Leviticus 26:44

וְאַף־גַּם־זֹאת בִּֽהְיוֹתָם בְּאֶרֶץ אֹֽיְבֵיהֶם לֹֽא־מְאַסְתִּים וְלֹֽא־גְעַלְתִּים לְכַלֹּתָם לְהָפֵר בְּרִיתִי אִתָּם כִּי אֲנִי יְהוָה אֱלֹהֵיהֶֽם׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְאַף־גַּם־זֹ֠את בִּֽהְיוֹתָ֞ם בְּאֶ֣רֶץ אֹֽיְבֵיהֶ֗ם לֹֽא־מְאַסְתִּ֤ים וְלֹֽא־גְעַלְתִּים֙ לְכַלֹּתָ֔ם לְהָפֵ֥ר בְּרִיתִ֖י אִתָּ֑ם כִּ֛י אֲנִ֥י יְהוָ֖ה אֱלֹהֵיהֶֽם׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ οὐδ’ ὣς ὄντων αὐτῶν ἐν τῆ γῆ τῶν ἐχθρῶν αὐτῶν οὐχ ὑπερεῖδον αὐτούς, οὐδὲ προσώχθισα αὐτοῖς ὥστε ἐξαναλῶσαι αὐτούς, τοῦ διασκεδάσαι τὴν διαθήκην μου τὴν πρὸς αὐτούς· ὅτι ἐγώ εἰμι κύριος ὁ θεὸς αὐτῶν.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Et tamen etiam cum essent in terra hostili, non penitus abjeci eos, neque sic despexi ut consumerentur, et irritum facerent pactum meum cum eis. Ego enim sum Dominus Deus eorum,

Spanish

A pesar de todo, mientras estén en el país de sus enemigos, no los rechazaré por completo ni los destruiré, porque eso anularía mi pacto con ellos. Yo soy Yehová, su Dios.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y aun con todo esto, estando ellos en tierra de sus enemigos, yo no los desecharé, ni los abominaré para consumirlos, invalidando mi pacto con ellos: porque yo Jehová soy su Dios:

English

Yet in spite of this, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not reject or despise them so as to destroy them and break My covenant with them; for I am the LORD their God.

What the text says

Summary

The verse declares that even while the people are in the land of their enemies, God has not rejected or abhorred them to the point of total destruction or annulment of the covenant. It closes with a self-identification formula, "I am Yehovah their God."

Key words

  • 'af ("also", H0637) + gam ("also", H1571) — two emphatic particles stacked together before zot ("this", H2063), producing a triple emphasis roughly "and even also this," intensifying the contrast with what precedes.
  • bi-heyotam ("in their being", H1961) — a qal infinitive construct with prefixed preposition and pronominal suffix, forming a temporal clause: "while/when they are."
  • me'asti ("I have rejected", H3988A) — qal perfect, 1st person singular, with negation lo': a completed-aspect verb describing the state of not-rejecting.
  • ge'alti ("I have abhorred", H1602) — qal perfect, 1st person singular, parallel in form and negation to me'asti, using a different root for revulsion/abhorrence.
  • le-khalotam ("to make an end of them", H3615H) and le-hafer ("to break", H6565A) — piel and hiphil infinitives construct, both introduced by le-, expressing purpose/result: the outcome that the negated verbs prevent.

What the text says

The sentence opens with the triple particle cluster ve-'af-gam-zot, which piles emphasis onto the following clause before any verb appears — a construction that foregrounds contrast with the surrounding context (destruction, exile) rather than stating a new action. The temporal infinitive bi-heyotam ("in their being") sets the scene: "in the land of their enemies." The core statement uses two parallel qal perfect verbs, me'asti and ge'alti, both negated by lo', describing what has not happened despite the circumstance just introduced. These are followed by two purpose infinitives, le-khalotam ("to make an end of them") and le-hafer... beriti ("to break my covenant"), which specify the consequence that the negated verbs are said not to produce. The verse ends with the formula ki 'ani Yehovah 'elohei-hem ("for I [am] Yehovah their God"), a nominal clause without a copula in Hebrew, functioning as grounds for the preceding statement.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders me'asti ("I have rejected") as ὑπερεῖδον ("I overlooked/disregarded") and ge'alti ("I have abhorred") as προσώχθισα ("I was vexed/angry"), shifting the semantic field from rejection/revulsion to disregard/irritation. The Vulgate adds penitus ("utterly") to "abjeci," a qualifier not present in the Hebrew text, and restructures the final purpose clause as a subjunctive result ("ut... irritum facerent pactum meum" — "so that they would render my covenant void"), which shifts the grammatical subject of the covenant-breaking action away from the divine speaker as found in the Hebrew le-hafer beriti ("to break my covenant").

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.