Numbers 17:8

וַיְהִי מִֽמָּחֳרָת וַיָּבֹא מֹשֶׁה אֶל־אֹהֶל הָעֵדוּת וְהִנֵּה פָּרַח מַטֵּֽה־אַהֲרֹן לְבֵית לֵוִי וַיֹּצֵֽא פֶרַח וַיָּצֵֽץ צִיץ וַיִּגְמֹל שְׁקֵדִֽים׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיְהִ֣י מִֽמָּחֳרָ֗ת וַיָּבֹ֤א מֹשֶׁה֙ אֶל־אֹ֣הֶל הָעֵד֔וּת וְהִנֵּ֛ה פָּרַ֥ח מַטֵּֽה־אַהֲרֹ֖ן לְבֵ֣ית לֵוִ֑י וַיֹּ֤צֵֽא פֶ֙רַח֙ וַיָּ֣צֵֽץ צִ֔יץ וַיִּגְמֹ֖ל שְׁקֵדִֽים׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ἐγένετο τῇ ἐπαύριον κα εἰσῆλθεν Μωυσῆς καὶ Ἀαρὼν εἰς τὴν σκηνὴν τοῦ μαρτυρίου, καὶ ἰδοὺ ἐβλάστησεν ἡ ῥάβδος Ἀαρὼν εἰς οἶκον Λευεί, καὶ ἐξήνεγκεν βλαστὸν κα ἐξήνθησεν ἄνθη καὶ ἐβλάστησεν κάρυα.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

sequenti die regressus invenit germinasse virgam Aaron in domo Levi: et turgentibus gemmis eruperant flores, qui, foliis dilatatis, in amygdalas deformati sunt.

Spanish

Al día siguiente, cuando Moisés entró en la Tienda del Testimonio, vio que la vara de Aarón, que representaba a la casa de Leví, había retoñado; tenía brotes, había florecido y producido almendras maduras.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y aconteció que el día siguiente vino Moisés al tabernáculo del testimonio; y he aquí que la vara de Aarón de la casa de Leví había brotado, y echado flores, y arrojado renuevos, y producido almendras.

English

The next day Moses entered the Tent of the Testimony and saw that Aaron’s staff, representing the house of Levi, had sprouted, put forth buds, blossomed, and produced almonds.

What the text says

Summary

The verse narrates that on the following day, Moses entered the Tent of the Testimony and found that Aaron's staff, representing the house of Levi, had sprouted, budded, blossomed, and produced ripe almonds. The Hebrew text uses four consecutive verbs to describe the stages of this botanical transformation.

Key words

  • pa.Rach ("it had budded", H6524A) — qal perfect, marking a completed state discovered upon Moses' arrival, the first stage of growth.
  • ma.teh- ("the rod of", H4294G) — masculine singular construct, linking the staff directly to 'a.ha.Ron ("Aaron", H0175) as its possessor.
  • i.Yo.tze' ("it had put forth", H3318M) — hiphil narrative, causative form indicating the staff actively produced fe.rach ("bud", H6525).
  • i.Ya.tzetz ("it had blossomed", H6692A) — hiphil narrative, causative, describing the staff bringing forth Tzitz ("blossom", H6731A).
  • i.yig.Mol ("it had ripened", H1580) — qal narrative, the final stage where the almonds reach maturity, denoted by she.ke.Dim ("almonds", H8247).

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence structure moves through a temporal marker (mi.mo.cho.Rat, "from the next day", H4283) followed by a chain of narrative verbs (va-yiqtol forms) that advance the storyline: Moses arrives (i.ya.Vo', H0935G), and then the interjection hi.Neh ("there!", H2009) introduces the discovery. After this discovery marker, the verb switches to a qal perfect (pa.Rach, H6524A) to describe the state already accomplished — the staff "had budded" — before the narrative resumes with three additional verbs in sequence describing successive stages: putting forth a bud, blossoming, and ripening into almonds.

Two of these four verbs describing the staff's transformation (i.Yo.tze' and i.Ya.tzetz) are in the hiphil stem, a causative form. This grammatical choice presents the staff as the grammatical subject actively producing the bud and blossom, rather than simply being described as blossoming passively. The final verb, i.yig.Mol (H1580), refers to the ripening or completion of fruit, here applied to the almonds reaching full maturity.

The construct chains ma.teh-'a.ha.Ron ("rod of Aaron") and Veit le.Vi ("house of Levi", H1004M + H3878) grammatically link the object (staff) to its owner and then to the tribal house it represents, without any additional verb needed — construct state alone establishes this relationship.

Differences between versions

The LXX text as given includes "Ἀαρὼν" alongside "Μωυσῆς" as one who enters the tent (καὶ εἰσῆλθεν Μωυσῆς καὶ Ἀαρὼν), while the Hebrew text names only mo.Sheh ("Moses", H4872) as the one entering. The Vulgate's regressus invenit ("returning, he found") conveys the discovery with a different verbal construction than the Hebrew's interjection hi.Neh ("there!", H2009), which functions as a vivid narrative marker rather than a verb of finding.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.