Leviticus 15:26

כָּל־הַמִּשְׁכָּב אֲשֶׁר־תִּשְׁכַּב עָלָיו כָּל־יְמֵי זוֹבָהּ כְּמִשְׁכַּב נִדָּתָהּ יִֽהְיֶה־לָּהּ וְכָֽל־הַכְּלִי אֲשֶׁר תֵּשֵׁב עָלָיו טָמֵא יִהְיֶה כְּטֻמְאַת נִדָּתָֽהּ׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

כָּל־הַמִּשְׁכָּ֞ב אֲשֶׁר־תִּשְׁכַּ֤ב עָלָיו֙ כָּל־יְמֵ֣י זוֹבָ֔הּ כְּמִשְׁכַּ֥ב נִדָּתָ֖הּ יִֽהְיֶה־לָּ֑הּ וְכָֽל־הַכְּלִי֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר תֵּשֵׁ֣ב עָלָ֔יו טָמֵ֣א יִהְיֶ֔ה כְּטֻמְאַ֖ת נִדָּתָֽהּ׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ πᾶσαν κοίτην ἐφ’ ἢν ἂν κοιμηθῇ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς πάσας τὰς ἡμέρας τῆς ῥύσεως κατὰ τὴν κοίτην τῆς ἀφέδρου ἔσται αὐτῇ, καὶ πᾶν σκεῦος ἐφ’ ὃ ἐὰν καθίσῃ ἐπ’ αὐτὸ ἀκάθαρτον ἔσται κατὰ τὴν ἀκαθαρσίαν τῆς ἀφέδρου.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Omne stratum, in quo dormierit, et vas in quo sederit, pollutum erit.

Spanish

Cualquier cama donde se acueste y cualquier mueble donde se siente durante esos días serán impuros, igual que en los días de su menstruación.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Toda cama en que durmiere todo el tiempo de su flujo, le será como la cama de su costumbre; y todo mueble sobre que se sentare, será inmundo, como la inmundicia de su costumbre.

English

Any bed on which she lies or any furniture on which she sits during the days of her discharge will be unclean, like her bed during her menstrual period.

What the text says

Summary

The verse extends the impurity rules of menstrual niddah (H5079) to a woman experiencing an abnormal or prolonged discharge (zov, H2101). Any bed she lies on or object she sits on during the days of this discharge becomes impure, following the same legal pattern established for ordinary menstrual impurity.

Key words

  • zovah ("her discharge", H2101) — construct noun with pronominal suffix; refers to the abnormal or prolonged flow being regulated, distinct from ordinary menstruation.
  • niddah ("menstrual impurity", H5079) — appears twice in construct form (mishkav niddatah, tum'at niddatah), serving as the reference point to which the abnormal discharge is compared.
  • mishkav ("bed", H4904) — masculine singular construct, used three times; the repeated construct chains ("bed of her discharge," "bed of her impurity") link the two categories of impurity syntactically.
  • tish.Kav / te.Shev ("she will lie" / "she will sit", H7901G, H3427) — qal imperfect verbs denoting repeated or habitual action, not a single instance.
  • tum'ah ("uncleanness", H2932) — abstract feminine noun, paired with niddah in construct to state the legal status directly.

What the text says

The verse is built on two parallel clauses, each following the same grammatical pattern: a definite construct noun (kol-hamishkav, "every bed"; vekol-hakli, "and every article") followed by a relative clause with an imperfect verb (tishkav, teshev) describing repeated contact, and then a comparative clause introduced by the preposition ke- ("like", H9004) that equates the new situation to the established norm of niddah.

The construct chains are significant: mishkav zovah ("bed of her discharge") is explicitly likened to mishkav niddatah ("bed of her [menstrual] impurity"), and similarly tum'at niddatah ("uncleanness of her menstrual impurity") becomes the standard against which the impurity from the kli ("article", H3627) is measured. This double comparison shows that the Hebrew text treats the abnormal discharge (zov) as a distinct category from ordinary niddah, but assigns it identical legal consequences by explicit textual comparison rather than by treating the two terms as synonyms.

Differences between versions

The Septuagint renders both zov and niddah with the same Greek term, ἄφεδρος (used for tas hēmeras tēs rhyseōs and tēn koitēn tēs aphedrou), which does not preserve the Hebrew's distinct vocabulary for the two categories of discharge. The Vulgate condenses the entire verse into a single short clause ("Omne stratum, in quo dormierit, et vas in quo sederit, pollutum erit"), omitting the specification of "all the days of her discharge" and both comparative clauses to niddah found twice in the Hebrew.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.