Leviticus 24:11
וַיִּקֹּב בֶּן־הָֽאִשָּׁה הַיִּשְׂרְאֵלִית אֶת־הַשֵּׁם וַיְקַלֵּל וַיָּבִיאוּ אֹתוֹ אֶל־מֹשֶׁה וְשֵׁם אִמּוֹ שְׁלֹמִית בַּת־דִּבְרִי לְמַטֵּה־דָֽן׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַ֠יִּקֹּב בֶּן־הָֽאִשָּׁ֨ה הַיִּשְׂרְאֵלִ֤ית אֶת־הַשֵּׁם֙ וַיְקַלֵּ֔ל וַיָּבִ֥יאוּ אֹת֖וֹ אֶל־מֹשֶׁ֑ה וְשֵׁ֥ם אִמּ֛וֹ שְׁלֹמִ֥ית בַּת־דִּבְרִ֖י לְמַטֵּה־דָֽן׃
καὶ ἐπονομάσας μάσας ὁ υἱὸς τῆς γυναικὸς τῆς Ἰσραηλείτιδος τὸ ὄνομα κατηράσατο. καὶ ἤγαγον αὐτοὺς πρὸς Μωυσῆν· καὶ τὸ ὄνομα τῆς μητρὸς αὐτοῦ θ θυγάτηρ Δαβρεὶ ἐκ τῆς φυλῆς Δάν.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Cumque blasphemasset nomen, et maledixisset ei, adductus est ad Moysen. (Vocabatur autem mater ejus Salumith, filia Dabri de tribu Dan.)
En medio del pleito, el hijo de la mujer israelita blasfemó el Nombre de Yehová y lo maldijo, por lo que lo llevaron ante Moisés. La madre de este hombre se llamaba Selomit, hija de Dibri, de la tribu de Dan.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y el hijo de la mujer Israelita pronunció el Nombre, y maldijo: entonces le llevaron á Moisés. Y su madre se llamaba Selomith, hija de Dribi, de la tribu de Dan.
The son of the Israelite woman blasphemed the Name with a curse. So they brought him to Moses. ( His mother’s name was Shelomith daughter of Dibri, of the tribe of Dan.)
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse narrates that the son of an Israelite woman spoke against or cursed "the Name" during a conflict, and was brought before Moses for judgment. It then identifies him through his mother's genealogy: Shelomith daughter of Dibri, of the tribe of Dan.
Key words
- yikko ("he pierced/pronounced," H5344A) — qal narrative verb from a root meaning "to bore, pierce, specify precisely"; here it describes an act done to ha-Shem ("the Name"), though the exact nuance (utter precisely vs. blaspheme) is not fixed by the verb itself.
- ha-Shem ("the Name," H8034) — masculine singular noun with definite article, the direct object of both yikko and yekallel.
- yekallel ("he cursed," H7043) — piel (intensive) narrative verb, a second, distinct action following yikko, giving the sentence two paired verbs describing what was done to "the Name."
- yaviu ("they brought," H0935P) — hiphil (causative) plural narrative verb; the subject is unspecified ("people brought him"), an impersonal plural construction.
- bat-Divri ("daughter of Dibri," H1323G construct) — construct chain identifying Shelomith by her father, itself embedded in the larger genealogical clause naming her tribe, Dan (H1835G).
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence opens with a double-verb construction: yikko ... ha-Shem ... yekallel — literally "he pierced/pronounced the Name, and he cursed." The two narrative verbs (vav-consecutive forms) present two sequential actions performed on the same object, "the Name," without the text itself specifying whether the first verb denotes simply uttering the Name aloud or an act of blasphemy; the second verb, in the piel stem, intensifies the action as "cursing." The subject throughout is ben-ha-ishah ha-Yisre'elit ("the son of the woman, the Israelite"), a construct phrase where both the head noun and the following noun carry the definite article, a pattern that marks apposition ("the woman, the Israelite one").
The clause "they brought him to Moses" uses an impersonal plural verb (yaviu), common in Hebrew narrative for unspecified agents ("people brought him"). The final clause shifts to background information via a nominal (non-verbal) sentence, "and the name of his mother [was] Shelomith," using construct chains (shem immo, "name of his mother"; bat-Divri, "daughter of Dibri") to anchor her identity within a three-generation genealogy ending in the tribal affiliation le-matteh Dan ("of the tribe of Dan").
Differences between versions
The LXX reads a plural object, "they brought them (αὐτοὺς) to Moses," where the Hebrew has the singular oto ("him"). The LXX also merges the two Hebrew verbs differently, rendering the action as "having named the name, he cursed," collapsing yikko and yekallel into a single sequence framed around "naming" rather than two independent narrative verbs. The Vulgate preserves two verbs ("blasphemasset... maledixisset") but casts them in a subordinate "cum" clause, altering the sentence's syntactic prominence compared to the Hebrew's paired main-clause narrative verbs.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.