Leviticus 26:27
וְאִם־בְּזֹאת לֹא תִשְׁמְעוּ לִי וַהֲלַכְתֶּם עִמִּי בְּקֶֽרִי׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְאִ֨ם־בְּזֹ֔את לֹ֥א תִשְׁמְע֖וּ לִ֑י וַהֲלַכְתֶּ֥ם עִמִּ֖י בְּקֶֽרִי׃
᾿Εὰν δὲ ἐπὶ τούτοις μὴ ὑπακούσητέ μου καὶ πορεύησθε πρὸς μὲ πλάγιοι,
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Sin autem nec per hæc audieritis me, sed ambulaveritis contra me:
“‘Si a pesar de todo esto todavía no me escuchan, sino que siguen rebelándose,
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y si con esto no me oyereis, mas procediereis conmigo en oposición,
But if in spite of all this you do not obey Me, but continue to walk in hostility toward Me,
✦ What the text says
Summary
Leviticus 26:27 states a conditional clause: if, despite everything before ("in this"), the people still do not listen to God, they will continue walking with him be-qeri ("in contrariness/hostility", H7147). The verse marks an escalation in a sequence of conditional warnings within the chapter.
Key words
- 'Im ("if", H0518A) — conditional particle introducing the protasis; combined with be-zot ("in this", H2063) it points back to prior warnings already given, so the condition is cumulative ("if even after this...").
- tish.me.'U ("you will listen", H8085G) — qal imperfect, 2nd person masculine plural; the imperfect aspect marks the verb as referring to an ongoing or future failure to listen, not a single completed act.
- ha.lakh.Tem ("you will walk", H1980I) — qal sequential (waw-consecutive) perfect, 2nd person masculine plural; this form continues the narrative sequence begun by the imperfect tishme'u, presenting the "walking" as the direct consequence that follows from the failure to listen.
- Ke.ri ("contrariness", H7147) — masculine singular noun, functioning adverbially with the preposition be ("in"); it describes the manner of the "walking" — walking "in" a state of opposition rather than through a separate verb of rebelling.
What the text says
The verse is built as a conditional sentence with two main verbal actions joined by the narrative vav. The protasis opens with ve-'im-be-zot ("and if in this"), where zot ("this", H2063) refers deictically to the preceding material in the chapter, making the condition explicitly cumulative rather than a fresh, isolated hypothesis. The negated imperfect lo tishme'u li ("you will not listen to me") expresses the core failure — an unfulfilled or continuing lack of obedience toward the divine voice (li, "to me", formed by preposition + 1st person suffix).
The apodosis-like continuation uses the sequential perfect ha.lakh.Tem ("you will walk"), a grammatical form that in Biblical Hebrew narrative typically continues the temporal or logical sequence of a preceding imperfect. Here it links the "not listening" directly to "walking with me be-qeri." The phrase be-qeri uses the noun H7147 governed by the preposition be ("in"), so the grammar frames the walking itself as occurring "in" a condition of contrariness — the noun functions as a manner-adverbial rather than as an independent predicate of rebellion.
Differences between versions
The Hebrew noun qeri (H7147) is rendered differently across versions: the LXX uses the adjective πλάγιοι ("crooked/oblique," modifying an implied "you"), the Vulgate uses the prepositional phrase "contra me" ("against me"), and the BSB translates it as "in hostility toward Me." Each version captures a different nuance of the abstract Hebrew noun — LXX treating it as a description of character/path, Vulgate and BSB treating it as an oppositional relation — but none directly reproduces the Hebrew's use of a noun of manner governed by be.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.