Leviticus 27:30

וְכָל־מַעְשַׂר הָאָרֶץ מִזֶּרַע הָאָרֶץ מִפְּרִי הָעֵץ לַיהוָה הוּא קֹדֶשׁ לַֽיהוָֽה׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְכָל־מַעְשַׂ֨ר הָאָ֜רֶץ מִזֶּ֤רַע הָאָ֙רֶץ֙ מִפְּרִ֣י הָעֵ֔ץ לַיהוָ֖ה ה֑וּא קֹ֖דֶשׁ לַֽיהוָֽה׃

Greek (Septuagint)

Πᾶσα δεκάτη τῆς γῆς, ἀπὸ τοῦ σπέρματος τῆς γῆς καὶ τοῦ καρποῦ τοῦ ξυλίνου, τῷ κυρίῳ ἐστίν· ἅγιον τῷ κυρίῳ.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Omnes decimæ terræ, sive de frugibus, sive de pomis arborum, Domini sunt, et illi sanctificantur.

Spanish

“‘La décima parte de todos los productos de la tierra, ya sean cereales o frutas, le pertenece a Yehová y es algo consagrado a él.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y todas las décimas de la tierra, así de la simiente de la tierra como del fruto de los árboles, de Jehová son: es cosa consagrada á Jehová.

English

Thus any tithe from the land, whether from the seed of the land or the fruit of the trees, belongs to the LORD; it is holy to the LORD.

What the text says

Summary

Leviticus 27:30 states that every tithe of the land — whether from the seed of the land or from the fruit of the trees — belongs to Yehovah (H3068G), and is designated as qodesh ("a holy thing", H6944G) to him.

Key words

ma'sar ("tithe of", H4643) — construct form meaning "the tithe of," grammatically bound to ha'aretz ("the land"), establishing that the tithe in view is specifically agricultural produce of the land.

zera' ("seed of", H2233G) — construct noun linking to ha'aretz a second time, forming a pair with peri below; this construct chain specifies the two categories of tithe-able produce.

peri ("fruit of", H6529) — construct noun paired with ha'etz ("the tree[s]", H6086H), completing the merism "seed...fruit" that spans field crops and orchard produce.

hu' ("it", H1931) — third-person personal pronoun functioning as a copula between the subject (the tithe) and the prepositional phrase la-Yehovah ("to/for Yehovah"), asserting the tithe's belonging.

qodesh ("a holy thing", H6944G) — a noun in apposition, restating the tithe's status after the pronoun hu' has already declared its belonging, reinforcing the designation with a second predicate.

What the text says

The verse opens with ve-khol-ma'sar ha'aretz ("and all the tithe of the land"), using the construct chain ma'sar...ha'aretz to define the tithe as one drawn from the land's produce. This is then specified through two parallel prepositional phrases introduced by mi ("from", H9006): mi-zera' ha'aretz ("from the seed of the land") and mi-peri ha'etz ("from the fruit of the tree[s]"). Both phrases share the same construct-plus-preposition structure, creating a balanced pairing that covers field crops (zera') and tree produce (peri) as the two components of "the land's" yield.

The sentence contains two predications about this tithe, each introduced by the preposition la ("to/for", H9005) governing Yehovah. First, the pronoun hu' ("it") links the subject to la-Yehovah, stating that the tithe "is Yehovah's" — a construction using a pronoun as copula rather than a verb "to be," which is characteristic of Hebrew nominal clauses. Second, the noun qodesh ("a holy thing") stands in apposition, followed again by la-Yehovah, forming a near-repetition: the tithe belongs to Yehovah, and additionally it is qodesh to Yehovah. This doubling — belonging stated once via pronoun, then reinforced via a status-noun — is a feature of the Hebrew syntax not preserved as a doubled structure in translations that render both clauses as a single flowing sentence.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders zera' ("seed") and peri ha'etz ("fruit of the tree") using genitive nouns (σπέρματος, καρποῦ τοῦ ξυλίνου) without a repeated preposition matching the Hebrew's twofold mi, and merges the two occurrences of la-Yehovah into a single κυρίῳ construction shared across both clauses, whereas the Hebrew repeats la-Yehovah twice (once with hu', once with qodesh). The Vulgate similarly consolidates the structure into "Domini sunt, et illi sanctificantur," using a passive verb ("sanctificantur," "are sanctified") for the second clause instead of the Hebrew's simple nominal predication with qodesh.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.