Numbers 13:20

וּמָה הָאָרֶץ הַשְּׁמֵנָה הִוא אִם־רָזָה הֲיֵֽשׁ־בָּהּ עֵץ אִם־אַיִן וְהִתְחַזַּקְתֶּם וּלְקַחְתֶּם מִפְּרִי הָאָרֶץ וְהַיָּמִים יְמֵי בִּכּוּרֵי עֲנָבִֽים׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וּמָ֣ה הָ֠אָרֶץ הַשְּׁמֵנָ֨ה הִ֜וא אִם־רָזָ֗ה הֲיֵֽשׁ־בָּ֥הּ עֵץ֙ אִם־אַ֔יִן וְהִ֨תְחַזַּקְתֶּ֔ם וּלְקַחְתֶּ֖ם מִפְּרִ֣י הָאָ֑רֶץ וְהַ֨יָּמִ֔ים יְמֵ֖י בִּכּוּרֵ֥י עֲנָבִֽים׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ τίς ἡ γῆ εἰς ἣν οὗτοι ἐνκάθηνται ἐπ’ αὐτῆς, ἢ καλή ἐστιν ἢ πονηρά· καὶ τίνες αἱ πόλεις εἰς ἃς οὗτοι κατοικοῦσιν ἐν αὐταῖς, ἢ ἐν τειχήρεσιν ἢ ἐν ἀτειχίσταις·

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

ipsa terra, bona an mala: urbes quales, muratæ an absque muris:

Spanish

y cómo es la tierra, si es fértil o pobre, si hay madera en ella o no. Sean valientes y traigan algo del fruto de la tierra”. Era el tiempo de las primeras uvas maduras.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y cuál sea el terreno, si es pingüe ó flaco, si en él hay ó no árboles: y esforzaos, y coged del fruto del país. Y el tiempo era el tiempo de las primeras uvas.

(Num.13.21)

English

Is the soil fertile or unproductive? Are there trees in it or not? Be courageous, and bring back some of the fruit of the land.” ( It was the season for the first ripe grapes.)

What the text says

Summary

The verse poses a series of paired alternative questions about the land — whether it is fertile or poor, wooded or bare — followed by a command (expressed through sequential perfect verbs) to act boldly and bring back fruit. It closes with a parenthetical note fixing the season as that of the first ripe grapes.

Key words

  • mah ("what?", H4100) — opens the question about the nature of the land, paired with the article-marked adjective that follows.
  • shemenah ("fat", H8082) — feminine adjective describing 'aretz ("land", H0776G), the first term of a binary alternative with razah ("lean", H7330).
  • 'im ("or", H0518A) — used twice, each time linking two opposite terms in a "is it X or Y?" question pattern, not its more common conditional sense "if."
  • hitchazaktem ("you will show yourselves strong", H2388G) — hithpael (reflexive) sequential perfect; grammatically continues the narrative chain but functions with directive force after the string of questions.
  • yemei bikkurei 'anavim ("days of firstfruits of grapes", H3117G/H1061/H6025) — a chain of construct nouns forming a compact temporal label for the season.

What the text says

The Hebrew presents two parallel interrogative pairs built on the same pattern: an interrogative particle (ha, H9008) attached to an adjective or noun, followed by 'im ("or") introducing the opposite term. First: "is the land fat (shemenah) or ('im) lean (razah)?" Second: "is there (yesh, H3426) in it wood/trees ('etz, H6086H) or ('im) not ('ayin, H0369)?" This double alternative structure packs two full yes/no questions into a tight syntactic frame not easily reproduced in translation, since English or Spanish must spell out "is it A or is it B" where Hebrew reuses the same particles economically.

After the questions, the vav-prefixed sequential perfects hitchazaktem and u-leqachtem ("and you will take", H3947J) continue the verbal chain begun implicitly by the preceding imperatives in the wider passage; sequential perfect forms following commands commonly carry directive force in Biblical Hebrew narrative syntax, so the shift from interrogative to sequential-perfect is a grammatical device linking inquiry to instruction without a new imperative form.

The final clause, ve-hayyamim yemei bikkurei 'anavim ("and the days were the days of the firstfruits of grapes"), is a nominal (verbless) clause — a parenthetical time-marker inserted into the narrative, identified by construct-chain nouns rather than a finite verb.

Differences between versions

The LXX and Vulgate for this verse include material about cities and walls (πόλεις, τειχήρεσιν; urbes, muratae) that does not appear among the Hebrew words listed for verse 20, which concern only the land's fertility and wood. This indicates a difference in verse content/division between the Hebrew textual unit given and the Greek/Latin renderings at this point, rather than a translation choice within the same wording.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.