Numbers 21:13
מִשָּׁם נָסָעוּ וַֽיַּחֲנוּ מֵעֵבֶר אַרְנוֹן אֲשֶׁר בַּמִּדְבָּר הַיֹּצֵא מִגְּבוּל הָֽאֱמֹרִי כִּי אַרְנוֹן גְּבוּל מוֹאָב בֵּין מוֹאָב וּבֵין הָאֱמֹרִֽי׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
מִשָּׁם֮ נָסָעוּ֒ וַֽיַּחֲנ֗וּ מֵעֵ֤בֶר אַרְנוֹן֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר בַּמִּדְבָּ֔ר הַיֹּצֵ֖א מִגְּב֣וּל הָֽאֱמֹרִ֑י כִּ֤י אַרְנוֹן֙ גְּב֣וּל מוֹאָ֔ב בֵּ֥ין מוֹאָ֖ב וּבֵ֥ין הָאֱמֹרִֽי׃
ἐκεῖθεν ἀπάραντες παρενέβαλον εἰς τὸ πέραν ’ ἐν τῇ ἐρήμῳ, τὸ ἐξέχον ἀπὸ τῶν ὁρίων τῶν Ἀμορραίων· ἔστιν γὰρ Ἀρνῶν ὅρια Μωὰβ ἀνὰ μέσον Μωὰβ καὶ ἀνὰ μέσον τοῦ Ἀμορραίου.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Quem relinquentes castrametati sunt contra Arnon, quæ est in deserto, et prominet in finibus Amorrhæi. Siquidem Arnon terminus est Moab, dividens Moabitas et Amorrhæos.
Salieron de allí y acamparon al otro lado del río Arnón, que está en el desierto y se extiende desde la frontera de los amorreos. El Arnón es la frontera de Moab, y separa a los moabitas de los amorreos.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
De allí movieron, y asentaron de la otra parte de Arnón, que está en el desierto, y que sale del término del Amorrheo; porque Arnón es término de Moab, entre Moab y el Amorrheo.
From there they moved on and camped on the other side of the Arnon, in the wilderness that extends into the Amorite territory. Now the Arnon is the border between the Moabites and the Amorites.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse narrates the Israelites' departure from a previous location and their encampment beyond the Arnon river, describing this river's course through the wilderness up to Amorite territory. It closes with an explanatory clause identifying the Arnon as the boundary separating Moab from the Amorites.
Key words
- na.sa.'U ("they set out", H5265) — qal perfect, marking a completed action that began the itinerary notice.
- va.yaḥanu ("and they encamped", H2583) — narrative form with the vav-consecutive, linking sequentially to the previous verb ("they set out... and then encamped").
- 'ever ("side of", H5676G) — construct noun, requiring a following genitive (here Arnon) to specify "the other side of the Arnon."
- yo.tze' ("goes out/extends", H3318I) — qal participle, describing an ongoing geographic feature (the wilderness's extension) rather than a completed action.
- ki ("that/for", H3588A) — subordinating particle introducing the explanatory clause about the Arnon's role as a border.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence opens with two verbs in sequence: na.sa.'U ("they set out", perfect) followed by va.yaḥanu ("and they encamped", narrative form), a typical pairing in itinerary notices that marks departure and arrival as connected stages of movement. The location of encampment is given through the construct phrase me.'ever 'Arnon ("from the other side of Arnon"), followed by a relative clause introduced by 'a.sher ("which") that further qualifies the wilderness (ba.midbar) using the participle yo.tze' ("that goes out/extends"). The participial form presents this extension as a standing geographic characteristic rather than a single event, describing how the wilderness reaches toward the border (ge.vul, construct "border of") of the Amorites.
The final clause, introduced by ki, functions as an explanatory aside: it restates that the Arnon itself constitutes the border (ge.vul) of Moab, specifying this with the paired preposition bein... u.vein ("between... and between") linking Moab and the Amorites. This construction with repeated bein is common in Hebrew for marking a boundary between two parties.
Differences between versions
The Vulgate renders the participle yo.tze' ("goes out from") with prominet in finibus Amorrhæi ("projects into the borders of the Amorite"), using "in" (into) where the Hebrew preposition mi (H9006, "from") and the LXX's ἀπὸ ("from") indicate motion away from the Amorite border rather than into it. The LXX combines the two Hebrew verbs na.sa.'U and va.yaḥanu into a participial construction (ἀπάραντες παρενέβαλον, "having departed, they encamped"), differing stylistically from the Hebrew's sequential finite verbs but preserving the same sequence of events.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.