Numbers 16:19

וַיַּקְהֵל עֲלֵיהֶם קֹרַח אֶת־כָּל־הָעֵדָה אֶל־פֶּתַח אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד וַיֵּרָא כְבוֹד־יְהוָה אֶל־כָּל־הָעֵדָֽה׃ פ

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיַּקְהֵ֨ל עֲלֵיהֶ֥ם קֹ֙רַח֙ אֶת־כָּל־הָ֣עֵדָ֔ה אֶל־פֶּ֖תַח אֹ֣הֶל מוֹעֵ֑ד וַיֵּרָ֥א כְבוֹד־יְהוָ֖ה אֶל־כָּל־הָעֵדָֽה׃ פ

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ἐπισυνέστησεν ἐπ’ αὐτοὺς κόρε τὴν πᾶσαν αὐτοῦ συναγωγὴν παρὰ τὴν θύραν τῆς σκηνῆς τοῦ μαρτυρίου· καὶ ὤφθη ἡ δόξα κυρίου πάσῃ τῇ συναγωγῇ.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

et coacervassent adversum eos omnem multitudinem ad ostium tabernaculi, apparuit cunctis gloria Domini.

Spanish

Cuando Coré ya había reunido a toda la comunidad en contra de ellos a la entrada de la Tienda del Encuentro, la gloria de Yehová se le apareció a toda la asamblea.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Ya Coré había hecho juntar contra ellos toda la congregación á la puerta del tabernáculo del testimonio: entonces la gloria de Jehová apareció á toda la congregación.

English

When Korah had gathered his whole assembly against them at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting, the glory of the LORD appeared to the whole congregation.

What the text says

Summary

Numbers 16:19 narrates that Korah assembled the whole congregation against Moses and Aaron at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting, and that the glory of Yehovah then appeared to the entire congregation. The verse uses two consecutive narrative clauses joined by the vav-consecutive construction typical of Hebrew narrative sequence.

Key words

  • yaqhel ("he called together", H6950) — Hiphil (causative) form: Korah does not merely gather but actively causes the congregation to assemble.
  • 'edah ("congregation", H5712) — feminine singular noun with definite article, referring to the collective body of Israel as a unified group.
  • petach ("entrance of", H6607) — masculine singular construct, forming a chain with 'ohel mo'ed ("tent of meeting") to locate the scene precisely.
  • yera' ("it appeared", H7200) — Niphal (passive/reflexive) form: the glory "was seen" or "showed itself," the verb marking a divine self-manifestation rather than an action performed on the glory by another agent.
  • kevod ("glory of", H3519) — construct form, binding "glory" directly to Yehovah, presenting it as an attribute or manifestation belonging to the divine name.

What the text says

The verse is built as two parallel narrative clauses, each opened by the narrative va ("and then"), producing a tight sequence: first Korah's action (yaqhel), then Yehovah's response (yera'). Both verbs are third-person masculine singular, but their voices differ — the Hiphil yaqhel marks Korah as an active causer of assembly, while the Niphal yera' marks the glory as appearing without a stated human or narrative agent causing it, emphasizing its own manifestation.

The phrase kol ha'edah ("all the congregation") appears twice, framing the verse: once as the object gathered by Korah, and once as the audience before whom the glory appears. This repetition ties the two events to the same group, contrasting the human assembly Korah organizes with the divine appearance that follows. The construct chain petach 'ohel mo'ed ("entrance of the tent of meeting") anchors the action spatially at the sanctuary threshold, a location tied elsewhere in Numbers to divine judgment scenes.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders the object of Korah's gathering as πᾶσαν αὐτοῦ συναγωγὴν ("his whole assembly"), inserting a possessive αὐτοῦ ("his") not present in the Hebrew kol ha'edah ("all the congregation," with no possessive suffix). The BSB follows this reading with "his whole assembly."

The Vulgate and SBLIBRE restructure the two Hebrew coordinate clauses (joined by vav-consecutive) into a hypotactic construction, rendering the first clause as a temporal subordinate ("cum... coacervassent," "Cuando Coré ya había reunido") followed by the main clause about the glory's appearance, where the Hebrew presents both events as sequential main clauses of equal narrative weight.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.