chain of consequence rather than isolated single events — reinforcing that this looking-and-living pattern occurred repeatedly, not once.
Differences between versions
The Vulgate renders the outcome as "sanabantur" ("they were healed"), using a plural passive verb, where the Hebrew chai ("he lived", H2421) is singular and means "lived" rather than "was healed." The Vulgate also treats the afflicted as plural ("percussi," "those struck"), while the Hebrew uses the singular 'ish ("anyone") as a generic reference to any individual person. The LXX uses ὅταν ("whenever") to render the Hebrew conditional 'im ("if"), and its provided text breaks off before completing the final clause corresponding to va-chai ("and he lived").
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.