Numbers 21:23
וְלֹא־נָתַן סִיחֹן אֶת־יִשְׂרָאֵל עֲבֹר בִּגְבֻלוֹ וַיֶּאֱסֹף סִיחֹן אֶת־כָּל־עַמּוֹ וַיֵּצֵא לִקְרַאת יִשְׂרָאֵל הַמִּדְבָּרָה וַיָּבֹא יָהְצָה וַיִּלָּחֶם בְּיִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְלֹא־נָתַ֨ן סִיחֹ֣ן אֶת־יִשְׂרָאֵל֮ עֲבֹ֣ר בִּגְבֻלוֹ֒ וַיֶּאֱסֹ֨ף סִיחֹ֜ן אֶת־כָּל־עַמּ֗וֹ וַיֵּצֵ֞א לִקְרַ֤את יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ הַמִּדְבָּ֔רָה וַיָּבֹ֖א יָ֑הְצָה וַיִּלָּ֖חֶם בְּיִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃
καὶ οὐκ ἔδωκεν Σηὼν τῷ Ἰσραὴλ παρελθεῖν διὰ τῶν ὁρίων αὐτοῦ· καὶ συνήγαγεν Σηὼν πάντα τὸν λαὸν αὐτοῦ, καὶ ἐξῆλθεν παρατάξασθαι Ἰσραὴλ εἰς τὴν ἔρημον· καὶ ἦλθεν εἰς Εἴσσα, καὶ παρετάξατο τῷ Ἰσραήλ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Qui concedere noluit ut transiret Israël per fines suos: quin potius exercitu congregato, egressus est obviam in desertum, et venit in Jasa, pugnavitque contra eum.
Pero Sehón no le permitió a Israel cruzar por su territorio. Al contrario, reunió a todo su ejército y salió al desierto para atacar a Israel; al llegar a Jahaz, se enfrentó a ellos.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Mas Sehón no dejó pasar á Israel por su término: antes juntó Sehón todo su pueblo, y salió contra Israel en el desierto: y vino á Jahaz, y peleó contra Israel.
But Sihon would not let Israel pass through his territory. Instead, he gathered his whole army and went out to confront Israel in the wilderness. When he came to Jahaz, he fought against Israel.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse narrates Sihon's refusal to let Israel cross his territory, followed by his military mobilization: he gathered his people, marched into the wilderness to confront Israel, reached Jahaz, and fought against them there.
Key words
- natan ("he permitted", H5414K) — qal perfect, a completed action negated by lo' ("not", H3808); Sihon's refusal is presented as a settled fact, not an ongoing process.
- 'avor ("to pass", H5674A) — qal infinitive construct, functioning as the object of what Sihon did not permit: "he did not give Israel [permission] to pass."
- ya'esof ("he gathered", H0622) — qal narrative form (vav-consecutive), the first of a chain of sequential actions that follow the initial refusal.
- liqrat ("to meet", H7122H) — qal infinitive with the preposition li ("to", H9005), expressing purpose: Sihon went out "in order to meet/confront" Israel.
- yillachem ("he engaged in battle", H3898A) — niphal narrative form; the niphal stem here conveys a reciprocal/engaged sense ("to fight," i.e., mutual combat) rather than a simple active verb.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence structure opens with a negated perfect verb, lo' natan ("he did not permit"), establishing Sihon's initial stance before any narrative action begins. The object of the infinitive 'avor ("to pass") is Israel, marked by the direct object particle 'et (H0853), and the phrase bi-gvul-o ("in his territory") specifies where passage was denied, using the construct noun gevul ("territory", H1366H) with a third-person suffix "his."
After this initial statement, the text shifts into a chain of four narrative (vav-consecutive) verbs: ya'esof ("he gathered"), yetze' ("he went out", H3318G), yavo' ("he came", H0935G), and yillachem ("he engaged in battle"). This chain marks sequential, discrete actions in the story's timeline, each introduced by the narrative vav (H9001), which in Biblical Hebrew signals "and then" rather than simple coordination. Directional he suffixes appear twice — on midbarah ("wilderness," H4057B + H9011) and Yahtzah ("Jahaz," H3096 + H9011) — indicating motion toward these locations, a grammatical feature not always visible in translation but present in the Hebrew morphology itself. The final verb, yillachem, is in the niphal stem, which the grammar marks as passive/reflexive, here understood as mutual engagement in combat ("he fought" in the sense of "he became engaged in battle") rather than a simple active strike.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the place name as Εἴσσα ("Eissa") where the Hebrew has Yahtzah ("Jahaz", H3096), a divergence in the transliteration/rendering of the toponym. The Vulgate uses Jasa for the same place name, differing again from both the Hebrew form and the LXX's Eissa.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.