Leviticus 14:40
וְצִוָּה הַכֹּהֵן וְחִלְּצוּ אֶת־הָאֲבָנִים אֲשֶׁר בָּהֵן הַנָּגַע וְהִשְׁלִיכוּ אֶתְהֶן אֶל־מִחוּץ לָעִיר אֶל־מָקוֹם טָמֵֽא׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְצִוָּה֙ הַכֹּהֵ֔ן וְחִלְּצוּ֙ אֶת־הָ֣אֲבָנִ֔ים אֲשֶׁ֥ר בָּהֵ֖ן הַנָּ֑גַע וְהִשְׁלִ֤יכוּ אֶתְהֶן֙ אֶל־מִח֣וּץ לָעִ֔יר אֶל־מָק֖וֹם טָמֵֽא׃
καὶ προστάξει ὁ ἱερεὺς καὶ ἐξελοῦσιν τοὺς λίθους· ἔστιν ἡ ἁφή· καὶ ἐκβαλοῦσιν αὐτοὺς ἔξω τῆς πόλεως εἰς τόπον ἀκάθαρτον.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
jubebit erui lapides in quibus lepra est, et projici eos extra civitatem in locum immundum:
ordenará que quiten las piedras manchadas y las tiren en un lugar impuro fuera de la ciudad.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Entonces mandará el sacerdote, y arrancarán las piedras en que estuviere la plaga, y las echarán fuera de la ciudad, en lugar inmundo:
he must order that the contaminated stones be pulled out and thrown into an unclean place outside the city.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse describes a procedural step in the diagnosis of a house affected by nega ("plague/mark", H5061): the priest issues a command, and unspecified agents remove the affected stones and dispose of them outside the city in an unclean place. The sentence is structured as a chain of sequential actions following a prior inspection.
Key words
- tzi.Vah ("he will command", H6680) — piel sequential perfect; the intensive stem marks an authoritative, formal act of ordering, not mere suggestion.
- chi.le.Tzu ("people will tear out", H2502A) — piel sequential perfect, third person plural with unspecified subject; the intensive form conveys forceful extraction of the stones, not simple removal.
- hish.Li.khu ("they will throw", H7993) — hiphil (causative) sequential perfect; grammatically marks that the agents cause the stones to be cast out, distinct from a passive "falling away."
- Na.ga' ("plague", H5061) — masculine singular noun with definite article, referring back to the specific mark already identified in the house.
- ta.Me' ("unclean", H2931) — adjective describing the destination place, not the stones themselves grammatically, though contextually linked to their removal.
What the text says
The verse is built as three sequential clauses joined by the narrative vav (H9001), each using the piel or hiphil sequential perfect: ve-tzi.Vah ("and he will command"), ve-chi.le.Tzu ("and they will tear out"), ve-hish.Li.khu ("and they will throw"). This chain structure presents the priest's command as the initiating act, followed by two actions performed by an unnamed plural subject — likely those assisting in the process, though the Hebrew does not name them explicitly, using only the third-person plural verb form.
The object of the tearing-out action is ha-'avaNim ("the stones", H0068G), further specified by the relative clause 'aSher baHen ha-Naga' ("which in them [is] the plague") — a construction using the preposition ba ("in the", H9003) with a feminine pronominal suffix Hen ("them", H9039) referring back grammatically to the stones. The final clause locates the disposal: 'el-miChutz laIr ("to outside of the city") and 'el-maKom taMe' ("to a place unclean"), using two parallel prepositional phrases with 'el (H0413), both marking destination.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders ve-chi.le.Tzu ("they will tear out") as ἐξελοῦσιν τοὺς λίθους· ἔστιν ἡ ἁφή ("they will remove the stones; the mark is [there]"), splitting the Hebrew relative clause into a separate short statement rather than a subordinate clause. The Vulgate's erui lapides in quibus lepra est ("that the stones in which the leprosy is be plucked out") preserves the subordinate structure closer to the Hebrew relative clause with 'aSher. The BSB and SBL Spanish versions translate the sequential plural verbs as passive constructions ("be pulled out and thrown"; "quiten... y las tiren"), whereas the Hebrew verbs are active third-person plural without an expressed subject.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.