Leviticus 19:14
לֹא־תְקַלֵּל חֵרֵשׁ וְלִפְנֵי עִוֵּר לֹא תִתֵּן מִכְשֹׁל וְיָרֵאתָ מֵּאֱלֹהֶיךָ אֲנִי יְהוָֽה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
לֹא־תְקַלֵּ֣ל חֵרֵ֔שׁ וְלִפְנֵ֣י עִוֵּ֔ר לֹ֥א תִתֵּ֖ן מִכְשֹׁ֑ל וְיָרֵ֥אתָ מֵּאֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ אֲנִ֥י יְהוָֽה׃
οὐ κακῶς ἐρεῖς κωφόν, καὶ ἀπέναντι τυφλοῦ οὐ προσθήσεις σκάνδαλον· καὶ φοβηθήσῃ Τύριον τὸν θεόν σου· ἐγώ εἰμι κύριος ὁ θεὸς ὑμῶν.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Non maledices surdo, nec coram cæco pones offendiculum: sed timebis Dominum Deum tuum, quia ego sum Dominus.
“‘No maldigas al sordo, ni le pongas tropiezos al ciego. Más bien, teme a tu Dios. Yo soy Yehová.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
No maldigas al sordo, y delante del ciego no pongas tropiezo, mas tendrás temor de tu Dios: Yo Jehová.
You must not curse the deaf or place a stumbling block before the blind, but you shall fear your God. I am the LORD.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse prohibits cursing a deaf person and placing an obstacle before a blind person, then commands fearing God, closing with a self-identification formula "I am Yehovah." The two prohibitions target vulnerable people who cannot detect or respond to certain harms (an insult unheard, an obstacle unseen).
Key words
techalLel ("you will curse", H7043) — piel imperfect, second person masculine singular; the piel stem gives the verb an intensive or effective sense (to curse/treat with contempt), and the imperfect marks an ongoing prohibition addressed to "you."
cheResh ("a deaf [person]", H2795) — masculine singular adjective used substantively, naming the object of the first prohibition without specifying context, making the command general.
mikhShol ("a stumbling block", H4383) — masculine singular noun, the object of titTen ("you will put", H5414), describing a physical or situational obstacle placed in someone's path.
yaReta ("you will fear", H3372) — qal sequential perfect, second person masculine singular; the vav-consecutive construction ties this clause to the preceding prohibitions, shifting from negative commands to a positive one within the same sequence.
'ani YHWH ("I [am] Yehovah", H0589 + H3068) — personal pronoun plus the divine name, forming a self-declarative formula that closes the verse without a linking verb (absent in Hebrew, supplied in translation).
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence is built from two parallel prohibitions using lo' ("not", H3808) plus an imperfect verb — first lo' techalLel ("you will not curse") aimed at the cheResh ("deaf", H2795), then lo' titTen ("you will not put") aimed at placing a mikhShol ("stumbling block", H4383) lifnei ("before", H6440) the 'iVer ("blind", H5787). Both objects — deaf and blind — are grammatically simple adjectives functioning as nouns, without further qualification (no "your neighbor" or similar), leaving the prohibition unrestricted in scope within the verse itself.
The third clause shifts construction: ve-yaReta uses a vav-consecutive with the perfect (H3372), which continues the sequence of commands but changes polarity from negative to positive — "you will fear" rather than "you will not." The object of this fear, 'eloHeicha ("your God", H0430), is a construct plural noun with pronominal suffix, syntactically parallel to how fnei 'iVer was constructed. The verse ends with 'ani YHWH, a nominal clause with no copula in the Hebrew text, functioning as a self-standing formula rather than a full sentence with "am" as translations supply.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders 'eloHeicha ("your God", H0430) as Τύριον τὸν θεόν σου — a rendering that inserts an additional descriptive term not present in the Hebrew construct phrase, then adds ὁ θεὸς ὑμῶν ("your God," plural) after κύριος, expanding the closing formula beyond the Hebrew's simple 'ani YHWH. The Vulgate similarly expands the ending with quia ego sum Dominus ("because I am the Lord"), adding the causal conjunction quia ("because") not present in the Hebrew, which juxtaposes the two clauses without a connector.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.