Leviticus 19:16

לֹא־תֵלֵךְ רָכִיל בְּעַמֶּיךָ לֹא תַעֲמֹד עַל־דַּם רֵעֶךָ אֲנִי יְהוָֽה׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

לֹא־תֵלֵ֤ךְ רָכִיל֙ בְּעַמֶּ֔יךָ לֹ֥א תַעֲמֹ֖ד עַל־דַּ֣ם רֵעֶ֑ךָ אֲנִ֖י יְהוָֽה׃

Greek (Septuagint)

οὐ πορεύσῃ δόλῳ ἐν τῷ ἔθνει σου· οὐκ ἐπιστήσῃ ἐφ’ αἷμα τοῦ πλησίον σου· ἐγώ εἰμι Κύριος ὁ θεὸς ὑμῶν.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Non eris criminator, nec susurro in populo. Non stabis contra sanguinem proximi tui. Ego Dominus.

Spanish

“‘No andes chismeando entre tu pueblo. “‘No pongas en peligro la vida de tu prójimo. Yo soy Yehová.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

No andarás chismeando en tus pueblos. No te pondrás contra la sangre de tu prójimo: Yo Jehová.

English

You must not go about spreading slander among your people. You must not endanger the life of your neighbor. I am the LORD.

What the text says

Summary

Leviticus 19:16 contains two prohibitions addressed to an individual within the community: not to circulate as a slanderer among one's kin, and not to "stand upon" the blood of one's neighbor. The verse closes with the formula "I am Yehovah," attaching the divine name to the command.

Key words

  • te.Lekh ("you will go about", H1980G) — qal imperfect, second person masculine singular; paired with rakhil it forms an idiomatic expression of habitual movement, "going about" as a talebearer.
  • ra.Khil ("a slanderer", H7400) — masculine singular noun functioning almost adverbially with the verb "to go," describing the manner of the forbidden walking.
  • ta.'a.Mod ("you will stand", H5975G) — qal imperfect, second masculine singular; combined with the preposition 'al ("on/against", H5921A) and dam ("blood of", H1818, construct), it forms a second idiom distinct from ordinary "standing."
  • re.'E-kha ("your neighbor", H7453 + H9021) — construct noun with second-person suffix, marking the person to whom the blood belongs; the same root appears earlier in the chapter for communal relations.
  • 'a.Ni Yehovah ("I [am] Yehovah", H0589 + H3068G) — independent pronoun plus the divine name, forming the closing self-identification typical of this chapter's legal sentences.

What the text says

The verse is built from two parallel negative clauses, each using lo' ("not", H3808) plus a qal imperfect verb, followed by the self-declaration "I am Yehovah." The first clause pairs te.Lekh ("you will go", H1980G) with the noun ra.Khil ("slanderer", H7400) rather than an adverb, producing the idiom "you will not walk [as] a slanderer among your kinspeople" — the noun functions to characterize the type of movement rather than naming a separate object. The second clause uses a different idiom: ta.'a.Mod 'al-dam ("you will stand upon/against the blood of", H5975G + H5921A + H1818), where the construct chain dam re.'E-kha ("blood of your neighbor") specifies whose blood is in view. Both idioms are compact expressions whose literal components (walking, standing, blood) carry an extended sense not fully captured by rendering them word-for-word into English. The closing formula 'ani Yehovah attaches no verb of its own; it stands as a nominal sentence, "I [am] Yehovah," sealing the two prohibitions with the divine name alone, without qualifying the pronoun or the name with any additional epithet in the Hebrew.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders rakhil ("slanderer", H7400) as δόλῳ ("with deceit"), a broader term than the Hebrew noun's specific talebearing sense. The Vulgate splits the first idiom into two nouns, criminator ("accuser") and susurro ("whisperer"), where the Hebrew has a single verb-plus-noun construction. For the second clause, the Vulgate adds contra ("against") explicitly, while the LXX uses ἐφ' ("upon"), closer to the Hebrew 'al. The closing formula in the LXX reads "ἐγώ εἰμι Κύριος ὁ θεὸς ὑμῶν" ("I am the Lord your God"), adding "your God," an element absent from the Hebrew 'ani Yehovah, which contains only the divine name.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.