Leviticus 27:11

וְאִם כָּל־בְּהֵמָה טְמֵאָה אֲשֶׁר לֹא־יַקְרִיבוּ מִמֶּנָּה קָרְבָּן לַֽיהוָה וְהֶֽעֱמִיד אֶת־הַבְּהֵמָה לִפְנֵי הַכֹּהֵֽן׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְאִם֙ כָּל־בְּהֵמָ֣ה טְמֵאָ֔ה אֲ֠שֶׁר לֹא־יַקְרִ֧יבוּ מִמֶּ֛נָּה קָרְבָּ֖ן לַֽיהוָ֑ה וְהֶֽעֱמִ֥יד אֶת־הַבְּהֵמָ֖ה לִפְנֵ֥י הַכֹּהֵֽן׃

Greek (Septuagint)

ἐὰν δὲ πᾶν κτῆνος , ἀφ’ ὧν οὐ προσφέρεται ἀπ’ αὐτῶν δῶρον τῷ κυρίῳ, στήσει τὸ κτῆνος ἔναντι τοῦ ἱερέως·

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Animal immundum, quod immolari Domino non potest, si quis voverit, adducetur ante sacerdotem:

Spanish

Si se trata de un animal impuro de los que no se pueden ofrecer a Yehová, el dueño deberá llevarlo ante el sacerdote,

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y si fuere algún animal inmundo, de que no se ofrece ofrenda á Jehová, entonces el animal será puesto delante del sacerdote:

English

But if the vow involves any of the unclean animals that may not be brought as an offering to the LORD, the animal must be presented before the priest.

What the text says

Summary

Leviticus 27:11 addresses the case of a ritually unclean animal that cannot be brought as a sacrificial offering to Yehovah. The verse states that the owner must instead present the animal before the priest, presumably for a valuation process related to a vow.

Key words

  • behemah ("animal", H0929) — feminine singular noun, referring to a domesticated animal; it appears twice in the verse, first as the general subject, then with the definite article specifying "the animal" already mentioned.
  • teme'ah ("unclean", H2931) — feminine singular adjective agreeing with behemah, marking the animal as ritually unsuitable for sacrifice.
  • yaqrivu ("people will present", H7126H) — hiphil (causative) imperfect, third person plural; the imperfect aspect indicates an ongoing or generalized action — describing what is not normally/habitually done with such an animal, rather than a single event.
  • he'emid ("he will station", H5975G) — hiphil sequential perfect, third person singular; this causative form shifts to a specific singular subject (the owner) and continues the narrative sequence begun with the conditional clause, marking the required action that follows from the animal's unclean status.
  • qorban ("a present", H7133A) — masculine singular noun, the technical term for an offering brought near to the deity; its absence in the negated clause defines what is impossible with this class of animal.

What the text says

The verse opens with the conditional particle 'im ("if", H0518A) governing the entire clause about an unclean animal, followed by a relative clause introduced by 'asher ("which", H0834A) that explains why: people do not/cannot present (yaqrivu) a qorban ("offering") from it la-Yehovah ("to Yehovah"). The shift from the plural imperfect yaqrivu (a general, customary negation — "people do not offer") to the singular sequential perfect he'emid ("he will station") marks a grammatical transition from a general statement about unclean animals to a specific required action by an individual (the owner or dedicator). The verb he'emid, causative of "to stand," implies not merely bringing the animal but causing it to stand or be positioned lifney ha-kohen ("before the priest", using the construct noun peney, H6440G), for inspection or evaluation. The direct object marker 'et before ha-behemah signals that this is the very animal earlier introduced, now made grammatically definite.

Differences between versions

The Vulgate adds the clause "si quis voverit" ("if anyone has vowed"), a phrase with no equivalent in the Hebrew text's wording of this verse, making explicit a vow context that the Hebrew leaves implicit within the broader chapter. The Vulgate also renders he'emid as "adducetur" ("it will be led/brought"), a passive construction, whereas the Hebrew and the LXX (στήσει, "he will station") preserve an active causative sense with the owner as implied agent.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.