Leviticus 22:21
וְאִישׁ כִּֽי־יַקְרִיב זֶֽבַח־שְׁלָמִים לַיהוָה לְפַלֵּא־נֶדֶר אוֹ לִנְדָבָה בַּבָּקָר אוֹ בַצֹּאן תָּמִים יִֽהְיֶה לְרָצוֹן כָּל־מוּם לֹא יִהְיֶה־בּֽוֹ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְאִ֗ישׁ כִּֽי־יַקְרִ֤יב זֶֽבַח־שְׁלָמִים֙ לַיהוָ֔ה לְפַלֵּא־נֶ֙דֶר֙ א֣וֹ לִנְדָבָ֔ה בַּבָּקָ֖ר א֣וֹ בַצֹּ֑אן תָּמִ֤ים יִֽהְיֶה֙ לְרָצ֔וֹן כָּל־מ֖וּם לֹ֥א יִהְיֶה־בּֽוֹ׃
καὶ ἄνθρωπος ὃς ἂν προσενέγκῃ θυσίαν σωτηρίου τῷ κυρίῳ, διαστείλας εὐχὴν κατὰ αἵρεσιν ἢ ἐν ταῖς , ἐκ τῶν βουκολίων ἢ ἐκ τῶν προβάτων, ἄμωμον ἔσται πᾶς μῶμος οὐκ ἔσται ἐν αὐτῷ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Homo qui obtulerit victimam pacificorum Domino, vel vota solvens, vel sponte offerens, tam de bobus quam de ovibus, immaculatum offeret ut acceptabile sit: omnis macula non erit in eo.
Cuando alguien le ofrezca a Yehová un sacrificio de paz, ya sea del ganado o del rebaño, para cumplir una promesa o como ofrenda voluntaria, el animal deberá estar en perfectas condiciones para ser aceptado. No debe tener ningún defecto.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Asimismo, cuando alguno ofreciere sacrificio de paces á Jehová para presentar voto, ú ofreciendo voluntariamente, sea de vacas ó de ovejas, sin tacha será acepto; no ha de haber en él falta.
When a man presents a peace offering to the LORD from the herd or flock to fulfill a vow or as a freewill offering, it must be without blemish or defect to be acceptable.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse establishes a condition for peace offerings brought to Yehovah, whether from herd or flock, whether to fulfill a vow or as a freewill offering: the animal must be tamim ("unblemished", H8549G) in order to be accepted, with no defect present in it.
Key words
- yakRiv ("he will present", H7126H) — hiphil imperfect, a causative form indicating the offerer actively brings/causes the offering to draw near; the imperfect aspect frames this as a recurring or potential future case, consistent with the conditional ki ("if", H3588A) opening the clause.
- falle' ("fulfill", H6381) — piel infinitive construct, intensive stem denoting the act of "distinguishing" or "specifying" a vow; paired with neder ("a vow", H5088), it marks one of two possible motivations for the offering.
- tamim ("unblemished", H8549G) — masculine singular adjective, functioning as the predicate describing the required state of the animal before it can attain ratzon.
- yihyeh ("it will be", H1961) — qal imperfect, appearing twice in the verse (lines 21 and 27), each time projecting a future state: first that the animal "will be" unblemished, second that "no blemish will be" in it — a doubled structure reinforcing the requirement.
- ratzon ("acceptance", H7522) — masculine singular noun, the goal-state toward which the unblemished condition leads, expressed with the preposition le ("for", H9005).
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence opens with ve'ish ki ("and anyone if", H0376I + H3588A), a casuistic construction typical of legal material in Leviticus, setting up a general case rather than addressing a specific individual. The subject is deliberately unspecified — 'ish ("anyone") — so the law applies broadly to whoever brings the offering described.
The offering itself is identified as zevach-shelamim ("a sacrifice of peace offering[s]", H2077 construct + H8002), directed la-Yehovah ("to Yehovah", H3068G). Two possible occasions for this offering are given through parallel prepositional phrases: le-falle'-neder ("to fulfill a vow") or li-ndavah ("to a freewill offering", H5071), and the source of the animal is specified as ba-baqar ("in the herd", H1241) o va-tzon ("or in the flock", H6629G).
The core requirement follows in two grammatically parallel clauses, both using yihyeh ("it will be", H1961) in the qal imperfect: first, the animal tamim yihyeh le-ratzon ("unblemished it will be, for acceptance") — the adjective tamim precedes the verb for emphasis; second, kol-mum lo' yihyeh bo ("any blemish not will be in it"), where kol-mum ("any blemish", H3605 construct + H3971B) is fronted before the negation lo' ("not", H3808), giving prominence to the absolute exclusion of defect. The repetition of yihyeh across both clauses creates a chiastic reinforcement: the positive state required, then the negative state excluded.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.