Leviticus 27:2
דַּבֵּר אֶל־בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְאָמַרְתָּ אֲלֵהֶם אִישׁ כִּי יַפְלִא נֶדֶר בְּעֶרְכְּךָ נְפָשֹׁת לַֽיהוָֽה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
דַּבֵּ֞ר אֶל־בְּנֵ֤י יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ וְאָמַרְתָּ֣ אֲלֵהֶ֔ם אִ֕ישׁ כִּ֥י יַפְלִ֖א נֶ֑דֶר בְּעֶרְכְּךָ֥ נְפָשֹׁ֖ת לַֽיהוָֽה׃
Λάλησον τοῖς υἱοῖς Ἰσραὴλ καὶ ἐρεῖς αὐτοῖς ὃς ἂν εὔξηται εὐχὴν ὥστε τιμὴν τῆς αὐτοῦ τῷ κυρίῳ,
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Loquere filiis Israël, et dices ad eos: Homo qui votum fecerit, et spoponderit Deo animam suam, sub æstimatione dabit pretium.
“Háblales a los israelitas y diles: ‘Cuando alguien haga una promesa especial para dedicar a una persona a Yehová, el valor de la persona se calculará de la siguiente manera:
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Habla á los hijos de Israel, y diles: Cuando alguno hiciere especial voto á Jehová, según la estimación de las personas que se hayan de redimir, así será tu estimación:
“ Speak to the Israelites and say to them, ‘ When someone makes a special vow to the LORD involving the value of persons,
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse opens a legal instruction: Yehovah commands Moses to speak to the Israelites about the case of a person who makes an extraordinary vow, framed in terms of "your valuation" of persons dedicated to Yehovah. Grammatically the sentence is unfinished — it introduces a casuistic legal formula whose resolution continues in the following verses.
Key words
- daBer ("speak", H1696) — piel imperative, the intensive command form opening the divine instruction to Moses.
- yafLi' ("he will make hard/extraordinary", H6381) — hiphil imperfect of the root pala'; the causative stem turns "being extraordinary" into "making [a vow] extraordinary," describing a vow of unusual or difficult character.
- Neder ("a vow", H5088) — masculine singular noun, the direct object of yafli', naming the legal object under discussion.
- 'erKekha ("your valuation of", H6187) — construct noun with 2ms suffix; grammatically it is "the valuation-of-you," i.e., a valuation assigned by the addressee (typically understood as the priest/appraiser in this legal context).
- nefaShot ("persons", H5315) — feminine plural noun in construct with 'erkekha, indicating that the valuation concerns human beings as its category, plural and unspecified until later verses narrow it down.
What the text says
The verse follows the standard casuistic legal pattern found elsewhere in Leviticus: an imperative (daBer) followed by a vav-sequential perfect ('amarTa, "and you will say"), which together form the narrative command chain introducing direct speech. The case itself begins with 'ish ki ("a man, if…"), a conditional construction typical of legal codes, followed by the hiphil verb yafli' governing the object neder. The hiphil stem of pala' does not simply mean "to vow" but "to make extraordinary/difficult," suggesting the vow described is of an unusual or heightened kind, distinct from an ordinary vow.
The phrase be-'erkekha nefashot is syntactically dense: 'erek ("valuation") is in construct with the 2ms suffix -kha ("your"), then linked to the plural noun nefashot ("persons"). This produces a phrase best read as "according to your valuation of persons," where the addressee (grammatically "you") is the one performing the appraisal. The plural nefashot leaves open, at this point in the text, how many or what kind of persons are meant — the specifics (age, sex, valuation amounts) are supplied only in the verses that follow. The clause ends with la-Yehovah ("to/for Yehovah"), marking the vow's ultimate recipient.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the conditional clause as hos an eúxētai euchēn ("whoever vows a vow"), omitting an explicit equivalent for nefashot ("persons") and instead using timēn tēs autou ("value of his own"), collapsing the Hebrew's plural "persons" into a more generic singular reference. The Vulgate similarly narrows nefashot to a singular animam suam ("his own soul/life"), where the Hebrew has the plural nefashot. Both LXX and Vulgate therefore present the valuation as pertaining to a single soul/life rather than to "persons" in the plural as the Hebrew construct phrase indicates.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.