Leviticus 6:12
וְהָאֵשׁ עַל־הַמִּזְבֵּחַ תּֽוּקַד־בּוֹ לֹא תִכְבֶּה וּבִעֵר עָלֶיהָ הַכֹּהֵן עֵצִים בַּבֹּקֶר בַּבֹּקֶר וְעָרַךְ עָלֶיהָ הָֽעֹלָה וְהִקְטִיר עָלֶיהָ חֶלְבֵי הַשְּׁלָמִֽים׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְהָאֵ֨שׁ עַל־הַמִּזְבֵּ֤חַ תּֽוּקַד־בּוֹ֙ לֹ֣א תִכְבֶּ֔ה וּבִעֵ֨ר עָלֶ֧יהָ הַכֹּהֵ֛ן עֵצִ֖ים בַּבֹּ֣קֶר בַּבֹּ֑קֶר וְעָרַ֤ךְ עָלֶ֙יהָ֙ הָֽעֹלָ֔ה וְהִקְטִ֥יר עָלֶ֖יהָ חֶלְבֵ֥י הַשְּׁלָמִֽים׃
καὶ πῦρ ἐπὶ τὸ θυσιαστήριον καυθήσεται ἀπ᾽ αὐτοῦ, καὶ οὐ σβεσθήσεται· καὶ καύσει ὁ ἱερεὺς ἐπ᾽ αὐτὸ ξύλα τὸ πρωὶ, καὶ στοιβάσει ἐπ᾽ αὐτοῦ τὴν ὁλοκαύτωσιν καὶ ἐπιθήσει ἐπ᾽ αὐτὸ τὸ στέαρ τοῦ σωτηρίου.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Ignis autem in altari semper ardebit, quem nutriet sacerdos subjiciens ligna mane per singulos dies, et imposito holocausto, desuper adolebit adipes pacificorum.
El fuego del altar debe mantenerse encendido; no se debe apagar. Cada mañana el sacerdote le pondrá más leña, acomodará el holocausto encima y quemará ahí la grasa de los sacrificios de paz.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y el fuego encendido sobre el altar no ha de apagarse, sino que el sacerdote pondrá en él leña cada mañana, y acomodará sobre él el holocausto, y quemará sobre él los sebos de las paces.
The fire on the altar shall be kept burning; it must not be extinguished. Every morning the priest is to add wood to the fire, arrange the burnt offering on it, and burn the fat portions of the peace offerings on it.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse commands that the fire on the altar must keep burning continuously and never be extinguished. Each morning the priest must add wood to it, arrange the burnt offering on it, and burn the fat portions of the peace offerings on it.
Key words
- tukad ("it will burn", H3344) — hophal (causative-passive) imperfect: the fire "is kept burning" by an external agent, not simply burning on its own.
- tikhbeh ("it will be extinguished", H3518) — qal imperfect with the negation lo' ("not", H3808): a straightforward prohibition against the fire going out.
- vi'er ("he will kindle", H1197A) — piel (intensive) sequential perfect: an intensive verb form describing the priest's repeated, deliberate act of feeding the fire.
- baboker baboker ("in the morning, in the morning", H1242 doubled) — the repetition of the noun expresses distributive recurrence, i.e., "every single morning."
- hiqtir ("he will make smoke", H6999A) — hiphil (causative) sequential perfect: the priest causes the fat to go up in smoke, distinct from ordinary burning.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence opens with ha'esh ("the fire", H0784) as subject, followed by the hophal verb tukad ("it will burn", H3344): the causative-passive form indicates the fire is maintained by an agent (the priest) rather than burning autonomously. This is immediately reinforced by the negative clause lo' tikhbeh ("it will not be extinguished", H3518), a qal imperfect stating the prohibition directly.
The rest of the verse is a chain of sequential perfects (vi'er, 'arakh, hiqtir) linked by the narrative vav (H9001), describing the priest's ordered actions: kindling wood with the piel verb vi'er ("he will kindle", H1197A), arranging the burnt offering with the qal verb 'arakh ("he will arrange", H6186A), and finally causing the fat of the peace offerings to smoke with the hiphil verb hiqtir ("he will make smoke", H6999A). The doubling baboker baboker ("in the morning, in the morning", H1242) is a Hebrew distributive construction, conveying repetition on each individual morning rather than a single occurrence. Each verb in the chain uses a distinct binyan (stem), marking different levels of agency: passive-causative for the fire, intensive for kindling, simple for arranging, and causative for the smoke-offering action.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders baboker baboker ("in the morning, in the morning", H1242) with a single τὸ πρωὶ ("in the morning"), not reproducing the Hebrew's doubled distributive form. The Vulgate expresses this repetition differently, using per singulos dies ("through each day"), which shifts the emphasis from "every morning" to "every day."
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.