Numbers 21:3

וַיִּשְׁמַע יְהוָה בְּקוֹל יִשְׂרָאֵל וַיִּתֵּן אֶת־הַֽכְּנַעֲנִי וַיַּחֲרֵם אֶתְהֶם וְאֶת־עָרֵיהֶם וַיִּקְרָא שֵׁם־הַמָּקוֹם חָרְמָֽה׃ פ

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיִּשְׁמַ֨ע יְהוָ֜ה בְּק֣וֹל יִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל וַיִּתֵּן֙ אֶת־הַֽכְּנַעֲנִ֔י וַיַּחֲרֵ֥ם אֶתְהֶ֖ם וְאֶת־עָרֵיהֶ֑ם וַיִּקְרָ֥א שֵׁם־הַמָּק֖וֹם חָרְמָֽה׃ פ

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ εἰσἠκουσεν κύριος τῆς φωνῆς Ἰσραὴλ καὶ παρέδωκεν τὸν χανανεὶ αὐτοῦ· καὶ ἀνεθεμάτισεν αὐτὸν καὶ τὰς πόλεις αὐτοῦ, καὶ ἐπ’ τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ τόπου ἐκείνου Ἀνάθεμα.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Exaudivitque Dominus preces Israël, et tradidit Chananæum, quem ille interfecit subversis urbibus ejus: et vocavit nomen loci illius Horma, id est, anathema.

Spanish

Yehová escuchó la petición de Israel y les entregó a los cananeos; y los israelitas los destruyeron por completo a ellos y a sus ciudades. Por eso, ese lugar fue llamado Horma.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y Jehová escuchó la voz de Israel, y entregó al Cananeo, y destruyólos á ellos y á sus ciudades; y llamó el nombre de aquel lugar Horma.

English

And the LORD heard Israel ’s plea and delivered up the Canaanites. Israel devoted them and their cities to destruction; so they named the place Hormah. The Bronze Serpent

What the text says

Summary

The verse reports that Yehovah heard Israel's voice (a plea, in context), handed over the Canaanite population, and that they were destroyed along with their cities. The place is then named Hormah, a name built on the same root as the verb for total destruction used earlier in the verse.

Key words

  • va-yishma' ("he listened", H8085) — qal narrative form; opens the verse with YHWH as subject responding to what precedes.
  • be-qol Yisra'el ("to the voice of Israel", H6963A + H3478) — construct chain, "voice of Israel," the object of the listening.
  • va-yitten ("he delivered up", H5414) — qal narrative, continues YHWH as subject, handing over ha-kena'ani ("the Canaanite", H3669A), grammatically singular though referring to a people.
  • va-yacharem ("it/he totally destroyed", H2763) — hiphil (causative) narrative form; the subject is not named by a separate noun, only carried in the verb's third-person masculine singular inflection.
  • Chormah ("Hormah", H2767) — proper name sharing the same consonantal root (ח-ר-ם) as yacharem, so the place-name embeds the verb's meaning.

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence is a tight chain of four narrative (vav-consecutive) verbs — yishma', yitten, yacharem, yiqra' — each pushing the story forward in sequence: YHWH heard, YHWH delivered, [subject] destroyed, [subject] called. The grammatical subject of yacharem ("he/it totally destroyed") is not restated as a noun; it is carried only by the verb's masculine singular form, leaving open whether the acting subject is understood as Israel (continuing collectively from qol Yisra'el) or as a continuation of YHWH as agent through Israel. The direct objects 'et-hem ("them", H0853 + H9038) and 'et-'arei-hem ("their cities", H0853 + H5892B + H9028) are both plural, referring back to the Canaanite population and its cities even though ha-kena'ani itself was grammatically singular (a collective gentilic).

The closing clause plays on the root ח-ר-ם: the same consonants that form the verb yacharem ("totally destroy," H2763) reappear in the place-name Chormah (H2767), so the naming etymologically encodes the preceding action.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders the destroyed party with a singular pronoun (τὸν χανανεὶ αὐτοῦ, "his/its Canaanite," and ἀνεθεμάτισεν αὐτόν, "he destroyed him"), preserving grammatical number as singular, where the Hebrew 'et-hem is explicitly plural ("them"). The LXX and Vulgate both make explicit in translation what the Hebrew name Chormah implies: LXX gives the place the Greek name Ἀνάθεμα ("Anathema"), and the Vulgate glosses "Horma, id est, anathema" ("Horma, that is, anathema"), spelling out the root-play that in Hebrew is left implicit in the sound of the name itself.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.