Numbers 19:4
וְלָקַח אֶלְעָזָר הַכֹּהֵן מִדָּמָהּ בְּאֶצְבָּעוֹ וְהִזָּה אֶל־נֹכַח פְּנֵי אֹֽהֶל־מוֹעֵד מִדָּמָהּ שֶׁבַע פְּעָמִֽים׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְלָקַ֞ח אֶלְעָזָ֧ר הַכֹּהֵ֛ן מִדָּמָ֖הּ בְּאֶצְבָּע֑וֹ וְהִזָּ֞ה אֶל־נֹ֨כַח פְּנֵ֧י אֹֽהֶל־מוֹעֵ֛ד מִדָּמָ֖הּ שֶׁ֥בַע פְּעָמִֽים׃
καὶ λήμψεται Ἐλεαζὰρ ἀπὸ τοῦ αἵματος αὐτῆς, καὶ ῥανεῖ ἀπέναντι τοῦ προσώπου τῆς σκηνῆς τοῦ μαρτυρίου ἀπὸ τοῦ αἵματος αὐτῆς ἑπτάκις.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
et tingens digitum in sanguine ejus, asperget contra fores tabernaculi septem vicibus,
Luego, el sacerdote Eleazar tomará con el dedo un poco de la sangre y la rociará siete veces hacia la parte delantera de la Tienda del Encuentro.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y tomará Eleazar el sacerdote de su sangre con su dedo, y rociará hacia la delantera del tabernáculo del testimonio con la sangre de ella siete veces;
Eleazar the priest is to take some of its blood on his finger and sprinkle it seven times toward the front of the Tent of Meeting.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse describes a ritual action: Eleazar the priest takes some of the blood (of the red heifer, referenced from the previous verse) with his finger and sprinkles it seven times toward the front of the Tent of Meeting. The verbs describe a sequence of two actions — taking and sprinkling — both performed by the priest.
Key words
- la.Kach ("he will take", H3947G) — qal sequential perfect; continues a narrative chain begun in the prior verse, marking this as the next act in the ritual sequence.
- ko.Hen ("priest", H3548) — masculine singular noun in apposition to Eleazar's name, specifying his cultic role in performing the act.
- 'etz.ba.' ("finger", H0676) — feminine singular construct noun with the suffix -o ("his"), specifying the instrument of application; the construct form ties it directly to the possessor.
- hi.Zah ("he will spatter", H5137A) — hiphil (causative) sequential perfect; the causative stem indicates the priest causes the blood to scatter, distinct from a simple placing action.
- She.va' pe.'a.Mim ("seven times", H7651 + H6471) — cardinal number plus plural noun, quantifying the repetitions of the sprinkling action.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence is built as two coordinated clauses joined by the narrative ve- ("and"), each headed by a sequential perfect verb: laqach ("he will take") and hizzah ("he will spatter"). This verbal chain marks a continuous sequence of ritual steps rather than isolated events. The object of the first verb is expressed through the partitive preposition mi- ("some of") attached to dam ("blood") with the third-feminine-singular suffix -ah ("its"), referring back to the animal's blood mentioned earlier. The phrase be-'etzba'o ("with his finger") specifies the instrument, using a construct noun with a pronominal suffix.
The second clause repeats the same partitive blood phrase (mi-damah) before the goal is stated: 'el nokhach pene 'ohel mo'ed ("to the front of the face of the tent of meeting"), a chain of construct nouns building a precise directional target. The hiphil stem of hizzah denotes causing the blood to scatter or spatter, distinguishing this action from simply touching or placing blood. The final phrase sheva pe'amim ("seven times") quantifies the repetitions of the sprinkling act.
Differences between versions
The LXX (καὶ λήμψεται Ἐλεαζὰρ ἀπὸ τοῦ αἵματος αὐτῆς) does not render the Hebrew be-'etzba'o ("with his finger") in the taking clause, nor does it repeat "the priest" (ha-kohen) as a title for Eleazar. The Vulgate places the finger action explicitly in a participial phrase, tingens digitum in sanguine ejus ("dipping his finger in her blood"), and does not name Eleazar in this verse at all, relying on the subject from the previous verse. Where the Hebrew reads nokhach pene 'ohel mo'ed ("before the face of the tent of meeting"), the Vulgate has contra fores tabernaculi ("toward the doors of the tabernacle"), using "doors" rather than "face/front."
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.