Leviticus 15:3

וְזֹאת תִּהְיֶה טֻמְאָתוֹ בְּזוֹבוֹ רָר בְּשָׂרוֹ אֶת־זוֹבוֹ אֽוֹ־הֶחְתִּים בְּשָׂרוֹ מִזּוֹבוֹ טֻמְאָתוֹ הִֽוא׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְזֹ֛את תִּהְיֶ֥ה טֻמְאָת֖וֹ בְּזוֹב֑וֹ רָ֣ר בְּשָׂר֞וֹ אֶת־זוֹב֗וֹ אֽוֹ־הֶחְתִּ֤ים בְּשָׂרוֹ֙ מִזּוֹב֔וֹ טֻמְאָת֖וֹ הִֽוא׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ οὗτος ὁ νόμος τῆς ἀκαθαρσίας αὐτοῦ· ῥέων γόνον ἐκ σώματος αὐτοῦ ἐκ τῆς ῥύσεως ἧς συνέστηκεν τὸ σῶμα αὐτοῦ διὰ τῆς ῥύσεως, αὕτη ἡ ἀκαθαρσία αὐτοῦ ἐν αὐτῷ· πᾶσαι αἱ ἡμέραι ῥύσεως σώματος αὐτοῦ ᾗ συνέστηκεν τὸ σῶμα αὐτοῦ διὰ τῆς ῥύσεως ἀκαθαρσία αὐτοῦ ἐστίν.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Et tunc judicabitur huic vitio subjacere, cum per singula momenta adhæserit carni ejus, atque concreverit fœdus humor.

Spanish

Su impureza consiste en lo siguiente: ya sea que el flujo le salga del cuerpo o que se le retenga, el hombre es impuro.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y esta será su inmundicia en su flujo; sea que su carne destiló por causa de su flujo, ó que su carne se obstruyó á causa de su flujo, él será inmundo.

English

This uncleanness is from his discharge, whether his body allows the discharge to flow or blocks it. So his discharge will bring about uncleanness.

What the text says

Summary

Leviticus 15:3 defines what counts as ritual uncleanness (tum'ah) connected to a man's bodily discharge (zov). The verse states that this uncleanness applies whether the discharge flows or is blocked, closing with a pronoun that reaffirms the identification of this condition as uncleanness.

Key words

  • zot ("this", H2063) — demonstrative particle opening the verse, pointing forward to the definition that follows.
  • tihyeh ("it will be", H1961) — qal imperfect, third-person feminine, indicating a rule with ongoing or generalized application rather than a single completed event.
  • rar ("it has secreted", H7325) — qal perfect, third-person masculine, describing the first scenario as a completed/realized condition: the flesh emitting discharge.
  • hechtim ("it has been obstructed", H2856) — hiphil perfect, third-person masculine; the hiphil stem marks a causative sense, so the flesh is described as having caused a blockage or stoppage of the discharge, contrasting with the free flow in rar.
  • hi' ("it", H1931) — feminine personal pronoun closing the verse, referring back to tum'ato ("his uncleanness") and syntactically confirming the equivalence between the described condition and uncleanness.

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence is built as a frame: it opens with zot tihyeh tum'ato ("this will be his uncleanness") and closes with tum'ato hi' ("it is his uncleanness"), repeating the noun tum'ato ("his uncleanness", H2932) with its third-person masculine suffix at both ends. This repetition brackets the two conditions described in between, functioning as an inclusio that marks the boundaries of the legal definition.

Between these two occurrences of tum'ato, two verbal clauses are joined by the disjunctive 'o ("or", H0176A): rar besaro et-zovo ("his flesh has secreted his discharge") and hechtim besaro mizzovo ("his flesh has been obstructed from his discharge"). Both verbs are in the perfect aspect, presenting each scenario as a realized state rather than a hypothetical. The qal form rar denotes a simple, unmarked flowing, while the hiphil form hechtim adds a causative nuance, marking the stoppage as an effected condition of the flesh rather than a mere absence of flow. The construct chains tum'ato, zovo, and besaro — each followed by the third-person masculine suffix -o ("his", H9023) — consistently tie the uncleanness, the discharge, and the flesh back to the same male subject throughout the verse.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders the opening as "this is the law (νόμος) of his uncleanness," introducing the noun "law," which has no equivalent in the Hebrew wording of zot tihyeh tum'ato ("this will be his uncleanness"). The LXX also expands the description of the discharge with phrases like "flowing seed from his body" and "the flux by which his body coheres," which elaborate beyond the more compact Hebrew construct phrases zovo and besaro. The Vulgate diverges further, speaking of judgment occurring when the discharge "adheres to his flesh at every moment" and a "foul humor coagulates," phrasing not directly mapped onto the Hebrew perfect verbs rar and hechtim.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.