Leviticus 14:45

וְנָתַץ אֶת־הַבַּיִת אֶת־אֲבָנָיו וְאֶת־עֵצָיו וְאֵת כָּל־עֲפַר הַבָּיִת וְהוֹצִיא אֶל־מִחוּץ לָעִיר אֶל־מָקוֹם טָמֵֽא׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְנָתַ֣ץ אֶת־הַבַּ֗יִת אֶת־אֲבָנָיו֙ וְאֶת־עֵצָ֔יו וְאֵ֖ת כָּל־עֲפַ֣ר הַבָּ֑יִת וְהוֹצִיא֙ אֶל־מִח֣וּץ לָעִ֔יר אֶל־מָק֖וֹם טָמֵֽא׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ καθελοῦσιν τὴν οἰκίαν, καὶ τὰ ξύλα αὐτῆς καὶ τοὺς λίθους αὐτῆς καὶ πάντα τὸν χοῦν ἐξοίσουσιν ἔξω τῆς πόλεως εἰς τόπον ἀκάθαρτον·

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

quam statim destruent, et lapides ejus ac ligna, atque universum pulverem projicient extra oppidum in locum immundum.

Spanish

Deberán derrumbar la casa por completo —las piedras, la madera y todo el revoco— y llevarán los escombros a un lugar impuro fuera de la ciudad.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Derribará, por tanto, la tal casa, sus piedras, y sus maderos, y toda la mezcla de la casa; y lo sacará fuera de la ciudad á lugar inmundo.

English

It must be torn down with its stones, its timbers, and all its plaster, and taken outside the city to an unclean place.

What the text says

Summary

The verse instructs that the contaminated house be physically dismantled: its stones, its wood, and all the dust/plaster of the house must be removed and taken outside the city to an unclean place. The action follows directly from the priest's declaration in the preceding verses regarding a house afflicted with a persistent plague.

Key words

  • natzatz ("he will pull down", H5422) — qal sequential perfect, third person singular, continuing the narrative chain of actions begun earlier in the chapter.
  • avanav ("its stones", H0068G) — feminine plural noun in construct form with a third-person masculine singular suffix ("its"), referring back to bayit ("house", H1004B).
  • etsav ("its wood", H6086G) — masculine plural construct noun with the same possessive suffix, paralleling avanav in structure.
  • afar ("dust of", H6083) — masculine singular construct noun, governed by kol ("all", H3605), forming the phrase "all the dust of the house."
  • hotzi ("he will take out", H3318H) — hiphil (causative) sequential perfect, third person singular, denoting the act of causing the removed materials to go outside.

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence is built entirely on a chain of sequential perfect verbs — natzatz ("he will pull down") and hotzi ("he will take out") — both third person singular, continuing a narrative sequence that assumes a single subject already established earlier in the passage (the priest). The direct objects are marked explicitly with 'et four times, listing what must be removed: "the house," "its stones," "its wood," and "all the dust of the house." The threefold repetition of 'et before each material (stones, wood, dust) gives the list a formal, itemized structure, distinguishing the components of the house rather than treating it as a single mass. The final destination is expressed through a double preposition phrase, 'el-michutz la'ir ("to outside of the city") and 'el-maqom tame' ("to an unclean place"), both introduced by 'el ("to"), marking two aspects of the same removal: spatial exclusion from the city and classification of the destination as tame' ("unclean", H2931).

Differences between versions

The Hebrew verbs are grammatically singular (natzatz, hotzi — "he will pull down," "he will take out"), implying a single actor continuing from the preceding verses. The LXX renders these as plural, καθελοῦσιν ("they will tear down") and ἐξοίσουσιν ("they will bring out"), and the Vulgate similarly uses the plural destruent ("they will destroy"). The LXX also lists the materials in a different order, wood (τὰ ξύλα) before stones (τοὺς λίθους), reversing the Hebrew sequence of stones then wood. The Hebrew afar ("dust") is rendered literally as χοῦν ("soil/dust") in the LXX and pulverem ("dust") in the Vulgate, while some modern translations render it as "plaster" or "mezcla" ("mortar/mixture"), interpreting the substance functionally rather than translating the word literally.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.