Numbers 12:10
וְהֶעָנָן סָר מֵעַל הָאֹהֶל וְהִנֵּה מִרְיָם מְצֹרַעַת כַּשָּׁלֶג וַיִּפֶן אַהֲרֹן אֶל־מִרְיָם וְהִנֵּה מְצֹרָֽעַת׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְהֶעָנָ֗ן סָ֚ר מֵעַ֣ל הָאֹ֔הֶל וְהִנֵּ֥ה מִרְיָ֖ם מְצֹרַ֣עַת כַּשָּׁ֑לֶג וַיִּ֧פֶן אַהֲרֹ֛ן אֶל־מִרְיָ֖ם וְהִנֵּ֥ה מְצֹרָֽעַת׃
καὶ ἡ νεφέλη ἀπέστη ἀπὸ τῆς σκηνῆς, καὶ ἰδοὺ Μαριὰμ λεπρῶσα ὡσεὶ χιών. καὶ ἐπέβλεψεν Ἀαρὼν ἐπὶ Μαριάμ, καὶ ἰδοὺ λεπρῶσα.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
nubes quoque recessit quæ erat super tabernaculum: et ecce Maria apparuit candens lepra quasi nix. Cumque respexisset eam Aaron, et vidisset perfusam lepra,
Cuando la nube se alejó de la Tienda, resultó que Miriam tenía lepra, y su piel estaba blanca como la nieve. Al volverse Aarón hacia Miriam, vio que estaba leprosa.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y la nube se apartó del tabernáculo: y he aquí que María era leprosa como la nieve; y miró Aarón á María, y he aquí que estaba leprosa.
As the cloud lifted from above the Tent, suddenly Miriam became leprous, white as snow. Aaron turned toward her, saw that she was leprous,
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse describes the cloud lifting from over the tent, followed by the sudden discovery that Miriam had become leprous, white as snow. Aaron turns toward her and confirms the same condition. The Hebrew marks both discoveries with the same exclamatory structure, creating a doubled emphasis on the visual shock of what is seen.
Key words
- sar ("it departed", H5493G) — qal perfect, 3rd person, agreeing with the masculine noun anan ("cloud"); marks the cloud's withdrawal as a completed, prior event that sets the scene.
- hinneh ("there!", H2009) — an interjection used twice in this verse, functioning like a narrative spotlight that shifts attention abruptly to what is suddenly visible (first the leprosy, then its confirmation by Aaron).
- metzora'at ("leprous", H6879) — pual passive participle, feminine singular, appearing twice with identical form; as a passive participle it describes Miriam as one acted upon by the condition rather than as an agent, and its repetition ties the two hinneh clauses together.
- vayifen ("and he turned", H6437G) — qal verb with narrative vav, moving the story forward in sequence: Aaron's turning is the next event after the cloud's departure and the initial sighting.
- ke-shaleg ("like the snow", H7950 with H9004) — the comparative preposition attached to "snow" specifies the visual quality (whiteness) of the leprous skin, not its intensity or type.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence is built as a chain of short clauses linked by ve- ("and") and the narrative vav on vayifen, producing a paratactic sequence typical of Biblical Hebrew narrative: first the cloud's departure (sar), then the discovery introduced by hinneh, then Aaron's action (vayifen), then a second discovery again introduced by hinneh. This repetition of hinneh + metzora'at is a structural mirroring: the narrator's own report of what is seen (first hinneh) is echoed by Aaron's perception of the same fact (second hinneh), without any additional verb of seeing in the Hebrew for the second instance — the bare hinneh stands in for "and behold" needing no verb "to see."
The word metzora'at is grammatically a passive participle, describing Miriam's state as something that has happened to her, consistent with the pual (intensive passive) stem's function of marking a resulting condition. The comparison ka-shaleg ("like the snow") modifies only the participle's descriptive quality (whiteness), governed by the preposition ke- ("like").
Differences between versions
The Vulgate expands the second hinneh clause into a subordinate construction — "cumque respexisset eam Aaron, et vidisset perfusam lepra" ("when Aaron had looked at her and seen her covered with leprosy") — introducing an explicit verb of seeing ("vidisset") not present in the Hebrew's bare hinneh. The Vulgate also adds "apparuit candens lepra" ("appeared shining with leprosy") for the first instance, an interpretive expansion beyond the Hebrew's simple hinneh mirNyam metzora'at. The LXX renders metzora'at both times as the adjective λεπρῶσα ("leprous"), a more literal parallel to the Hebrew's repeated participle than the Vulgate's varied phrasing.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.