Numbers 11:21

וַיֹּאמֶר מֹשֶׁה שֵׁשׁ־מֵאוֹת אֶלֶף רַגְלִי הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אָנֹכִי בְּקִרְבּוֹ וְאַתָּה אָמַרְתָּ בָּשָׂר אֶתֵּן לָהֶם וְאָכְלוּ חֹדֶשׁ יָמִֽים׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיֹּאמֶר֮ מֹשֶׁה֒ שֵׁשׁ־מֵא֥וֹת אֶ֙לֶף֙ רַגְלִ֔י הָעָ֕ם אֲשֶׁ֥ר אָנֹכִ֖י בְּקִרְבּ֑וֹ וְאַתָּ֣ה אָמַ֗רְתָּ בָּשָׂר֙ אֶתֵּ֣ן לָהֶ֔ם וְאָכְל֖וּ חֹ֥דֶשׁ יָמִֽים׃

Greek (Septuagint)

Καὶ εἶπεν μωυσῆς πρὸς Κύριον Ἑξακόσιαι χιλιάδες πεζῶν ὁ λαὸς ἐν οἷς εἰμὶ ἐν αὐτοῖς, καὶ σὺ εἲπας κρέα δώσω αὐτοῖς φαγεῖν, καὶ φάγονται μῆνα ἡμερῶν·

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Et ait Moyses: Sexcenta millia peditum hujus populi sunt: et tu dicis: Dabo eis esum carnium mense integro?

Spanish

Moisés respondió: “El pueblo en el que me encuentro tiene seiscientos mil hombres de a pie, ¡y tú dices: ‘Les daré carne para que coman durante un mes entero’!

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Entonces dijo Moisés: Seiscientos mil de á pie es el pueblo en medio del cual yo estoy; y tú dices: Les daré carne, y comerán el tiempo de un mes.

English

But Moses replied, “Here I am among 600,000 men on foot, yet You say, ‘ I will give them meat, and they will eat for a month.’

What the text says

Summary

Moses responds to YHWH's promise of meat by pointing out the size of the people among whom he lives: six hundred thousand foot soldiers. He then repeats back the divine promise — meat given "to them" so they may eat for a full month — as an implicit objection to its feasibility.

Key words

  • shesh ("six", H8337) — construct-state cardinal number opening a numeral chain with me'ot ("hundreds") and 'elef ("thousand"), together forming "six hundred thousand."
  • ragli ("foot soldier", H7273) — an adjective modifying the counted people, specifying they are infantry, i.e., adult males counted for military/census purposes.
  • qirb + o ("midst" + "his/its", H7130G + H9023) — construct noun with pronominal suffix, literally "in the midst of it," expressing Moses' physical immersion among the people.
  • 'atah ("you", H0859A) — independent personal pronoun placed before the verb 'amarta ("you have said," H0559), creating emphatic contrast between Moses' situation and YHWH's statement.
  • 'etten ("I will give", H5414G) — qal imperfect first-person, expressing YHWH's future/ongoing action as quoted by Moses.

What the text says

The verse opens with the narrative va-yomer ("and he said," H0559) introducing Moses' speech. The core numerical statement — shesh-me'ot 'elef ragli — is a construct chain: "six" governs "hundreds," which governs "thousand," which is further specified by the adjective ragli ("foot [soldiers]"). This chain produces the number 600,000 as a description of ha'am ("the people," H5971A), qualified by the relative clause asher anokhi beqirbo ("which I am in its midst") — Moses situates himself spatially and existentially within this vast population before questioning the plan.

The second half shifts to direct address: the conjunction ve- ("and") plus the emphatic pronoun 'atah ("you") precedes 'amarta ("you have said"), a qal perfect marking completed speech — Moses quotes back what has already been stated. The quoted promise itself, basar 'etten lahem ("meat I will give to them"), fronts the object basar ("meat") before the verb 'etten, giving it prominence. The sequential perfect ve-akhlu ("and they will eat," H0398) continues the temporal sequence begun by 'etten, and the closing construct chodesh yamim ("month of days," H2320G + H3117G) specifies duration — literally "a month of days," an idiom for a full lunar month.

Differences between versions

The LXX adds πρὸς Κύριον ("to the Lord"), explicitly naming the addressee of Moses' speech, an element not present in the Hebrew text, which leaves the addressee implicit through context. The Vulgate renders the final clause as a question — "Dabo eis esum carnium mense integro?" ("Will I give them meat to eat for a whole month?") — introducing an interrogative force absent from the Hebrew, which presents Moses' words as a direct quotation of a statement rather than a question.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.